What is to be done? Reflections on Brian Palmer’s ‘Approaching Working-Class History as Struggle’
This commentary focuses on three issues: definitions of class, visions of the future, and notion of false consciousness. It argues that contemporary conditions call for the rebuilding of solidarity based on grounded engagement with actually existing circumstances.
KeywordsClass Futures False consciousness
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Bourdieu, P. 1986. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Butler, J., E. Laclau, and S. Žižek. 2000. Contingency, hegemony, universality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks trans. Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith. New York: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
- Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2005. Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Klein, N. 2014. This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space (trans. D. Nicholson-smith). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Lenin, V. 1969. What is to be done? Burning questions of our movement. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
- Scott, A. 1990. Ideology and the new social movements. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Žižek, S. 1999. The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.Google Scholar