Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 59–70 | Cite as

Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know?

  • Margaret J. Cox
  • Gail Marshall
Article

Abstract

Many decades after the introduction of ICT into classrooms there are still unanswered questions about the impact of technology in the long and short term on students’ learning, and how it has affected simple and complex learning tasks. These are important for (a) forming government policies; (b) directing teacher education programmes: (c) advancing national curricula; (d); designing or reforming classroom implementation and (e) analysing costs and benefits. While a plethora of studies has been conducted on the effects of ICT in education, major policy and methodological problems have precluded an unambiguous answer to such questions as:—“Does the way in which ICT is implemented have a major/minor impact on students’ knowledge and understanding?” and “Does the impact affect the surface or deep structure of students’ thinking and acting?” To date we have had no large-scale longitudinal studies of ICT’s impact in education such as we have in the form of studies of earlier major curriculum development projects. Nor have we had many comprehensive studies of the complex interactions between various types of ICT implementation and the effects of other factors such as school-based interventions, socio-economic status and school expenditures which have been shown to have a greater impact on education compared with other previous innovations in education. Furthermore we do not know if previous research studies have used research methods that matched learning objectives to instruments/procedures. Many previous studies are vague as to the actual measures used but we can infer that standardized tests were a frequent measure. In other instances, ad hoc analyses, with criteria that may have varied from analyst to analyst and were not “blind” analyses were certainly used to measure “success.” All of these limitations and uncertainties and many more point to the need for a thorough, rigorous, and multifaceted approach to analysing the impact of ICT on students’ learning. This paper draws on previous research evidence to identify relevant research strategies to address the gaps in our knowledge about ICT and students’ learning explained above.

Keywords

Research methods Government policy Assessment Evaluation and accreditation Integration of ICT into education Impact of ICT on students’ learning 

