Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase II study evaluating axitinib in patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Axitinib is an oral, potent, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor with selective inhibition of VEGFR 1,2, 3, as well as inhibition of potential downstream effectors of the EGFR pathway. Given the upregulation of EGFR and VEGFR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, treatment with axitinib holds promise as a rational targeted therapy. Patients and Methods Patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were included in this open label, single arm, phase II trial. Primary endpoint was 6 month progression free survival. All patients received single agent axitinib with planned dose escalation based on tolerability. A planned interim efficacy analysis was performed after enrollment of 30 patients. Results Forty-two patients were registered, 30 were evaluable. While treatment was well-tolerated with no severe bleeding events, only 19 patients were able to achieve full planned dose. The best overall response rate was 6.7 % (two partial responses) with a disease control rate of 76.7 %. Median progression free survival was 3.7 months (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 3.5–5.7) and overall survival was 10.9 months (95 % CI: 6.4–17.8). Exploratory analysis demonstrated that patients with a smaller sum of diameter of target lesions experienced improved response rates, and better progression-free and overall survival. Conclusion Treatment with single agent axitinib should be considered due to acceptable toxicity profile and favorable median overall survival compared to standard therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hutson TE, Lesovoy V, Al-Shukri S, et al (2013) Axitinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:1287–1294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Tomczak P, et al (2013) Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:552–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Locati LD, Licitra L, Agate L, et al (2014) Treatment of advanced thyroid cancer with axitinib: phase 2 study with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and quality-of-life assessments. Cancer 120:2694–2703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen EE, Tortorici M, Kim S, et al (2014) A phase II trial of axitinib in patients with various histologic subtypes of advanced thyroid cancer: long-term outcomes and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74:1261–1270

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu-Lowe DD, Zou HY, Grazzini ML, et al (2008) Nonclinical antiangiogenesis and antitumor activities of axitinib (AG-013736), an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases 1, 2, 3. Clin Cancer Res 14:7272–7283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiller JH, Larson T, Ou SH, et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of axitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 27:3836–3841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furnival GM, Wilson RW (1974) Regressions by leaps and bounds. Technometrics 16:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen EE, Kane MA, List MA, et al (2005) Phase II trial of gefitinib 250 mg daily in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 11:8418–8424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen MH, Williams GA, Sridhara R, et al (2003) FDA drug approval summary: gefitinib (ZD1839) (iressa) tablets. Oncologist 8:303–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart JS, Cohen EE, Licitra L, et al (2009) Phase III study of gefitinib compared with intravenous methotrexate for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [corrected]. J Clin Oncol 27:1864–1871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soulieres D, Senzer NN, Vokes EE, et al (2004) Multicenter phase II study of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 22:77–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson SK, Moon J, Huang CH, et al (2010) Phase II evaluation of sorafenib in advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: southwest oncology group study S0420. J Clin Oncol 28:3330–3335

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbert J, Schell MJ, Zhao X, et al (2015) A randomized phase II efficacy and correlative studies of cetuximab with or without sorafenib in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 51:376–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim HS, Kwon HJ, Jung I, et al (2015) Phase II clinical and exploratory biomarker study of dacomitinib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 21:544–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bechtold RE, Chen MY, Stanton CA, et al (2003) Cystic changes in hepatic and peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with gleevec. Abdom Imaging 28:808–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Linton KM, Taylor MB, Radford JA (2006) Response evaluation in gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated with imatinib: misdiagnosis of disease progression on CT due to cystic change in liver metastases. Br J Radiol 79:e40–e44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benjamin RS, Choi H, Macapinlac HA, et al (2007) We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST. J Clin Oncol 25:1760–1764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, et al (2007) Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol 25:1753–1759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goh V, Ganeshan B, Nathan P, et al (2011) Assessment of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell cancer: CT texture as a predictive biomarker. Radiology 261:165–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kambadakone A, Yoon SS, Kim TM, et al (2015) CT perfusion as an imaging biomarker in monitoring response to neoadjuvant bevacizumab and radiation in soft-tissue sarcomas: comparison with tumor morphology, circulating and tumor biomarkers, and gene expression. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W11–W18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fakhry C, Westra WH, Li S, et al (2008) Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:261–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al (2011) Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29:4294–4301

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al (2010) Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 363:24–35

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang H, Zhang B, Chen W, et al (2012) Human papillomavirus infection and prognostic predictors in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:891–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waugh DJ, Wilson C (2008) The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:6735–6741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Petreaca ML, Yao M, Liu Y, et al (2007) Transactivation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 by interleukin-8 (IL-8/CXCL8) is required for IL-8/CXCL8-induced endothelial permeability. Mol Biol Cell 18:5014–5023

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gyanchandani R, Sano D, Ortega Alves MV, et al (2013) Interleukin-8 as a modulator of response to bevacizumab in preclinical models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 49:761–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Le QT, Fisher R, Oliner KS, et al (2012) Prognostic and predictive significance of plasma HGF and IL-8 in a phase III trial of chemoradiation with or without tirapazamine in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18:1798–1807

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rischin D, Peters LJ, O'Sullivan B, et al (2010) Tirapazamine, cisplatin, and radiation versus cisplatin and radiation for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (TROG 02.02, HeadSTART): a phase III trial of the trans-Tasman radiation oncology group. J Clin Oncol 28:2989–2995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was approved and funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul L. Swiecicki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swiecicki, P.L., Zhao, L., Belile, E. et al. A phase II study evaluating axitinib in patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. Invest New Drugs 33, 1248–1256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0293-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0293-8

Keywords

Navigation