Skip to main content
Log in

The metronomic all-oral DEVEC is an effective schedule in elderly patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Metronomic-chemotherapy (M-CHT) has been rarely assessed in non-Hodgkin-lymphoma (NHL). Therefore, in 2011 we started experimenting a new all-oral M-CHT schedule termed DEVEC (Deltacortene®, etoposide, vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide, +/-Rituximab) in diffuse-large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods Patients with stage Ib-IV were enrolled as follows: 1) treatment-naïve, frail ≥65y, or unfit ≥85y; and 2) relapsed/refractory (R/R) ≥55y. Data were prospectively collected from six Italian centres and compared for efficacy to two reference groups, treated with established iv Rituximab-CHT in 1st and 2nd line respectively. Results from April-2011 to March-2018, 17/51(33%) naïve, 21/51(41%) refractory and 13/51(25.5%) relapsed patients started DEVEC; 39/51(76.5%) were de-novo DLBCL; 10/51(19.6%) transformed-DLBCL and 2/51(3.9%) unclassifiable-DLBCL/classical-Hodgkin-lymphoma. The median age was 85y (range=77-93) and 78y (range=57-91) in naïve and R/R respectively and overall the DEVEC patients had very poor features compared to the reference. The rate of grade≥3 haematological-AEs was 43%(95CI=29-58%): G3-neutropenia was the most frequent; grade≥3 extra-haematological-AEs was 13.7% (95%CI=5.4-25.9%), the most frequent was infection. One-year OS and PFS were 67% and 61% for naive, 60% and 50% for reference-naïve respectively; Cox proportional hazard ratio (Cox-PH-ratio) for OS and PFS were 0.69 (95%CI=0.27-1.76;p=.441) and 0.68 (95%CI=0.28-1.62;p=.381) respectively. One-year OS and PFS were 48% and 39% in the R/R, 36% and 17% in the reference-R/R respectively; Cox-PH-ratio for OS and PFS, were 0.76 (95%CI=0.42-1.40; p=.386) and 0.48 (95%CI=0.28-0.82; p=.007) respectively. Conclusion The favourable activity of DEVEC compared to a real-life series and the convenience of an oral administration, may possibly lay the groundwork for a paradigm-shift in the treatment of elderly DLBCL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tucci A, Martelli M, Rigacci L, Riccomagno P, Cabras MG, Salvi F et al (2015) Comprehensive geriatric assessment is an essential tool to support treatment decisions in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a prospective multicenter evaluation in 173 patients by the Lymphoma Italian Foundation (FIL). Leuk Lymphoma 56(4):921–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dinmohamed AG, Issa DE, Van der Poel MWM, Schouten HC, Lugtenburg PJ, Chamuleau MED et al (2017) Treatment and relative survival in very elderly patients with DLBCL in The Netherlands: a population-based study, 1989 to 2015. Blood Advances 1(21):1839–1841

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Buske C, Hutchings M, Ladetto M, Goede V, Mey U, Soubeyran P (2018) ESMO Lymphoma Consensus Conference Panel Members. ESMO Consensus Conference on malignant lymphoma: general perspectives and recommendations for the clinical management of the elderly patient with malignant lymphoma. Ann Oncol 29(3):544–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peyrade F, Jardin F, Thieblemont C, Thyss A, Emile JF, Castaigne S et al (2011) Attenuated immunochemotherapy regimen (R-miniCHOP) in elderly patients older than 80 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 12(5):460–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peyrade F, Bologna S, Delwail V, Emile JF, Pascal L, Fermé C et al (2017) Combination of ofatumumab and reduced-dose CHOP for diffuse large B-cell lymphomas in patients aged 80 years or older: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial from the LYSA group. Lancet Haematology 4:e46–e55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Merli F, Luminari S, Rossi G, Mammi C, Marcheselli L, Ferrari A et al (2014) Outcome of frail elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma prospectively identified by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: results from a study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Leuk Lymphoma 55(1):38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin RJ, Behera M, Diefenbach CS (2017) Flowers CR Role of anthracycline and comprehensive geriatric assessment for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 130(20):2180–2185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Storti S, Spina M, Pesce EA, Salvi F, Merli M, Ruffini A et al (2018) Rituximab plus bendamustine as front-line treatment in frail elderly (>70 years) patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II multicenter study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Haematologica. 103(8):1345–1350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fields PA, Townsend W, Webb A, Counsell N, Pocock C, Smith P et al (2014) De novo treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, gemcitabine, and prednisolone in patients with cardiac comorbidity: a United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial. J Clin Oncol 32(4):282–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luminari S, Viel E, Ferreri AJM, Zaja F, Chimienti E, Musuraca G et al (2018) Non pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination regimen in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and cardiac comorbidity. Results of the HEART01 phase II trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Hematol Oncol 36(1):68–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maybury B, Kimpton G, Otton S (2018) A retrospective multicentre study of COCKLE, an oral chemotherapy regimen, as palliative treatment for high grade lymphoma. British J Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15637

