Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teaching elements of English RP connected speech and CALL: Phonemic assimilation

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phonology represents an important part of the English language; however, in the course of English language acquisition, it is rarely treated with proper attention. Connected speech is one of the aspects essential for successful communication, which comprises effective auditory perception and speech production. In this paper I explored phonemic assimilation, which results in successive sounds at word boundaries influencing each other, as an element of connected speech, and studied how teaching it can be supported with computer-assisted language learning. The research conducted revealed that elements of phonemic assimilation are found frequently in all styles of speech and thus, the knowledge of it is necessary for developing proper listening and speaking skills. I advocate the use of the Internet as one of the best possible resources of listening materials for learning phonemic variations and show how various web tools and means of technology can be used for preparing, presenting and storing educational materials. I believe this article makes a contribution to the corpus of research and instruction on connected speech as part of the standard British accent and will have an impact in raising general awareness of its significant role in the process of English language learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, W., Baker, A., Burri, M., & Teaman, B. (2013). Preliminaries to haptic-integrated pronunciation instruction. In J. Levis, K. LeVelle Ed. Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Aug. 2012. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, pp. 234–244.

  • Alipanahi, F. (2014). Technology and English language pronounciation. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(S3), 461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive white board revolution: Teaching with IWBs.

  • Blumenfeld, R. (2002). Accents: A manual for acting. New York: Limelight Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, M. C. (2010). Synchronous voice computer mediated communication: effects on pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 1–20. Retrieved from https://calico.org.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, W. (2011). Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: the students’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 393–417. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.567354.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, P. (2008). A glossary of phonology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebrian, J. (2000). Transferability and productivity of l1 rules in Catalan-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 1–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, L. K. L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73–99. doi:10.1080/09588220802613831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coryell, J. E., & Chlup, D. T. (2008). Implementing E-learning components with adult English language learners: vital factors and lessons learned. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 263–278. doi:10.1080/09588220701489333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper, G. (2003). The value of an explicit pronunciation syllabus in ESOL teaching. Prospect, 18(3), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, D. A., & Kim, J. (2011). Performance and anxiety in videoconferencing. In F. Zhang (Ed.), Computer-enhanced and mobile-assisted language learning. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden, A. (2008). Gimson’s pronunciation of English (7th ed.). London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmonte, R. (2011). Exploring speech technologies for language learning. In Prof. Ivo Ipsic Ed. Speech and Language Technologies. InTech.

  • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: a research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. doi:10.2307/3588486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, S. E. (2012). Skype for literacy and language learning: “How To” tips and best practices for teachers. Calgary: Onate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elimat, A. K., & AbuSeileek, A. F. (2014). Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation. The JALT CALL Journal, 10(1), 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, S. E. (2014). Assessing instructional effects of proficiency-level EFL pronunciation teaching under a connected speech-based approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 665–692. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.4.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Maidment, J. A. (2000). English transcription course. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golonkaa, E. M., Bowlesa, A. R., Frankab, V. M., Richardsonc, D. L., & Freynika, S. (2012). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L. (2008). Effective practice with e-Portfolios. Retrieved from www.jisc.ac.uk.

  • Halle, M., Vaux, B., & Wolfe, A. (2000). On feature spreading and the representation of place of articulation. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(3), 387–444. doi:10.1162/002438900554398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harb, J., Bakar, N. A., & Krish, P. (2014). Gender differences in attitudes towards learning oral skills using technology. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hincks, R., & Edlund, J. (2009). Promoting increased pitch variation in oral presentations with transient visual feedback. Language Learning and Technology, 13(3), 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., & Huang, S.-M. (2011). A study of a multimedia web annotation system and its effect on the EFL writing and speaking performance of junior high school students. ReCALL, 23(2), 160–180. doi:10.1017/S0958344011000061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. T. (1993). English phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (2000). How to teach pronunciation. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. doi:10.1080/09588220903467335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengeris, A. (2012). Prosody and second language teaching: Lessons from L2 speech perception and production research. In J. Romero-Trillo Ed., Pragmatics and Prosody in Second Language Teaching. 25–40.

  • Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 184–202. doi:10.1017/S0267190508070098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (4th ed.). (2003). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

  • Luo, B. (2014). Evaluating a computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) technique for efficient classroom instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.963123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchal, A. (2009). From speech physiology to linguistic phonetics. London: ISTE Ltd. Mills.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. C. (2006). Using the internet for active teaching and learning. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2003). Faculty use of Course Management Systems (Vol. 2). Retrieved from http://educause.edu.

  • Mushangwe, H. (2014). De-foreignizing a sound: computer-assisted pronunciation practice in learning a foreign language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2008a). The effectiveness of computer-based speech corrective feedback for improving segmental quality in L2 Dutch. ReCALL, 20(2), 225–243. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neri, A., Mich, A., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008b). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393–408. doi:10.1080/09588220802447651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nix, J. M. L. (2014). Cluster and time-series analyses of computer-assisted pronunciation training users: looking beyond scoring systems to measure learning and engagement. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouni, S. (2013). Tongue control and its implication in pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 439–453. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.761637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (2005). Facilitating reflective learning: An example of practice in TESOL teacher education. Retrieved from https://www.llas.ac.uk.

  • Posner, G. J. (1996). Field experience: A guide to reflective teaching. White Plains: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M., & Michaud, C. (2011). An integrated approach to pronunciation: Listening comprehension and intelligibility in theory and practice. In. J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Ames, IA: Iowa State University

  • Roach, P. J. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, A. (2011). Acquisition of L2 phonology in advanced learners: Does instruction make a difference? In. Levis, J., & LeVelle, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

  • Saito, K. (2011). Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in native-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: an instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20(1), 45–59. doi:10.1080/09658416.2010.540326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, E. (2008). Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules: evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech. Language Sciences, 32(2), 63–86. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2008.10.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. A. (1987). Acting with an accent: Standard British. Lyndonville: Dialect Accents Specialists, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 744–765.

  • Tiernan, P. (2015). An inquiry into the current and future uses of digital video in University teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 20(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, A. (2005). What not to teach when teaching pronunciation. The CATESOL Journal, 17(1), 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofimovich, P., & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in L2 Spanish word processing: implications for pronunciation instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 141–159. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi, H., Sahragard, R., & Nasirizadeh, Z. (2007). The effects of phonological features on Iranian EFL learners listening comprehension. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 11(2).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 50 Komandarma Korka Street, apt. 87, 61195, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Ganna Veselovska

Authors
  1. Ganna Veselovska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganna Veselovska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veselovska, G. Teaching elements of English RP connected speech and CALL: Phonemic assimilation. Educ Inf Technol 21, 1387–1400 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9389-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9389-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation