Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase I dose escalation study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies

  • Phase I Studies
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aims of this study were to determine the toxicity profile and the recommended dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies. Caelyx: 35 (DLI) or 40 (DLII) mg/m2/d1 was followed by 0.5 mg/m2/d topotecan daily for 5 days, every 4 weeks. Twenty-three patients received a total of 82 cycles. At DLII, 2/6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 7 days and febrile neutropenia. At DLI, 4/18 and 2/18 patients presented febrile neutropenia and grade 4 sustained neutropenia, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities were mild to moderate. One patient with ovarian cancer presented a complete response. The hematological toxicity was a dose limiting factor that led to the recommended dose of 35 mg/m2 Caelyx on day 1 with 0.5 mg/m2/d topotecan on days 1–5. This study results suggest that alternative schedules of this combination are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myers CE, Chabner BA (1990) Anthracyclines in Cancer Chemotherapy: Principles & Practice. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, pp. 356–381

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gabizon A, Shmeeda H, Barenholz Y (2003) Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Clin Pharmacokinet 42:419–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabizon AA, Barenholz Y, Bialer M (1993) Prolongation of the circulation time of doxorubicin encapsulated in liposomes containing a polyethylene glycol-derivatized phospholipid: Pharmacokinetic studies in rodents and dogs. Pharm Res 10:703–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gabizon A, Catane R, Uziely B, Kaufman B, Safra T, Cohen R, Martin F, Huang A, Barenholz Y (1994) Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes. Cancer Res 54:987–992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Northfelt DW, Martin FJ, Working P, Volberding PA, Russell J, Newman M, Amantea MA, Kaplan LD (1996) Doxorubicin encapsulated in liposomes containing surface-bound polyethylene glycol: pharmacokinetics, tumor localization, and safety in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Clin Pharmacol 36:55–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Symon Z, Peyser A, Tzemach D, Lyass O, Sucher E, Shezen E, Gabizon A (1999) Selective delivery of doxorubicin to patients with breast carcinoma metastases by stealth liposomes. Cancer 86:72–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Northfelt DW, Dezube BJ, Thommes JA, Miller BJ, Fischl MA, Friedman-Kien A, Kaplan LD, Du Mond C, Mamelok RD, Henry DH (1998) Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: Results of a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 16:2445–2451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon AN, Fleagle JT, Guthrie D, Parkin DE, Gore ME, Lacave AJ (2001) Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. J Clin Oncol 19:3312–3322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, Rosso R, Grischke E, Santoro A, Catane R, Kieback DG, Tomczak P, Ackland SP, Orlandi F, Mellars L, Alland L, Tendler C (2004) Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 15:440–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muggia FM, Hainsworth JD, Jeffers S, Miller P, Groshen S, Tan M, Roman L, Uziely B, Muderspach L, Garcia A, Burnett A, Greco FA, Morrow CP, Paradiso LJ, Liang LJ (1997) Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in refractory ovarian cancer: Antitumor activity and toxicity modification by liposomal encapsulation. J Clin Oncol 15:987–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Slichenmyer WJ, Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC, Kaufmann SH (1993) The current status of camptothecin analogues as antitumor agents. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:271–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bookman MA, Malmstrom H, Bolis G, Gordon A, Lissoni A, Krebs JB, Fields SZ (1998) Topotecan for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: An open-label phase II study in patients treated after prior chemotherapy that contained cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol 16:3345–3352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ormrod D, Spencer CM (1999) Topotecan: A review of its efficacy in small cell lung cancer. Drugs 58:533–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beran M, Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, Koller C, al-Bitar M, Arbuck S, Pierce S, Moore M, Abbruzzese JL, Andreeff M, Keating M, Estey E (1996) Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is active in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 88:2473–2479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunton CJ (2002) Management of treatment-related toxicity in advanced ovarian cancer. Oncologist 7(Suppl 5):11–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eder JP, Chan V, Wong J, Wong YW, Ara G, Northey D, Rizvi N, Teicher BA (1998) Sequence effect of irinotecan (CPT-11) and topoisomerase II inhibitors in vivo. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 42:327–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jonsson E, Fridborg H, Nygren P, Larsson R (1998) Synergistic interactions of combinations of topotecan with standard drugs in primary cultures of human tumor cells from patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54:509–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Whitacre CM, Zborowska E, Gordon NH, Mackay W, Berger NA (1997) Topotecan increases topoisomerase IIalpha levels and sensitivity to treatment with etoposide in schedule-dependent process. Cancer Res 57:1425–1428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. National Cancer Institute (1988) Guidelines for Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  20. WHO (1979) WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment, No. 40. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lotem M, Hubert A, Lyass O, Goldenhersh MA, Ingber A, Peretz T, Gabizon A (2000) Skin toxic effects of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomal doxorubicin. Arch Dermatol 136:1475–1480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ryan CW, Fleming GF, Janisch L, Ratain MJ (2000) A phase I study of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) with topotecan. Am J Clin Oncol 23:297–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamilton A, Hochster H, Rosenthal M, Chachoua A, Sorich J, Cahr M, Muggia F (2000) Continuous infusion topotecan (TP-CI) with Doxil (DX): A phase I study of dual Topoisomerase Inhibition. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:200a (Abstr 777)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salmon E, Mirhashemi R, Lambrou N, Almeida Z, Auguste F (2003) Topotecan and doxorubicin HCL liposome combination therapy in the treatment of recurrent/refractory ovarian cancer: A phase II study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:476 (Abstr 1911)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Penson RT, Seiden MV, Goodman A, Fuller AF Jr, Berkowitz RS (2004) Phase I trial of escalating doses of topotecan in combination with a fixed dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in women with mullerian malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 93:702–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Maestu I, Galan A, Giner V, Yuste A, Rodriguez A, Bosch C, Esquerdo G, Llorente R (2003) Treatment of platinum refractory/resistant ovarian cancer with pegylated liposomial doxorubicin hydrocloride and topotecan. Preliminary results of a phase IV study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:485 (Abstr 1948)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mirchandani D, Hochster H, Hamilton A, Liebes L, Yee H, Curtin JP, Lee S, Sorich J, Dellenbaugh C, Muggia FM (2005) Phase I study of combined pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with protracted daily topotecan for ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11(16):5912–5919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tolcher AW, O’Shaughnessy JA, Weiss RB, Zujewski J, Myhand RC, Schneider E, Hakim F, Gress R, Goldspiel B, Noone MH, Brewster LR, Gossard MR, Cowan KH (1997) A phase I study of topotecan followed sequentially by doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 3:755–760

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Seiden MV, Ng SW, Supko JG, Ryan DP, Clark JW, Lynch T, Huang KC, Kwiatkowski D, Skarin A, Eder JP Jr (2002) A phase I clinical trial of sequentially administered doxorubicin and topotecan in refractory solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 8:691–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rowinsky EK (2002) Weekly topotecan: An alternative to topotecan’s standard daily × 5 schedule? Oncologist 7:324–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Faivre.

Additional information

Comment: Hervé Ghesquières and Sandrine Faivre contributed equally to this work and shall be regarded as joint first authors.Conflicts of interest: None of the authors declared conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghesquières, H., Faivre, S., Djafari, L. et al. Phase I dose escalation study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies. Invest New Drugs 24, 413–421 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-006-7520-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-006-7520-2

Keywords

Navigation