  12. Rashidi A, Oak E, Carson KR, Wagner-Johnston ND, Kreisel F, Bartlett NL (2016) Outcomes with R-CEOP for R-CHOP-ineligible patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma are highly dependent on cell of origin defined by Hans criteria. Leuk Lymphoma 57(5):1191–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spina M, Balzarotti M, Uziel L, Ferreri AJ, Fratino L, Magagnoli M et al (2012) Modulated chemotherapy according to modified comprehensive geriatric assessment in 100 consecutive elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncologist 17(6):838–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen QD, Zhu HY, Wang L, Fan L, Liang JH, Cao L et al (2018) Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin plus rituximab (R-GemOx) as first-line treatment in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematology 5:e261–e269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eyre TA, Salisbury R, Eyre DW, Watson C, Collins GP, Hatton CS et al (2016) Results of a large retrospective analysis of the effect of intended dose intensity of R-CHOP on outcome in a cohort of consecutive, unselected elderly patients with de novo diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 173(3):487–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar A, Fraz MA, Usman M, Malik SU, Ijaz A, Durer C, Durer S, Tariq MJ, Khan AY, Qureshi A, Faridi W, Nasar A, Anwer F (2018 Sep 1) Treating Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphomain the Very Old or Frail Patients. Curr Treat Options in Oncol 19(10):50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohmachi K, Niitsu N, Uchida T, Kim SJ, Ando K, Takahashi N et al (2013) Multicenter phase II study of bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 31(17):2103–2109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Arcari A, Chiappella A, Spina M, Zanlari L, Bernuzzi P, Valenti V et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of rituximab plus bendamustine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: an Italian retrospective multicenter study. Leuk Lymphoma 57(8):1823–1830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corazzelli G, Capobianco G, Arcamone M, Ballerini PF, Iannitto E, Russo F et al (2009) Long-term results of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin with and without rituximab as salvage treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with refractory/relapsing B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64(5):907–916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Machover D, Delmas-Marsalet B, Misra SC, Gumus Y, Goldschmidt E (2001 Oct) Schilf A, et al Dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (DHAOx) as salvage treatment for patients with initially refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol 12(10):1439–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bocci G, Kerbel R (2016) Pharmacokinetics of metronomic chemotherapy: a neglected but crucial aspect. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13(11):659–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Natale G, Bocci G (2018) Does metronomic chemotherapy induce tumor angiogenic dormancy? A review of available preclinical and clinical data. Cancer Lett 432:28–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman M, Martin P, Ruan J, Furman R, Niesvizky R, Elstrom R et al (2008) Prednisone, etoposide, procarbazine, and cyclophosphamide (PEP-C) oral combination chemotherapy regimen for recurring/refractory lymphoma: low-dose metronomic, multidrug therapy. Cancer. 112(12):2228–2232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng J, Yang L, Huang F, Hong T, He Z, Lei J et al (2016) The metronomic therapy with prednisone, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide reduces the serum levels of VEGF and circulating endothelial cells and improves response rates and progression-free survival in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78(4):01–08

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schelker RC, Herr W, Reichle A, Vogelhuber M (2018) Low-dose trofosfamide plus rituximab is an effective and safe treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: a single center experience. BMC Cancer 18(1):1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Witte HM, Riecke A, Mayer T, Bartscht T, Rades D (2019 Jan) Lehnert H et alTrofosfamide in the treatment of elderly or frailpatients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 145(1):129–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson DS, Hainsworth JD, Hande KR, Holzmer MC, Greco FA (1993) Prolonged administration of low-dose, infusional etoposide in patients with etoposide-sensitive neoplasms: a phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol

  28. Balzarotti M, Santoro A, Tondini C, Fornier M, Bonadonna G (1996 Nov) Activity of singleagent vinorelbine in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol 7(9):970–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rule S, Tighe M, Davies S, Johnson S (1998 Sep) Vinorelbine in the treatment of lymphoma. Hematol Oncol 16(3):101–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Man S, Bocci G, Francia G, Green SK, Jothy S (2002 May 15) Hanahan D et al Antitumor effects in mice of low-dose (metronomic) cyclophosphamide administered continuously through the drinking water. Cancer Res 62(10):2731–2735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bertolini F, Paul S, Mancuso P, Monestiroli S, Gobbi A, Shaked Y, Kerbel RS (2003 Aug 1) Maximum tolerable dose and low-dose metronomic chemotherapy have opposite effectson the mobilization and viability of circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Cancer Res 63(15):4342–4346

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rozados VR, Sánchez AM, Gervasoni SI, Berra HH, Matar P, Graciela SO (2004 Oct) Metronomic therapy with cyclophosphamide induces rat lymphoma and sarcomaregression, and is devoid of toxicity. Ann Oncol 15(10):1543–1550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Briasoulis E, Aravantinos G, Kouvatseas G, Pappas P, Biziota E, Sainis, I, et al. Dose selection trial of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer: a hellenic cooperative oncology group clinical translational study BMC Cancer 2013;13:263.

  34. Minard-Colin V, Ichante JL, Nguyen L, Paci A, Orbach D, Bergeron C et al (2012 Oct) Phase II study of vinorelbine and continuous low doses cyclophosphamide in children and young adults with a relapsed or refractory malignant solid tumour: good tolerance profile and efficacy in rhabdomyosarcoma--a report from the Société Française des Cancers et leucémies del'Enfant et de l'adolescent (SFCE). Eur J Cancer 48(15):2409–2416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mavroeidis L, Sheldon H, Briasoulis E, Marselos M, Pappas P, Harris AL (2015) Metronomic vinorelbine: Anti-angiogenic activity in vitro in normoxic and severe hypoxic conditions, and severe hypoxia-induced resistance to its anti-proliferative effect with reversal by Akt inhibition. Int J Oncol

  36. Launay S, Sabatier R, Brunelle S, Esterni B, Tarpin C, Viret Fet al . METRO1: A Phase I Study of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Adults with Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors. Anticancer Res 2016 Jan;36(1):293-299.

  37. Orecchioni S, Talarico G, Labanca V, Calleri A, Mancuso P, Bertolini F (2018 May) Vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide and 5-FU effects on the circulating andi ntratumoural landscape of immune cells improve anti-PD-L1 efficacy in preclinical models of breast cancer and lymphoma. Br J Cancer 118(10):1329–1336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0076-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Orlandi P, Di Desidero T, Salvia G, Muscatello B, Francia G, Bocci G (2018) Metronomic vinorelbine is directly active on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer cells and sensitizes the EGFRL858R/T790M cells to reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol 152:327–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cox MC, Musuraca G, Battistini R, Casaroli I, Zoli V, Anticoli-Borza P et al (2018) Aggressive lymphomas of the elderly: the DEVEC metronomic chemotherapy schedule fits the unfit. Br J Haematol 183(5):819–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, Harris NL, Stein H, Siebert R et al (2016) The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 127(20):2375–2390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Crump M, Neelapu SS, Farooq U, et al. Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study. Blood. 2017;130(16):1800-1808. Blood. 2018 Feb 1;131(5):587-588

  42. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ et al (2007) Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25(5):579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cox MC, Di Napoli A, Scarpino S, Salerno G, Tatarelli C, Talerico C et al (2014) Clinicopathologic characterization of diffuse-large-B-cell lymphoma with an associated serum monoclonal IgM component. PLoS One 9:e93903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zinzani PL, Pellegrini C, Argnani L, Broccoli A (2016) Prolonged disease-free survival in elderly relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with lenalidomide plus rituximab. Haematologica. 101:e385–e386. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.147256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Houot R, Cartron G, Bijou F, de Guibert S, Salles GA., Fruchart C, et al. Obinutuzumab plus Lenalidomide (GALEN) for the treatment of relapse/refractory aggressive lymphoma: a phase II LYSA study. Leukemia. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0282-y.