References

  1. Barker, R. T., & Pearce, C. G. (1995). Personnal attributes and computer writing quality. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, J. (1994). Causality and common sense reasoning. In H. Mellar, J. Bliss, R. Boohan, J. Ogborn, & Tompsett (Eds.), Learning with artificial worlds: Computer based modelling in the curriculum. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  4. Callahan, R. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Castillo, N. (2006). The Implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): An investigation into the level of use and integration of ICT by secondary school teachers in Chile. PhD thesis. King’s College London, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, P. C.-H., Lowe, R. K., & Scaife, M. (2001). Cognitive science approaches to diagrammatic representations. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1/2), 79–94.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clements, D. H. (2000). From exercises and tasks to problems and projects—Unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(1), 9–47.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Clements, D. H., & Meredith, J. (1992). Research on Logo: Effects and efficacy. New York: Logo Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, F. (1997) Social reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cox, M. J. (1993). Information technology resourcing and use. In D. M. Watson (Ed.), Impact–an evaluation of the impact of the information technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools. King’s College London.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, M. J. (1997a). The effects of information technology on students’ motivation. Final report. National Council for Educational Technology, Coventry.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, M. J. (1997b). Identification of the changes in attitude and pedagogical practices needed to enable teachers to use information technology in the school curriculum. In D. Passey & B. Samways (Eds.), IFIP: Information technology: Supporting change through teacher education (pp. 87–94). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, M. J. (2000). Information and communication technologies: Their role and value for science education. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching—What research has to say (pp. 142–158). UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, M. J. (2003). How do we know that ICT has an impact on children’s learning? A review of techniques and methods to measure changes in pupils’ learning promoted by the use of ICT. In G. Marshall & Y. Katz (Eds.), Learning in school, home and community. ICT for early and elementary education. Massachusetts, USA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Cox, M. J. (2005). Educational conflict: The problems in institutionalizing new technologies in education. In G. Kouzelis, M. Pournari, M. Stoeppler & V. Tselfes (Eds.), Knowledge in the new technologies. Frankfurt, Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Cox, M. J., & Abbott, C. (2004). ICT and attainment: A review of the research literature, Coventry and London, British Educational Communications and Technology Agency/Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  17. Cox, M. J., & Nikolopoulou, K. (1997). What information handling skills are promoted by the use of data analysis software? Education and Information Technologies Journal, 2(2), 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cox M. J., & Webb, M. E. (1994). Developing software and curriculum materials: The Modus Project. In H. Mellar, J. Bliss, J. Ogborn & C. Tompsett (Eds.), Learning with artificial worlds: Computer based modelling in the curriculum 188–198. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Cox, M. J., & Webb, M. E. (2004). ICT and pedagogy: A review of the research literature, Coventry and London, British Educational Communications and Technology Agency/Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  20. DfES (2003). Department for education and skills. Fulfilling the potential. Transforming teaching and learning through ICT in schools. DfES. London.Google Scholar
  21. Gardner, D. G., Dukes, R. L., & Discenza, R. (1993). Computer use, self-confidence, and attitudes: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner, J., Morrison, H., Jarman, R., Reilly, C., & McNally, H. (1994). Learning with portable computers. Computers and Education, 22(1/2), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillespie, C. W. (2004). Seymour Papert’s vision for early childhood education? A descriptive study of the Head Start and kindergarten students in discovery-based Logo-rich classrooms. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 6(11) http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v6n1/Gillespie.html
  24. Ginsburg, H., & Opper, S. (1979). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Linzer, E., et al. (2002). ImpaCT2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.Google Scholar
  26. Hennessy, S. (2000). Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 155–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, D. C. (2000). Algorithmics and programming in the school mathematics curriculum: Support is waning—Is there still a case to be made? Education and Information Technologies, 5(3), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, A. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Coventry: BectaGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalas, I., & Blaho, A. (2003). Exploring visible mathematics with IMAGINE. In G. Marshall & Y. Katz (Eds.), Learning in school, home and community: ICT for early and elementary education (pp. 54–64). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  31. Koutromanos, G. (2004). The effects of head teachers, head officers and school counsellors on the uptake of Information technology in Greek schools, Department of Education and Professional Studies. PhD thesis,. University of London.Google Scholar
  32. Liao, Y. K. C. (1999). Effects of hypermedia on students’ achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(3), 255–277.Google Scholar
  33. Loveless, A., & Ellis, V. (Eds.) (2001). ICT, pedagogy and the curriculum: subject to change. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  34. Marshall, G., & Herbert, M. (1983). Comprehensive school mathematics project. Denver, CO: McRel.Google Scholar
  35. Marshall, G., & Katz, Y. (2003). Learning in school, home and community. ICT for early and elementary education. Massachusetts, USA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  36. Mellar, H., Bliss, J., Boohan, R., Ogborn, J., & Tompsett, C. (Eds.) (1994). Learning with artificial worlds: computer based modelling in the curriculum. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  37. Mumtaz, S., & Hammond, M. (2002). The word processor re-visited: Observations on the use of the word processor to develop literacy at key stage 2. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 345–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Munro, R. (2002). Curriculum focused ICT—the critical resource. In D. M. Watson & J. Andersen (Eds.), Networking the learner. Computers in education (pp. 179–188). Massachusetts, USA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  39. Niemiec, R. P., & Walburg, H. J. (1992). The effects of computers on learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1992). Looking back and looking forward. In C. Hoyles & R. Noss (Eds.), Learning logo and mathematics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  41. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Pea, R. D., & Kurland, D. M. (1994). Logo programming and the development of planning skills. Technical report no. 11. New York: Bank Street College of Education.Google Scholar
  43. Pearson, M., & Naylor, S. (2006). Changing contexts: Teacher professional development and ICT pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 11, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Preston, C., Cox, M. J., & Cox, K. M. J. (2000). Teachers as Innovators: An evaluation of the motivation of teachers to use information and communications technologies. Croydon: King’s College London and Mirandanet.Google Scholar
  45. Scrimshaw, P. (2004). Enabling teachers to make successful use of ICT. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta).Google Scholar
  46. Stallings, J. (1975). Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in follow through classroom. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40/78, Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. Sutherland, R., Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Brawn, R., Breeze, N., Gall, M., et al. (2004). Transforming teaching and learning: Embedding ICT into everyday classroom practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Underwood, J. (1988). An Investigation of teacher intents and classroom outcomes in the use of information-handling packages. Computers and Education, 12(1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson, D. M. (Ed.) (1993). Impact—An evaluation of the impact of the information technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools. King’s College London.Google Scholar
  50. Watson, D. M., & Andersen, J. (Eds.) (2002). Networking the learner. Computers in education. Massachusetts, USA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  51. Webb, M. E. (2002). Pedagogical reasoning: Issues and solutions for the teaching and learning of ICT in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 7(3), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webb, M. E., & Cox, M. J. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(4).Google Scholar
  53. Wentling, T. L., Park, J., & Peiper, C. (2006). Learning gains associated with annotation and communication software designed for large undergraduate classes. JCAL, 23(1), 36–46.Google Scholar
  54. Wubbles, T. (1995). An interpersonal perspective on teacher behaviour in the classroom. European Conference on Educational Research, Bath, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education and Professional Studies and The Dental Institute, King’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and ComputingUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Gail Marshall & AssociatesChesterfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations