Investigational New Drugs

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 463–471 | Cite as

A phase II study evaluating bevacizumab in combination with fixed-dose rate gemcitabine and low-dose cisplatin for metastatic pancreatic cancer: is an anti-VEGF strategy still applicable?

  • Andrew H. Ko
  • Elizabeth Dito
  • Brian Schillinger
  • Alan P. Venook
  • Zhidong Xu
  • Emily K. Bergsland
  • Derrick Wong
  • Janet Scott
  • Jimmy Hwang
  • Margaret A. Tempero


Background: The role of bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor, in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to determine safety and efficacy in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving bevacizumab in combination with fixed-dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine and low-dose cisplatin. Methods: Eligible patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 at FDR infusion (10 mg/m2 per minute), cisplatin 20 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were monitored by computed tomography scans every two cycles and monthly serum CA19-9 measurements. Results: Of 52 patients eligible for analysis, ten (19.2%) had an unconfirmed response and 30 (57.7%) had stable disease. Of 35 patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 levels, 20 (57.1%) had ≥50% biomarker decline during treatment. Median time to tumor progression was 6.6 months and median survival was 8.2 months (estimated 1-year survival, 36%). Grade 3/4 toxicities possibly related to bevacizumab included thromboembolic events (15.1%), hypertension (13.2%), gastrointestinal bleeding (9.4%), cardiac events (7.5%), and bowel perforation (5.7%). Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor levels and circulating tumor cell concentration did not correlate with overall survival, either at baseline or after 2 months of therapy. Conclusions: This bevacizumab-containing study regimen is modestly effective in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, although occasional serious complications may occur. Given the negative results of CALGB 80303, future efforts should be focused on identifying those specific patients who are most likely to benefit from bevacizumab-based therapy.


Pancreatic cancer Chemotherapy Gemcitabine Fixed-dose rate Bevacizumab Vascular endothelial growth factor Phase II clinical trial 



Research support for this clinical trial was provided by Genentech, a Career Development Award from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the Rombauer Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund. It is registry number NCT00126633.


  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer statistics 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Korc M (2003) Pathways for aberrant angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer 2:8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luo J, Guo P, Matsuda K, Truong N, Lee A, Chun C, Cheng SY, Korc M (2001) Pancreatic cancer cell-derived vascular endothelial growth factor is biologically active in vitro and enhances tumorigenicity in vivo. Int J Cancer 92:361–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Itakura J, Ishiwata T, Friess H, Fujii H, Matsumoto Y, Buchler MW, Korc M (1997) Enhanced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human pancreatic cancer correlates with local disease progression. Clin Cancer Res 3:1309–1316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Itakura J, Ishiwata T, Shen B, Kornmann M, Korc M (2000) Concomitant over-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 85:27–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ikeda N, Adachi M, Taki T, Huang C, Hashida H, Takabayashi A, Sho M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, Hisanaga M, Nakano H, Miyake M (1999) Prognostic significance of angiogenesis in human pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 79:1553–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seo Y, Baba H, Fukuda T, Takashima M, Sugimachi K (2000) High expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with liver metastasis and a poor prognosis for patients with ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 88:2239–2245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hotz HG, Reber HA, Hotz B, Sanghavi PC, Yu T, Foitzik T, Buhr HJ, Hines OJ (2001) Angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 reduces human pancreatic cancer growth. J Gastrointest Surg 5:131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tokunaga T, Abe Y, Tsuchida T, Hatanaka H, Oshika Y, Tomisawa M, Yoshimura M, Ohnishi Y, Kijima H, Yamazaki H, Ueyama Y, Nakamura M (2002) Ribozyme mediated cleavage of cell-associated isoform of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits liver metastasis of a pancreatic cancer cell line. Int J Oncol 21:1027–1032PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoshida T, Sunamura M, Duda DG, Egawa S, Miyazaki S, Shineha R, Hamada H, Ohtani H, Satomi S, Matsuno S (2002) Gene therapy for pancreatic cancer using an adenovirus vector encoding soluble flt-1 vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Pancreas 25:111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ogawa T, Takayama K, Takakura N, Kitano S, Ueno H (2002) Anti-tumor angiogenesis therapy using soluble receptors: enhanced inhibition of tumor growth when soluble fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 is used with soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Cancer Gene Ther 9:633–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kindler HL, Friberg G, Singh DA, Locker G, Nattam S, Kozloff M, Taber DA, Karrison T, Dachman A, Stadler WM, Vokes EE (2005) Phase II trial of bevacizumab plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8033–8040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Oraefo E, Schrag D, Hurwitz H, McLeod HL, Mulcahy MF, Schilsky RL, Goldberg RM (2007) A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus bevacizumab versus gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A preliminary analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol, 2007 ASCO Annu Meet Proc Part I. 25:4508Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Keating MJ, Abbruzzese J, Tarassoff P, Plunkett W (1990) Pharmacologically directed design of the dose rate and schedule of 2’,2’-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) administration in leukemia. Cancer Res 50:6823–6826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA, Gravel D, Adams T, Nowak B, Mineishi S, Tarassoff P, Satterlee W, Raber MN et al (1991) A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 9:491–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heinemann V, Quietzsch D, Gieseler F, Gonnermann M, Schonekas H, Rost A, Neuhaus H, Haag C, Clemens M, Heinrich B, Vehling-Kaiser U, Fuchs M, Fleckenstein D, Gesierich W, Uthgenannt D, Einsele H, Holstege A, Hinke A, Schalhorn A, Wilkowski R (2006) Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3946–3952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, Lledo G, Zampino MG, Andre T, Zaniboni A, Ducreux M, Aitini E, Taieb J, Faroux R, Lepere C, de Gramont A (2005) Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23:3509–3516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V, Biglietto M, Rabitti P, Uomo G, Cigolari S, Testa A, Maiello E, Lopez M (2002) Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell’Italia Meridionale. Cancer 94:902–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, Hainsworth J, Hochster H, Lenzi R, Abbruzzese J (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Poplin E, Levy DE, Berlin J, Rothenberg M, Cella D, Mitchell E, Alberts S, Benson A (2006) Phase III trial of gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) versus gemcitabine + oxaliplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201). J Clin Oncol 2006 ASCO Annu Meet Proc 24:LBA4004Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ko AH, Dito E, Schillinger B, Venook AP, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA (2006) Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine with cisplatin for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 24:379–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garcia JA, Rosenberg JE, Weinberg V, Scott J, Frohlich M, Park JW, Small EJ (2007) Evaluation and significance of circulating epithelial cells in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int 99:519–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Allard WJ, Terstappen LW, Hayes DF (2004) Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:781–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bergman AM, Ruiz van Haperen VW, Veerman G, Kuiper CM, Peters GJ (1996) Synergistic interaction between cisplatin and gemcitabine in vitro. Clin Cancer Res 2:521–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moufarij MA, Phillips DR, Cullinane C (2003) Gemcitabine potentiates cisplatin cytotoxicity and inhibits repair of cisplatin-DNA damage in ovarian cancer cell lines. Mol Pharmacol 63:862–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kanzawa F, Saijo N (1997) In vitro interaction between gemcitabine and other anticancer drugs using a novel three-dimensional model. Semin Oncol 24:S7–8–S7-16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heinemann V, Wilke H, Mergenthaler HG, Clemens M, Konig H, Illiger HJ, Arning M, Schalhorn A, Possinger K, Fink U (2000) Gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 11:1399–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Philip PA, Zalupski MM, Vaitkevicius VK, Arlauskas P, Chaplen R, Heilbrun LK, Adsay V, Weaver D, Shields AF (2001) Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 92:569–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cascinu S, Labianca R, Catalano V, Barni S, Ferrau F, Beretta GD, Frontini L, Foa P, Pancera G, Priolo D, Graziano F, Mare M, Catalano G (2003) Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy: a well-tolerated but ineffective chemotherapeutic regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. A report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD). Ann Oncol 14:205–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Louvet C, Andre T, Lledo G, Hammel P, Bleiberg H, Bouleuc C, Gamelin E, Flesch M, Cvitkovic E, de Gramont A (2002) Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 20:1512–1518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ko AH, Quivey JM, Venook AP, Bergsland EK, Dito E, Schillinger B, Tempero MA (2007) A phase II study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus low-dose cisplatin followed by consolidative chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:809–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Z’Graggen K, Centeno BA, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Jimenez RE, Werner J, Warshaw AL (2001) Biological implications of tumor cells in blood and bone marrow of pancreatic cancer patients. Surgery 129:537–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vogel I, Kruger U, Marxsen J, Soeth E, Kalthoff H, Henne-Bruns D, Kremer B, Juhl H (1999) Disseminated tumor cells in pancreatic cancer patients detected by immunocytology: a new prognostic factor. Clin Cancer Res 5:593–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vogel I, Kalthoff H, Henne-Bruns D, Kremer B (2002) Detection and prognostic impact of disseminated tumor cells in pancreatic carcinoma. Pancreatology 2:79–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vogel I, Kalthoff H (2001) Disseminated tumour cells. Their detection and significance for prognosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic carcinomas. Virchows Arch 439:109–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew H. Ko
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Dito
    • 1
  • Brian Schillinger
    • 1
  • Alan P. Venook
    • 1
  • Zhidong Xu
    • 1
  • Emily K. Bergsland
    • 1
  • Derrick Wong
    • 1
  • Janet Scott
    • 1
  • Jimmy Hwang
    • 1
  • Margaret A. Tempero
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California at San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer CenterSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations