An approach to designing and evaluating blended courses
Recently, there has been an increased interest in producing electronic courses. However, literature shows that adopting e-learning does not guarantee improved learning. This is because mixing technology and content does not necessarily yield effective learning. This paper presents a systematic design process for developing blended courses for undergraduate higher education. The instructional design process is based on instructional design theories and utilized three taxonomies: Bloom Taxonomy, Redeker Taxonomy and Guerra scale. A mapping model is proposed and embedded in the design process to develop a blended course starting from the objectives and content of a traditional course. This paper also presents a evaluation process that estimates the effectiveness of the selected technologies in the design of the blended course. This effectiveness is evaluated in terms of three dimensions: course content formats, interaction and collaboration. A case study is presented to demonstrate the proposed design approach on a System Analysis and Design blended course under development.
KeywordsInstructional blended course design Design evaluation
- Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
- Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison, Wesley Longman. http://www.techlearning.com/techlearning/archives/2008/04/AndrewChurches.pdf Accessed 25,June, 2010.
- Blezu, C., & Popa, E. (2008). E-learning and its Prospects in Education, Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on Computers, July 23–25 (pp. 297–302). Greecez: Heraklion.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational goals by a Committee of College and University Examiners.” Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, Longmans.Google Scholar
- Bower, M. (2008). Designing for Interactive and Collaborative Learning in a Web-Conferencing Environment, PhD thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
- Bower, M. (2006). A Learning System Engineering Approach to Developing Online Courses, In Proceedings of Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Branon, R., & Beatty, B., & Wilson, J. (2001). Developing Online Courses: a Human-Centered Approach, Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development [and] Practice Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Atlanta, GA, November 8–12.Google Scholar
- Chiang, G. (2002). What Kind of Support Do They Need? An Instructional Designer’s Experience in Faculty and Student Support for Online Courses. SIGUCCS’02, November 20–23, Providence, USA.Google Scholar
- Churches, A. (2008).Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom%27s+Digital+Taxonomy. Accessed 20 June, 2010.
- Graham, C. (2006). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.Google Scholar
- Guerra, T. & Heffernan, D. (2004). The Guerra Scale”. http://www.learningcircuits.org/2004/mar2004/guerra.htm. Accessed 15 March 2010.
- Gruenbaum, E. (2010). Predictors of Success for Adult Online Learners: a Review of the Literature. Magazine eLearn, 2010(2).Google Scholar
- Hodhod, R., Ibrahim, M., Khafagy, M., et al. (2010). Issues of Choosing the Suitable Virtual Learning Environment. Research Journal of Information Technology, 2(1), 24–29.Google Scholar
- Kulvietiene, R. & Sileikiene I. (2006). The Blended Learning Delivery Design Model, Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Distance Learning and Web Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September 22–24.Google Scholar
- Molenda, M. (2003). In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance improvement, 42(5), 34. http://www.indiana.edu/~molpage/ Accessed 10 March 2010.
- Neale, D., Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. (2004). Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: models and frameworks. Proceedings of the. (2004). ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 112–121). Illinois, USA: Chicago.Google Scholar
- Paragina, F., Paragina, S., & Jipa, A. (2010). E–learning A New Trend in Teachers Training Activities. Conference proceedings of E-Learning and Software for Education, 1, 115–118.Google Scholar
- Piskurich, G. (2003). The AMA Handbook of E-Learning—Effective Design, Implementation, and Technology Solutions. New York: AMACOM AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION.Google Scholar
- Redeker, G. (2003). An Educational Taxonomy for Learning Objects, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’03), July 9–11. Greece: Athens.Google Scholar
- Ssemugabi, S., & Villiers R. (2007). A Comparative Study of Two Usability Evaluation Methods Using a Web-Based E-Learning Application, Proceedings of SAICSIT, Fish River Sun, South Africa, October 2–3.Google Scholar