Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 63, Issue 12, pp 3434–3441 | Cite as

Microbial Biomarkers in Patients with Nonresponsive Celiac Disease

  • Liisa Viitasalo
  • Kalle KurppaEmail author
  • Merja Ashorn
  • Päivi Saavalainen
  • Heini Huhtala
  • Sara Ashorn
  • Markku Mäki
  • Tuire Ilus
  • Katri Kaukinen
  • Sari Iltanen
Original Article

Abstract

Background and Aims

In nonresponsive celiac disease (NRCD), the symptoms and duodenal damage persist despite a gluten-free diet. Celiac disease patients with persistent symptoms are found to have a dysbiotic microbiota. We thus hypothesized that increased seroreactivity to the serum gluten-sensitive microbial antibodies Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA), Pseudomonas fluorescens-associated sequence (I2), and Bacteroides caccae TonB-linked outer membrane protein (OmpW) is associated with NRCD.

Methods

ASCA, I2 and OmpW were measured in 20 seronegative CD patients with persistent villous damage despite strict dietary treatment (NRCD group). Fifty-eight responsive patients served as CD controls (55 on gluten-free treatment) and 80 blood donors as non-CD controls.

Results

At least one microbial marker was positive in 80% of NRCD patients, in 97% of untreated CD and 87% of treated CD patients, and in 44% of controls. NRCD patients had the highest frequency of ASCA positivity (65% vs 52, 20, and 0%, respectively) and also significantly higher ASCA IgA (median 14.5 U/ml) and IgG (32.5 U/ml) titers than treated CD patients (7.0 U/ml, 13.0 U/ml) and non-CD controls (4.5 U/ml, 5.8 U/ml). The frequencies of I2 and OmpW were lower in NRCD than in untreated CD (65% and 45% vs 86% and 59%, respectively), and I2 titers were higher in NRCD (median absorbance 0.76) and untreated (1.0) and treated (0.83) CD than controls (0.32). OmpW was elevated in untreated (1.1) and treated (0.94) CD patients compared with controls (0.79).

Conclusions

Seropositivity and high titers of ASCA are associated with NRCD and might serve as an additional follow-up tool in CD.

Keywords

Nonresponsive celiac disease Microbiota Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pseudomonas fluorescence Bacteroides caccae 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Jonathan Braun, M.D., Ph.D, Professor and Chair, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System for his support.

