Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II study of rubitecan, an oral camptothecin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have failed previous 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy

  • Phase II Studies
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background: Rubitecan (RFS-2000, 9NC, Orathecin™ is an orally bioavailable camptothecin analogue, with evidence of preclinical activity in colon cancer cell lines. We evaluated oral rubitecan (5 days on, 2 days rest per week) on a continuous schedule, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), who progressed after 5-flurouracil based chemotherapy. Patients and results: Fourteen eligible patients were treated with rubitecan at 1.5 mg/m2/day on a 5 day/week continuous schedule. Therapy was well tolerated with most adverse events in the mild to moderate category. Grade 3/4 toxicity consisting of anemia, diarrhea and elevated bilirubin was seen in 4 patients. No responses were seen in 13 evaluable patients. Overall median survival (95% confidence interval) was 10.1 (range 3.1–12.6) months, and median time to progression was 2.1 months. Conclusions: Administration of rubitecan was well tolerated, but this schedule does not appear to have clinical activity in patients with advanced previously treated CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ (2005) Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55:10–0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, Fuchs CS, Ramanathan RK, Williamson SK, Findlay BP, Pitot HC, Alberts SR (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22: 23–0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2335–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH, Berlin JD, Marshall JL, Ramanathan RK, Hart LL, Gupta S, Garay CA, Burger BG, Le Bail N, Haller DG (2003) Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 21: 2059–069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rougier P, Lepille D, Bennouna J, Marre A, Ducreux M, Mignot L, Hua A, Mery-Mignard D (2002) Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study. Ann Oncol 13:1558–567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD, Punt CJ, Hickish TF, Heikkila R, Johannesen TB, Starkhammar H, Topham CA, Awad L, Jacques C, Herait P (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giovanella BC, Stehlin JS, Wall ME, Wani MC, Nicholas AW, Liu LF, Silber R, Potmesil M (1989) DNA topoisomerase I-targeted chemotherapy of human colon cancer in xenografts. Science 246:1046–048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernacki RJ, Pera P, Gambacorta P, Brun Y, Greco WR (2000) In vitro antitumor activity of 9-nitro-camptothecin as a single agent and in combination with other antitumor drugs. Ann N Y Acad Sci 922:293–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaxel C, Kohn KW, Wani MC, Wall ME, Pommier Y (1989) Structure-activity study of the actions of camptothecin derivatives on mammalian topoisomerase I: evidence for a specific receptor site and a relation to antitumor activity. Cancer Res 49:1465–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider E, Hsiang YH, Liu LF (1990) DNA topoisomerases as anticancer drug targets. Adv Pharmacol 21:149–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL (2000) Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:905–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pizzolato JF, Saltz LB (2003) The camptothecins. Lancet 361:2235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verschraegen CF, Natelson EA, Giovanella BC, Kavanagh JJ, Kudelka AP, Freedman RS, Edwards CL, Ende K, Stehlin JS (1998) A phase I clinical and pharmacological study of oral 9-nitrocamptothecin, a novel water-insoluble topoisomerase I inhibitor. Anticancer Drugs 9:36–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saltz LB, Kemeny NE, Tong W, Harrison J, Berkery R, Kelsen DP (1997) 9-Aminocamptothecin by 72-h continuous intravenous infusion is inactive in the treatment of patients with 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 80:1727–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kindler HL, Avadhani A, Wade-Oliver K, Karrison T, Mani S, Vokes EE (2004) 9-Aminocamptothecin (9-AC) given as a 120-h. continuous infusion in patients with advanced adenocarcinomas of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction: A phase II trial of the University of Chicago phase II consortium. Invest New Drugs 22:323–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung LL, Ramanathan RK, Egorin MJ, Jin R, Belani CP, Potter DM, Strychor S, Trump DL, Walko C, Fakih M, Zamboni WC (2004) Pharmacokinetic studies of 9-nitrocamptothecin on intermittent and continuous schedules of administration in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 54:487–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva: WHO

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10: 1–0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schoffski P, Herr A, Vermorken JB, Van den BJ, Beijnen JH, Rosing H, Volk J, Ganser A, Adank S, Botma HJ, Wanders J (2002) Clinical phase II study and pharmacological evaluation of rubitecan in non-pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-significant effect of food intake on the bioavailability of the oral camptothecin analogue. Eur J Cancer 38:807–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pazdur R, Diaz-Canton E, Ballard WP, Bradof JE, Graham S, Arbuck SG, Abbruzzese JL, Winn R (1997) Phase II trial of 9-aminocamptothecin administered as a 72-h continuous infusion in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 15:2905–909

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stehlin JS, Giovanella BC, Natelson EA, De Ipolyi PD, Coil D, Davis B, Wolk D, Wallace P, Trojacek A (1999) A study of 9-nitrocamptothecin (RFS-2000) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Oncol 14:821–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zamboni WC, Jung LL, Egorin MJ, Potter DM, Friedland DM, Belani CP, Agarwala SS, Wong MM, Fakih M, Trump DL, Jin R, Strychor S, Vozniak M, Troetschel M, Ramanathan RK (2004) Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittently administered 9-nitrocamptothecin in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 10:5058–064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Loos WJ, Gelderblom H, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, de Jonge MJ (2000) Inter- and intrapatient variability in oral topotecan pharmacokinetics: implications for body-surface area dosage regimens. Clin Cancer Res 6:2685–689

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zamboni WC, Bowman LC, Tan M, Santana VM, Houghton PJ, Meyer WH, Pratt CB, Heideman RL, Gajjar AJ, Pappo AS, Stewart CF (1999) Interpatient variability in bioavailability of the intravenous formulation of topotecan given orally to children with recurrent solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 43:454–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Drengler RL, Kuhn JG, Schaaf LJ, Rodriguez GI, Villalona-Calero MA, Hammond LA, Stephenson JA Jr, Hodges S, Kraynak MA, Staton BA, Elfring GL, Locker PK, Miller LL, Von Hoff DD, Rothenberg ML (1999) Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 17:685–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramesh K. Ramanathan.

Additional information

Supported, in part, by grants from Supergen and NIH/NCCR/GCRC #5M01 RR 00056 to the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Medical Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, H., Stoller, R., Auber, M. et al. Phase II study of rubitecan, an oral camptothecin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have failed previous 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. Invest New Drugs 24, 359–363 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-006-6451-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-006-6451-2

Keywords

Navigation