Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Declining Rates of Referral for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Without Constipation at a Tertiary Care Center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Several treatments have been developed, including rifaximin for the treatment of IBS without constipation (non-IBS-C), but no studies have evaluated the effect of these therapies on patient referral rates to tertiary care gastroenterology clinics.

Aim

To assess referral patterns for IBS patients at a tertiary motility clinic over a 10-year period.

Methods

Data from consecutive patients referred to the clinic during 2006–2016 were analyzed. Trends in the proportion of referrals and prior rifaximin use in IBS-C versus non-IBS-C groups were compared.

Results

A total of 814 adult patients were referred to a single physician panel for IBS-related symptoms. Of these, 776 were included in the study [528 females (68%), average age 45.7 ± 15.9 years), comprising 431 IBS-C (55.5%) and 345 non-IBS-C (44.5%) patients. The proportion of non-IBS-C referrals declined significantly from 53.0% in 2006 to 27.3% in 2016 (Chi-square, p < 0.0001, Cochran–Armitage trend test p = 0.0001), and the proportion of IBS-C referrals increased significantly from 46.9% in 2006 to 72.7% in 2016 (Chi-square, p < 0.0001, Cochran–Armitage trend test p = 0.0004). Non-IBS-C referrals with prior rifaximin use significantly increased from 22.7% in 2006 to 66.7% in 2016 (Cochran–Armitage trend test, p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The results indicate a significantly declining tertiary care referral rate for non-IBS-C over the past decade. While not directly linked, there has been an increase in rifaximin use in the same population during the same time interval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford AC, Lacy BE, Talley NJ. Irritable bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2566–2578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lacy BE, Mearin F, Chang L, et al. Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1393-1407.e1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:712-721.e714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buono JL, Mathur K, Averitt AJ, Andrae DA. Economic burden of inadequate symptom control among US commercially insured patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. J Med Econ. 2017;20:353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Simrén M, Abrahamsson H, Svedlund J, Björnsson E. Quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome seen in referral centers versus primary care: the impact of gender and predominant bowel pattern. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Porsch U, Wanitschke R, Linhart P, et al. A consecutive study of patients with irritable bowel syndrome disease in two tertiary referral centers. Psychother Psych Med. 2001;51:267–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pimentel M. Evidence-based management of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. Am J Managed Care. 2018;24:S35–S46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hulisz D. The burden of illness of irritable bowel syndrome: current challenges and hope for the future. J Managed Care Pharm. 2004;10:299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chey WD, Chey WY, Heath AT, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of alosetron in women with severe diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. FDA Drug Safety Communication. FDA warns about increased risk of serious pancreatitis with irritable bowel drug Viberzi (eluxadoline) in patients without a gallbladder. Silver Spring: Food and Drug Administration; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pimentel M, Lembo A, Chey WD, et al. Rifaximin therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome without constipation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:22–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lembo A, Pimentel M, Rao SS, et al. Repeat treatment with rifaximin is safe and effective in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:1113–1121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Menees SB, Maneerattannaporn M, Kim HM, Chey WD. The efficacy and safety of rifaximin for the irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;107:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah E, Pimentel M. Evaluating the functional net value of pharmacologic agents in treating irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Therapeut. 2014;39:973–983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Armitage P. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics. 1955;11:375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Canavan C, West J, Card T. The epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:71–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:712-721 e714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chey WD, Kurlander J, Eswaran S. Irritable bowel syndrome: a clinical review. JAMA. 2015;313:949–958.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chandar AK. Diagnosis and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation in the primary-care setting: focus on linaclotide. Int J Gen Med. 2017;10:385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Engsbro AL, Begtrup LM, Kjeldsen J, et al. Patients suspected of irritable bowel syndrome—cross-sectional study exploring the sensitivity of Rome III criteria in primary care. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sommers T, Corban C, Sengupta N, et al. Emergency department burden of constipation in the United States from 2006 to 2011. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar L, Barker C, Emmanuel A. Opioid-induced constipation: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and management. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:141737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nipaporn Pichetshote.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Cedars-Sinai has licensing agreements with Salix Pharmaceuticals, Naia Pharmaceuticals, Gemelli Biotech, Inc., and Synthetic Biologics Inc. Mark Pimentel is a consultant for Salix Pharmaceuticals, Naia Pharmaceuticals, Synthetic Biologics Inc., Shire, and US Medical, is a board member of Gemelli Biotech and has received research funding from Salix Pharmaceuticals and Synthetic Biologics Inc. Ruchi Mathur is a board member of Gemelli Biotech and has received research funding from Valeant Pharmaceuticals and the American Diabetes Association. Ali Rezaie has received speaker and consultant fees from Commonwealth Laboratories, Actavis, and Salix Pharmaceuticals, and has received research funding from Valeant Pharmaceuticals, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the Kenneth Rainin Foundation. The remaining authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, S.J., Tashjian, V.C., Mirocha, J. et al. Declining Rates of Referral for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Without Constipation at a Tertiary Care Center. Dig Dis Sci 64, 182–188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5302-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5302-2

Keywords

Navigation