Association between multifocal electroretinograms, optical coherence tomography and central visual sensitivity in advanced retinitis pigmentosa
- 287 Downloads
To investigate the association between automated perimetry, multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements in patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
Twenty-five patients with advanced RP were included. Central visual field sensitivity (VFS) was evaluated using an average of visual sensitivity value at central four test points during central 30-2 static automated perimetry. OCT imaging was conducted, and the inner and outer segment (IS/OS) line was classified into three groups: Group 1, absence; Group 2, partially intact; and Group 3, intact. Central retinal thickness (CRT) that is the retinal thickness of central 3.0 mm was also evaluated. Average amplitude and implicit time of N1 and P1 in ring 1 and 2 were measured on mfERG. Comparisons of VFS, mfERG and OCT among the three subgroups were performed following IS/OS integrity. Relationship among VFS, mfERG and CRT was evaluated by regression analysis.
Group 3 patients with an intact IS/OS line showed a better VFS, and amplitude of mfERG response than those of Group 1 and 2. VFS and amplitudes of mfERG were correlated significantly with CRT in linear regression analysis.
Disrupted IS/OS integrity was associated with visual dysfunction which was shown by decreased amplitude of mfERG response and reduced central VFS. CRT was significantly correlated with amplitude of mfERG response and central VFS. An eye with the more reduced CRT was associated with the worse amplitude of mfERG response and central VFS.
KeywordsMultifocal electroretinograms Optical coherence tomography Retinitis pigmentosa Visual field
Central retinal thickness
Inner and outer segment
Visual field sensitivity
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
- 7.Bainbridge JW, Smith AJ, Barker SS, Robbie S, Henderson R, Balaggan K, Viswanathan A, Holder GE, Stockman A, Tyler N, Petersen-Jones S, Bhattacharya SS, Thrasher AJ, Fitzke FW, Carter BJ, Rubin GS, Moore AT, Ali RR (2008) Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med 358(21):2231–2239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Maguire AM, Simonelli F, Pierce EA, Pugh EN Jr, Mingozzi F, Bennicelli J, Banfi S, Marshall KA, Testa F, Surace EM, Rossi S, Lyubarsky A, Arruda VR, Konkle B, Stone E, Sun J, Jacobs J, Dell’Osso L, Hertle R, Ma JX, Redmond TM, Zhu X, Hauck B, Zelenaia O, Shindler KS, Maguire MG, Wright JF, Volpe NJ, McDonnell JW, Auricchio A, High KA, Bennett J (2008) Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med 358(21):2240–2248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Busskamp V, Duebel J, Balya D, Fradot M, Viney TJ, Siegert S, Groner AC, Cabuy E, Forster V, Seeliger M, Biel M, Humphries P, Paques M, Mohand-Said S, Trono D, Deisseroth K, Sahel JA, Picaud S, Roska B (2010) Genetic reactivation of cone photoreceptors restores visual responses in retinitis pigmentosa. Science 329(5990):413–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr. (1998) Artificial vision. Eye (Lond). 12(Pt 3b):605–607Google Scholar
- 18.Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Sumaroka A, Windsor EA, Herrera W, White DA, Kaushal S, Naidu A, Roman AJ, Schwartz SB, Stone EM, Jacobson SG (2008) Retinal laminar architecture in human retinitis pigmentosa caused by rhodopsin gene mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(4):1580–1590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Andréasson SO, Sandberg MA, Berson EL (1998) Narrow-band filtering for monitoring low-amplitude cone electroretinograms in retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol 105(5):500–503Google Scholar
- 38.Chang LK, Koizumi H, Spaide RF (2008) Disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment-outer segment junction in eyes with macular holes. Retina 28(7):969–975Google Scholar