Designs, Codes and Cryptography

, Volume 44, Issue 1–3, pp 115–132 | Cite as

The flag-transitive symmetric designs with 45 points, blocks of size 12, and 3 blocks on every point pair

  • Cheryl E. Praeger


We construct two flag-transitive designs with the parameters of the title, and prove that these are the only two examples. One is point-primitive and related to unitary geometry, while the other is point-imprimitive and constructed from a 1-dimensional affine space. This classification may be contrasted with a construction by Mathon and Spence in 1996 of more than 3,700 designs with these parameters, almost a third of which had a trivial automorphism group.


Symmetric design Automorphism group Flag-transitive design 

AMS Classifications

05B25 20B25 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Buekenhout F, Delandtsheer A, Doyen J, Kleidman P, Liebeck MW and Saxl J (1990). Linear space with flag-transitive automorphism groups. Geometriae Dedicata 36: 89–94 MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cayley A (1849). On the triple tangent planes of surfaces of the third order. Cambridge Dublin Math J 4: 118–132 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conway JH, Curtis RT, Norton SP, Parker RA and Wilson RA (1985). Atlas of finite groups. Clarendon Press, Oxford MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dembowski P (1968). Finite geometries. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dixon JD and Mortimer B (1996). Permutation groups. Springer, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.4; 2004, ( Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirschfeld JWP (1985). Finite projective spaces of three dimensions. Clarendon Press, Oxford MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hughes DR, Piper FC (1985) Design theory. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huppert B (1967). Endliche Gruppen. I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hussain QM (1945). On the totality of the solutions for the symmetrical incomplete block designs λ = 2, κ = 5 or 6. Sankhya 7: 115–123 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lander ES (1983) Symmetric designs: an algebraic approach. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series 74, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mathon R and Spence E (1996). On 2-(45,12,3) designs. J Combin Des 4: 155–175 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Reilly Regueiro E (2005). On primitivity and reduction for flag-transitive symmetric designs. J Combin Theory Ser A 109: 135–148 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Praeger CE and Zhou S (2006). Imprimitive, flag-transitive symmetric designs. J Combin Theory Ser A 113: 1381–1395 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salmon G (1849). On the triple tangent planes to a surface of the third order. Cambridge Dublin Math J 4: 252–260 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sane SS (1984) On a class of symmetric designs. In Combinatorics and applications (Calcutta, 1982), Indian Statist. Inst., Calcutta, pp 292–302Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sims CC (1967) Computational methods in the study of permutation groups, in Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 169–183Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematics and Statistics (M019) University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations