Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase 1b study of the oral gemcitabine ‘Pro-drug’ LY2334737 in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

  • PHASE I STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background This Phase 1b study aimed to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose of LY2334737, an oral pro-drug of gemcitabine, in combination with capecitabine, an oral pro-drug of 5-fluorouracil, in patients with advanced solid tumors. In addition, pharmacokinetics (PK) and tumor response were evaluated. Patients and methods Patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors received 650 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily (BID) and escalating doses of LY2334737 once daily (QD; initial dose 10 mg/day), both for 14 days followed by 7-day drug holiday. Cycles were repeated until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Results Fifteen patients received a median of 2 (range 1–7) treatment cycles; 14 patients discontinued due to PD, 1 due to toxicity (pyrexia). LY2334737 doses up to 40 mg/day were explored. Three dose-limiting toxicities were reported by 2 patients (fatigue, diarrhea, hyponatremia; all Grade 3). Seven patients achieved stable disease. Enrollment was stopped after unexpected hepatic toxicities were observed with LY2334737 QD in a study of Japanese patients. PK parameters for LY2334737 were consistent with the first-in-human study of LY2334737; PK data after 14 day combination treatment revealed no drug-drug interactions between LY2334737 and capecitabine. Conclusions No drug interactions or unexpected toxicities were observed in US patients when LY2334737 at doses up to 40 mg/day was administered QD in combination with capecitabine BID; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pratt SE, Durland-Busbice S, Shepard RL, Heinz-Taheny K, Iversen PW, Dantzig AH (2013) Human carboxylesterase-2 hydrolyzes the prodrug of gemcitabine (LY2334737) and confers prodrug sensitivity to cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 19:1159–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gemzar Summary of Product Characteristics (2011) Available at: http://www.medicines.ie/medicine/8346/SPC/Gemzar/. Accessed on 11 February 2013

  3. Koolen SL, Witteveen PO, Jansen RS, Langenberg MH, Kronemeijer RH, Nol A, Garcia-Ribas I, Callies S, Benhadji KA, Slapak CA, Beijnen JH, Voest EE, Schellens JH (2011) Phase I study of oral gemcitabine prodrug (LY2334737) alone and in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 17:6071–6082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pratt SE, Durland-Busbice S, Shepard RL, Donoho GP, Starling JJ, Wickremsinhe ER, Perkins EJ, Dantzig AH (2013) Efficacy of low-dose oral metronomic dosing of the prodrug of gemcitabine, LY2334737, in human tumor xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther 12:481–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL (2009) Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:708–720

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xeloda Summary of Product Characteristics (2014) Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/4619. Accessed 21 October 2014

  7. Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, Valle JW, Smith D, Steward W, Harper PG, Dunn J, Tudur-Smith C, West J, Falk S, Crellin A, Adab F, Thompson J, Leonard P, Ostrowski J, Eatock M, Scheithauer W, Herrmann R, Neoptolemos JP (2009) Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5513–5518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Veltkamp SA, Hillebrand MJ, Rosing H, Jansen RS, Wickremsinhe ER, Perkins EJ, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH (2006) Quantitative analysis of gemcitabine triphosphate in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells using weak anion-exchange liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 41:1633–1642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamamoto N, Nokihara H, Yamada Y, Uenaka K, Sekiguchi R, Makiuchi T, Slapak CA, Benhadji KA, Tamura T (2013) Phase I study of oral gemcitabine prodrug (LY2334737) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 71:1645–1655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Keating MJ, Abbruzzese J, Tarassoff P, Plunkett W (1990) Pharmacologically directed design of the dose rate and schedule of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (Gemcitabine) administration in leukemia. Cancer Res 50:6823–6826

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel SR, Gandhi V, Jenkins J, Papadopolous N, Burgess MA, Plager C, Plunkett W, Benjamin RS (2001) Phase II clinical investigation of gemcitabine in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and window evaluation of dose rate on gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation. J Clin Oncol 19:3483–3489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, Hainsworth J, Hochster H, Lenzi R, Abbruzzese J (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: 30-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faivre SJ, Olszanski AJ, Weigang-Koehler K, Riess H, Peng G, Callies S, Benhadji KA, Raymond E (2012) Phase I and pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) study of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Abstract. J Clin Oncol 30(suppl): abstr 2554

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study has been funded by Eli Lilly and Company. We would like to thank all patients for participating in the study. Karin Helsberg and Michael Riley, Trilogy Writing & Consulting, Frankfurt, Germany, provided medical writing support on behalf of Eli Lilly and Company.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. KAB and SC are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. JRI, GKD, GF, WWM, JB, and AAA have no no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex A. Adjei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Infante, J.R., Benhadji, K.A., Dy, G.K. et al. Phase 1b study of the oral gemcitabine ‘Pro-drug’ LY2334737 in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 33, 432–439 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0207-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0207-9

Keywords

Navigation