Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 11, Issue 3–4, pp 283–291 | Cite as

Changing contexts: Teacher professional development and ICT pedagogy

  • Matthew Pearson
  • Steven Naylor
Article

Abstract

This paper examines data from a series of visits to secondary schools in England which have been identified as doing innovative work with ICT. The paper argues that stable definitions of innovation are difficult in this context and require an understanding of both the technological contexts of innovation and the concept of a school as a dynamic learning community. Data is presented in the form of vignettes to demonstrate how the school visits formed a kind of “performance” in relation to the schools’ own claims about innovations and the enquiries of the research team. Discussion of the data focuses on three key themes which emerge: the changing roles of teachers; new technologies/new pedagogies and the public face of the school. The paper concludes with the observation that innovation is necessarily complex but pupil agency and creativity should always play a vital part.

Keywords

Secondary education Innovation Teacher identity Networks Digital technology 

References

  1. Claxton, G. (2005). Learning to Learn (QCA publication) [online]. Retrieved October 6, 2006 from http://www.qca.org.uk/downloads/11469_claxton_learning_to_learn.pdf.
  2. Coppieters, P. (2005). Turning schools into learning organisations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ehren, M. C. M., & Visscher, A. J. (2006). Towards a theory on the impact of school inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organisations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  8. Hope, A. (2005). Panopticism, play and the resistance of surveillance: Case studies of the observation of student Internet use in UK schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(3), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. John, P. (2004). Teaching and learning with ICT: New technology, new pedagogy? Education, Communication & Information, 4(1), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lankshear, C. (2003). The challenge of digital epistemologies. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pearson, M. & Somekh, B. (2006) Learning transformation with technology: A question of sociocultural contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(4), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shields, C. M. (2000). Learning from difference: Considerations for schools as communities. Curriculum Inquiry, 30(3), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Taylor Webb, P. (2006). The choreography of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watson, G. (2002). Models of information technology teacher professional development that engage with teachers’ hearts and minds. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1).Google Scholar
  15. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations