Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 71–88 | Cite as

E-learning in life long education: A computational approach to determining listening comprehension ability

  • Cem Işık
  • Sümeyra Yılmaz


E-Learning is the use of telecommunication technology to deliver information for education and training and it is emerging as the new paradigm of modern education. Because of the increasing amount of technology integration in the learning environment, more and more studies focus on examining “how people learn with technology” This study was conducted to find out how computer assisted language learning contributes to learners’ ability to develop listening comprehension. The results revealed that learner computer anxiety, instructor attitude toward e-Learning, e-Learning course flexibility, e-Learning course quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and diversity in assessments are the critical factors affecting learners’ perceived satisfaction.


E-learning Lifelong learning Learning environments Technology Design Listening comprehension 


  1. Abouserie, R., Moss, D., & Barasi, S. (1992). Cognitive style, gender, attitude toward computer-assisted learning and academic achievement. Education Studies, 18(2), 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses an exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aşkar, P., Yavuz, H., & Köksal, M. (1992). Students’ perceptions of computer assisted instruction environment and their attitudes towards computer assisted learning. Educational Research, 34(2), 11–39.Google Scholar
  4. Bacig, T. D., Evans, R. A., & Larmouth, D. W. (1991). Computer-assisted instruction in critical thinking and writing: a process/model approach. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 43–51.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, L. L. (1971). Listening behavior (p. 3). USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bayır, G. O. (1995). Hizmet İçi Eğitimde Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretimin Etkililiği [Efficiency of computer-assisted instruction in in-service training]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, p. 78.Google Scholar
  7. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, T. (2005). Towards a model for m-learning in Africa. International Journal on E-Learning, 4(3), 299–315.Google Scholar
  10. Buran, S. (2008). The effects of computer assisted language learning on listening comprehension ability. Unpublished Master Thesis, Atatürk University, The Institute of Social Sciences Department of English Language and Literature.Google Scholar
  11. Curtin, C., Dawson, C. L., Provenzano, N., & Cooper, P. (1976). The PLATO system: using the computer to teach Russian. Slavic and East European Journal, 20(3), 92–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewhurst, D. G., Macleod, H. A., & Norris, T. A. M. (2000). Independent student learning aided by computers: an acceptable alternative to lectures? Computers & Education, 35, 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dursun, F. (1998). Öğretmenlerin Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretime İlişkin Yeterlilikleri ve Eğitim İhtiyaçlarının Saptanması, [Teachers’ qualifiedness in regard to computer assisted instruction and determining the needs of education]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, pp. 32–45.Google Scholar
  14. Garcia, M. R., & Arias, F. V. (2000). A comparative study in motivation and learning through print-oriented and computer-oriented tests. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4–5), 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glasser, W. (2001). Choice theory in the classroom. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  16. Göktaş, İ. (1996). Bilgisayar Eğitimi Öğretim Teknolojisi, [Computer education teaching technology]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, pp. 42–56.Google Scholar
  17. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardisty, D., & Windeatt, S. (1989). CALL. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hauck, B. A., Mclain, L. W., & Youngs, B. E. (1999). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 269–306.Google Scholar
  20. Kılıçkaya, F. (2007). The Effect of Computer-Assisted Language Learning on Turkish Learners’ Achievement on the TOEFL Exam, Teaching English with Technology A Journal for Teachers of English, Vol. 7, Issue 1 (February), ISSN 1642–1027.Google Scholar
  21. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: a meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 525–544.Google Scholar
  22. Lowe, N., & Bickel, R. (1993). Computer-assisted instruction in Appalachia’s postsecondary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 87(1), 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative elearning. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1339–1353.Google Scholar
  24. Muir-Herzig, R. G. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers & Education, 42, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murcia-Celce, M. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed., p. 82). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
  26. Murray, G. L. (1999). Exploring learners’ CALL experiences: a reflection on method. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(3), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nadzrah, A. B. (2007). Using blog to develop interests among ESL students: A bew paradigm in language education. Paper presented at AsiaTEFL 2007.Google Scholar
  28. Nagata, N. (1996). Computers vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal, 14(1), 53–57.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
  30. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic it skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rivers, W. M., & Temperly, M. S. (1978). A practical guide to the teaching of English as a second or foreign language (p. 62). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenbaum, P. S. (1968). The computer as a learning environment for foreign language instruction, IBM Research Report RC-2352. (Reprinted in Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 2, 1969), Vol. 4, pp. 65–457.Google Scholar
  33. Russell, M. (1999). Testing on computers: a follow-up study comparing performance on computer and on paper. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(20), 54–63.Google Scholar
  34. Şenocak, M. (1990). Temel Biyoistatistik (pp. 106–115). Beyoğlu-İstanbul: Çağlayan Kitapevi.Google Scholar
  35. Şentürk, H. (1997). The effects of supplementary computer assisted listening instruction on listening comprehension ability. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Anadolu University Social Sciences Institute, Eskişehir, pp. 15–23.Google Scholar
  36. Stonebraker, P. W., & Hazeltine, J. E. (2004). Virtual learning effectiveness. The Learning Organization, 11(2/3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suppes, P., & Mornignstar, M. (1969). Computer-assisted instruction. Science, 166, 50–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weinstein, C. E., & Meyer, D. K. (1994). Learning strategies, teaching and testing. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist learning environments: case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  40. Yang, S. C. (2001). Integrating computer-mediated tools into the language curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yaşar, S. (1997). Expending the effective use of computers in middle and high schools in Turkey (pp. 24–32). Eskişehir: Anadolu University.Google Scholar
  42. Ying, F. (2002). Promoting learner autonomy through CALL projects in China’s EFL context. Teaching English with Technology: A Journal for Teachers of English, 2(5), 41–57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Atatürk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Kara Elmas UniversityZonguldakTurkey

Personalised recommendations