  46. Di Desidero T, Derosa L, Galli L, Orlandi P, Fontana A, Fioravanti A et al (2016) Clinical, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic results of a prospective phase II study on oral metronomic vinorelbine and dexamethasone in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Investig New Drugs 34(6):760–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. NL Berinstein, AJ Grillo-López, CA White, et al: Association of serum rituximab (IDEC-C2B8) concentration and anti-tumor response in the treatment of recurrent low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Ann Oncol 9: 995– 1001,1998

  48. Rossi D, Diop F, Spaccarotella E, Monti S, Zanni M, Rasi S et al (2017) Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma genotyping on the liquid biopsy. Blood. 129(14):1947–1957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Park SI, Grover NS, Olajide O, Asch AS, Wall JG, Richards KL et al. A phase II trial of bendamustine in combination with rituximab in older patients with previously untreated diffuse 10.1111/bjh.14232. Epub 2016 Jul 22. PubMed PMID: 27448091; PubMed Central PMCID:

  50. Ciccolini J, Barbolosi D, Meille C, Lombard A, Serdjebi C, Giacometti S et al (2017) Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics-Based Mathematical Modeling Identifies an Optimal Protocol for Metronomic Chemotherapy. Cancer Res 77(17):4723–4733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kerbel RS (2017) Shaked Y The potential clinical promise of 'multimodality' metronomic chemotherapy revealed by preclinical studies of metastatic disease. Cancer Lett 400:293–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cerrito MG, De Giorgi M, Pelizzoni D, Bonomo SM, Digiacomo N, Scagliotti A et al (2018) Metronomic combination of Vinorelbine and 5Fluorouracil is able to inhibit triple-negative breast cancer cells. Results from the proof-of-concept VICTOR-0 study. Oncotarget. 9(44):27448–27459

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. André N, Tsai K, Carré M, Pasquier E (2017 May) Metronomic Chemotherapy: Direct Targeting of Cancer Cells after all? Trends Cancer 3(5):319–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Buckstein R, Kerbel RS, Shaked Y, Nayar R, Foden C, Turner R et al (2006) High-Dose celecoxib and metronomic "low-dose" cyclophosphamide is an effective and safe therapy in patients with relapsed and refractory aggressive histology non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 12(17):5190–5198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

M Christina Cox : performed the research, designed the research study, analysed the data, wrote the paper.

Sabrina Pelliccia: performed the research, analysed the data, wrote the paper

Luigi Marcheselli: designed the research study, analysed the data, wrote the paper

Roberta Battistini: performed the research, wrote the paper

Annalisa Arcari: performed the research, designed the research study, wrote the paper

Paola Anticoli Borza: performed the research, wrote the paper

Caterina Patti: performed the research, wrote the paper

Ivana Casaroli: performed the research, wrote the paper

Francesca di Landro: performed the research, wrote the paper

Arianna Di Napoli: performed the research, wrote the paper wrote the paper

Francesca Fabbri: performed the research, wrote the paper

Matteo Caridi: analysed the data, wrote the paper

Agostino Tafuri: performed the research, wrote the paper

Guido Bocci: designed the research study, analysed the data, wrote the paper

Gerardo Musuraca: performed the research, designed the research study, analysed the data, wrote the paper

Funding

The work was supported by the Department of Oncological science, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Sant’Andrea, Rome, Italy

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. Christina Cox or Guido Bocci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author M Christina Cox declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Sabrina Pelliccia, declares that she has no conflict of interest,

Author Luigi Marcheselli, declares that he has no conflict of interest;

Author Roberta Battistini, declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Annalisa Arcari, declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Paola Anticoli Borza, declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Caterina Patti , declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Ivana Casaroli , declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Francesca di Landro , declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Arianna Di Napoli, declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Francesca Fabbri, declares that she has no conflict of interest;

Author Matteo Caridi, declares that he has no conflict of interest;

Author Agostino Tafuri , declares that he has no conflict of interest;

Author Guido Bocci , declares that he has no conflict of interest;

Author Gerardo Musuraca,, declares that he has no conflict of interest;

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Sapienza ethics committee (EC approval n° 4640).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 161 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 23 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 25 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 26 kb)

ESM 5

(DOCX 15 kb)

ESM 6

(DOCX 14 kb)

ESM 7

(DOCX 13 kb)

ESM 8

(DOCX 13 kb)

ESM 9

(DOCX 12 kb)

ESM 10

(DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox, M.C., Pelliccia, S., Marcheselli, L. et al. The metronomic all-oral DEVEC is an effective schedule in elderly patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. Invest New Drugs 37, 548–558 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00769-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00769-5

Keywords

Navigation