A Stepwise Evaluation of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure to Optimize the Indication for Urgent Liver Transplantation

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) is a dynamic but reversible disease.

Aim

We aimed to clarify whether the change in Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B-ACLF (COSSH-ACLF) grade in HBV-ACLF patients can be used to predict prognosis, and to explore the appropriate conditions for performing urgent liver transplantation.

Methods

We assessed the COSSH-ACLF grades of HBV-ACLF patients at different time points from June 2013 to May 2019 at Huashan Hospital in Shanghai, China, and analyzed the relationship between the change in grade and patient prognosis.

Results

A total of 207 HBV-ACLF patients were enrolled, of which 79 underwent urgent liver transplantation. Their COSSH-ACLF grades were calculated at diagnosis, 3–7 days after diagnosis, and on the final day. Most of the final ACLF grades were consistent with their corresponding grades at days 3–7 after diagnosis (62.5%), while only 44.5% were in accordance with the initial grades at diagnosis. In patients who had a poor prognosis (initial ACLF-3 and ACLF-2 or -3 at days 3–7), the 28-day survival rate was 93.3% in those who underwent transplantation and 6.8% in those who did not (P < 0.0001). However, in patients who had a good prognosis (ACLF-0 or ACLF-1 at days 3–7), the 28-day survival rate was 100% in transplanted patients and 91.5% in non-transplanted patients (P = 0.236).

Conclusions

Reevaluation of the COSSH-ACLF grade 3–7 days after diagnosis could potentially show an indication for urgent liver transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Bernal W, Jalan R, Quaglia A, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure. Lancet. 2015;386:1576–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sarin SK, Kedarisetty CK, Abbas Z, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL) 2014. Hepatol Int. 2014;8:453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Moreau R, Jalan R, Gines P, et al. Acute on chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1426–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gustot T, Fernandez J, Garcia E, et al. Clinical course of acute-on chronic liver failure syndrome and effects on prognosis. Hepatology. 2015;62:243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    West J, Card TR, Aithal GP, Fleming KM. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among individuals with different aetiologies of cirrhosis: a population-based cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:983–990.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Marot A, Henrion J, Knebel JF, Moreno C, Deltenre P. Alcoholic liver disease confers a worse prognosis than HCV infection and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among patients with cirrhosis: an observational study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0186715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wu T, Li J, Shao L, et al. Development of diagnostic criteria and a prognostic score for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure. Gut.. 2018;67:2181–2191.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hernaez R, Solà E, Moreau R, Gines P. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: an update. Gut. 2017;66:541–553.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2016;64:433–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kamath PS, Kim WR, Advanced Liver Disease Study Group. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology.. 2007;45:797–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Massie AB, Chow EK, Wickliffe CE, et al. Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:659–667.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Brooks JT, Koizumi N, Neglia E, et al. Improved retransplant outcomes: early evidence of the share35 impact. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20:649–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Goel A, Kim WR, Pyke J, et al. Liver simulated allocation modeling: were the predictions accurate for share 35? Transplantation. 2018;102:769–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Murken DR, Peng AW, Aufhauser DD Jr, Abt PL, Goldberg DS, Levine MH. Same policy, different impact: center-level effects of share 35 liver allocation. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cholongitas E, Germani G, Burroughs AK. Prioritization for liver transplantation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bernardi M, Gitto S, Biselli M. The MELD score in patients awaiting liver transplant: strengths and weaknesses. J Hepatol. 2011;54:1297–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moore KP, Wong F, Gines P, et al. The management of ascites in cirrhosis: report on the consensus conference of the International Ascites Club. Hepatology. 2003;38:258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. Management of varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:823–832.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Arroyo V, Jiménez W. Complications of cirrhosis. II. Renal and circulatory dysfunction. Lights and shadows in an important clinical problem. J Hepatol. 2000;32:157–170.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Biggins SW, Kim WR, Terrault NA, et al. Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1652–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Abad-Lacruz A, Cabré E, González-Huix F, et al. Routine tests of renal function, alcoholism, and nutrition improve the prognostic accuracy of Child–Pugh score in nonbleeding advanced cirrhotics. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:382–387.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jalan R, Saliba F, Pavesi M, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic score to predict mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. J Hepatol. 2014;61:1038–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jalan R, Yurdaydin C, Bajaj JS, et al. Toward an improved definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Asrani SK, Simonetto DA, Kamath PS. Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:2128–2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Choudhury A, Jindal A, Maiwall R, et al. Liver failure determines the outcome in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): comparison of APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) and CLIF-SOFA models. Hepatol Int. 2017;11:461–471.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Shalimar S, Kumar D, Vairaja PK, et al. Acute on chronic liver failure because of acute hepatic insults: etiologies, course, extrahepatic organ failure and predictors of mortality. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:856–864.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bajaj JS, Oleary JG, Reddy KR, et al. Survival in infection-related acute-on-chronic liver failure is defined by extra-hepatic organ failures. Hepatology. 2014;60:250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fernández J, Acevedo J, Wiest R, et al. Bacterial and fungal infections in acute-on-chronic liver failure: prevalence, characteristics and impact on prognosis. Gut. 2018;67:1870–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hassanein TI, Tofteng F, Brown RS Jr, et al. Randomized controlled study of extracorporeal albumin dialysis for hepatic encephalopathy in advanced cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;46:1853–1862.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kribben A, Gerken G, Haag S, et al. Effects of fractionated plasma separation and adsorption on survival in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:782–789.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Banares R, Nevens F, Larsen FS, et al. Extracorporeal albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system in acute-on-chronic liver failure: the RELIEF trial. Hepatology. 2013;57:1153–1162.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Laleman W, Wilmer A, Evenepoel P, et al. Effect of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system and Prometheus devices on systemic haemodynamics and vasoactive agents in patients with acute-on-chronic alcoholic liver failure. Crit Care. 2006;10:R108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bañares R, Ibáñez-Samaniego L, Torner JM, et al. Meta-analysis of individual patient data of albumin dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: focus on treatment intensity. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2019;12:1756284819879565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Brandi from Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81670560) and National Science and Technology Major Project (2017ZX09304005, 2017ZX10202202) for their financial support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuxian Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Ying, Y., Zhou, P. et al. A Stepwise Evaluation of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure to Optimize the Indication for Urgent Liver Transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 66, 284–295 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06149-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Prognosis
  • Acute-on-chronic liver failure
  • Hepatitis B virus
  • Liver transplantation