Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

  • PHASE I STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background Pazopanib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor shown to be clinically active in the treatment of various cancer types. This study aimed to evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), safety, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in adult patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and methods This was a Phase I, 3 + 3 design, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT0050943; VEG108925) conducted in sequential cohorts to determine the MTR of pazopanib and irinotecan administered with cetuximab. Twenty-five patients received treatment in three dosing cohorts and were evaluated for safety and tolerability of the combination and pharmacokinetics of individual drugs. Results The MTR was determined to be 400 mg pazopanib per day orally in combination with 150 mg/m2 irinotecan biweekly and 250 mg/m2 cetuximab weekly by infusion. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetic results suggested that the overall systemic exposure to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, was affected by pazopanib to a greater extent than was the systemic exposure to irinotecan itself. Conclusions This study provided evidence for the manageable safety profile and feasibility of using the novel triplet combination of pazopanib, irinotecan, and cetuximab in patients with refractory mCRC. Further large-scale Phase II studies are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tonini G, Calvieri A, Vincenzi B, Santini D (2009) First-line targeted therapies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer - role of cetuximab. Onco Targets Ther 2:73–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD et al (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355(9209):1041–1047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18(16):2938–2947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26(12):2013–2019. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2335–2342. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ et al (2007) Bevacizumab in combination with Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern cooperative oncology group study E3200. J Clin Oncol 25(12):1539–1544. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S et al (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(4):337–345. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa033025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A et al. (2007) Cetuximab plus 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) versus FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OPUS, a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 25(18S):abstr 4035

  9. Van Cutsem E, Nowacki M, Lang I et al. (2007) Randomized phase III study of irinotecan and 5-FU/FA with or without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The CRYSTAL trial. J Clin Oncol 25 (18S):abstr 4000

  10. Castaneda CA, Gomez HL (2009) Pazopanib: an antiangiogenic drug in perspective. Future Oncol 5(9):1335–1348. doi:10.2217/fon.09.112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedlander M, Hancock KC, Rischin D et al (2010) A phase II, open-label study evaluating pazopanib in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 119(1):32–37. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iwamoto FM, Lamborn KR, Robins HI et al (2010) Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi-targeted angiogenesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblastoma (North American brain tumor consortium study 06–02). Neuro Oncol 12(8):855–861. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noq025

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J et al (2010) Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 28(6):1061–1068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor SK, Chia S, Dent S et al (2010) A phase II study of pazopanib in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: a trial of the princess margaret hospital phase II consortium. Oncologist 15(8):810–818. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0081

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tan AR, Dowlati A, Jones SF et al (2010) Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncologist 15(12):1253–1261. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0095

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jain RK (2005) Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 307(5706):58–62. doi:10.1126/science.1104819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergers G, Benjamin LE (2003) Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat Rev Cancer 3(6):401–410. doi:10.1038/nrc1093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scagliotti G, Govindan R (2010) Targeting angiogenesis with multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 15(5):436–446. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0225

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chu C, Noel-Hudson MS, Boige V et al (2013) Therapeutic efficiency of everolimus and lapatinib in xenograft model of human colorectal carcinoma with KRAS mutation. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 27(4):434–442. doi:10.1111/j.1472-8206.2012.01035.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hurwitz HI, Dowlati A, Saini S et al (2009) Phase I trial of pazopanib in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15(12):4220–4227. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yau T, Chen PJ, Chan P et al (2011) Phase I dose-finding study of pazopanib in hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of early efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Clin Cancer Res 17(21):6914–6923. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Arnold D, Hohler T, Dittrich C et al (2008) Cetuximab in combination with weekly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FUFOX) in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase Ib/II study of the AIO GI Group. Ann Oncol 19(8):1442–1449. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD et al (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352(9138):1413–1418. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02309-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(1):23–30. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.09.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR et al (2009) American society of clinical oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol 27(12):2091–2096. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J et al (2008) KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol 19(3):508–515. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sohn BS, Kim TW, Lee JL et al (2009) The role of KRAS mutations in predicting the efficacy of cetuximab-plus-irinotecan therapy in irinotecan-refractory Korean metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Oncology 77(3–4):224–230. doi:10.1159/000236046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT et al (2011) Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. Ann Oncol 22(7):1535–1546. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I et al (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29(15):2011–2019. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

GlaxoSmithKline would like to acknowledge Vina Bachoo and Dr. Mamta Chawla at Kinapse Ltd for their role in the preparation of this manuscript. Editorial assistance was also provided by ProEd Communications, Inc.

Conflict of interest statement

A. B. Suttle, C. Wixon, and C. de Labareyre are employees of GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Editorial support for this report was also funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

Ethical standards

The study was conducted in accordance with the current laws of the country in which it was conducted (France).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Pierre Delord.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bennouna, J., Deslandres, M., Senellart, H. et al. A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Invest New Drugs 33, 138–147 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0142-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0142-1

Keywords

Navigation