Funding

This study was supported by the Academy of Finland, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Area of Tampere University Hospital, the Foundation for Pediatric Research, the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation and State fund, Grant number Y1023G2017.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdulkarim AS, Burgart LJ, See J, Murray JA. Etiology of nonresponsive celiac disease: results of a systematic approach. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2016–2021.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leffler DA, Dennis M, Hyett B, Kelly E, Schuppan D, Kelly CP. Etiologies and predictors of diagnosis in nonresponsive celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stasi E, Marafini I, Caruso R, et al. Frequency and cause of persistent symptoms in celiac disease patients on a long-term gluten-free diet. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50:239–243.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ilus T, Kaukinen K, Virta LJ, et al. Refractory coeliac disease in a country with a high prevalence of clinically-diagnosed coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:418–425.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Palma G, Nadal I, Medina M, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis and reduced immunoglobulin-coated bacteria associated with coeliac disease in children. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:63.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sartor RB, Wu GD. Roles for intestinal bacteria, viruses, and fungi in pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases and therapeutic approaches. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:327.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iltanen S, Tervo L, Halttunen T, et al. Elevated serum anti-I2 and anti-OmpW antibody levels in children with IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:389–394.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashorn S, Honkanen T, Kolho KL, et al. Fecal calprotectin levels and serological responses to microbial antigens among children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:199–205.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Landers CJ, Cohavy O, Misra R, et al. Selected loss of tolerance evidenced by Crohn’s disease-associated immune responses to auto- and microbial antigens. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:689–699.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wacklin P, Laurikka P, Lindfors K, et al. Altered duodenal microbiota composition in celiac disease patients suffering from persistent symptoms on a long-term gluten-free diet. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1933–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forcione DG, Rosen MJ, Kisiel JB, Sands BE. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) positivity is associated with increased risk for early surgery in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2004;53:1117–1122.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papp M, Altorjay I, Dotan N, et al. New serological markers for inflammatory bowel disease are associated with earlier age at onset, complicated disease behavior, risk for surgery, and NOD2/CARD15 genotype in a Hungarian IBD cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:665–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arnott ID, Landers CJ, Nimmo EJ, et al. Sero-reactivity to microbial components in Crohn’s disease is associated with disease severity and progression, but not NOD2/CARD15 genotype. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2376–2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mow WS, Vasiliauskas EA, Lin YC, et al. Association of antibody responses to microbial antigens and complications of small bowel Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:414–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Granito A, Zauli D, Muratori P, et al. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae and perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in coeliac disease before and after gluten-free diet. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:881–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mallant-Hent RC, Mary B, von Blomberg E, et al. Disappearance of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in coeliac disease during a gluten-free diet. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ashorn S, Välineva T, Kaukinen K, et al. Serological responses to microbial antigens in celiac disease patients during a gluten-free diet. J Clin Immunol. 2009;29:190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Viitasalo L, Niemi L, Ashorn M, et al. Early microbial markers of celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:620–624.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubio-Tapia A, Kelly DG, Lahr BD, Dogan A, Wu TT, Murray JA. Clinical staging and survival in refractory celiac disease: a single center experience. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rubio-Tapia A, Murray JA. Classification and management of refractory celiac disease. Gut.. 2010;59:547–557.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taavela J, Koskinen O, Huhtala H, et al. Validation of morphometric analyses of small-intestinal biopsy readouts in celiac disease. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76163.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Järvinen TT, Kaukinen K, Laurila K, et al. Intraepithelial lymphocytes in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1332–1337.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sutton CL, Kim J, Yamane A, et al. Identification of a novel bacterial sequence associated with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:23–31.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wei B, Dalwadi H, Gordon LK, et al. Molecular cloning of a Bacteroides caccae TonB-linked outer membrane protein identified by an inflammatory bowel disease marker antibody. Infect Immun. 2001;69:6044–6054.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurppa K, Räsänen T, Collin P, et al. Endomysial antibodies predict celiac disease irrespective of the titers or clinical presentation. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:2511–2516.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gross S, van Wanrooij RL, Tack GJ, et al. Antibody titers against food antigens decrease upon a gluten-free diet, but are not useful for the follow-up of (refractory) celiac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:516–518.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaukinen K, Sulkanen S, Mäki M, Collin P. IgA-class transglutaminase antibodies in evaluating the efficacy of gluten-free diet in coeliac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:311–315.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mubarak A, Oudshoorn JH, Kneepkens CM, et al. A child with refractory coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53:216–218.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cenit MC, Olivares M, Codoner-Franch P, Sanz Y. Intestinal microbiota and celiac disease: cause, consequence or co-evolution? Nutrients. 2015;17(7):6900–6923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nistal E, Caminero A, Vivas S, et al. Differences in faecal bacteria populations and faecal bacteria metabolism in healthy adults and celiac disease patients. Biochimie. 2012;94:1724–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou G, Song Y, Yang W, et al. ASCA, ANCA, ALCA and many more: are they useful in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease? Dig Dis. 2016;34:90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vilela EG, Torres HO, Ferrari ML, Lima AS, Cunha AS. Gut permeability to lactulose and mannitol differs in treated Crohn’s disease and celiac disease patients and healthy subjects. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008;41:1105–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vermeire S, Peeters M, Vlietinck R, et al. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA), phenotypes of IBD, and intestinal permeability: a study in IBD families. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001;7:8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harrer M, Reinisch W, Dejaco C, et al. Do high serum levels of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies result from a leakiness of the gut barrier in Crohn’s disease? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:1281–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere Center for Child Health ResearchUniversity of Tampere and Tampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Genetics and Laboratory of Genetics, HUSLABUniversity of Helsinki and Helsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, and Department of Medical and Clinical GeneticsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of TampereTampereFinland
  5. 5.Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract SurgeryTampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  6. 6.Celiac Disease Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life SciencesUniversity of TampereTampereFinland
  7. 7.Department of Internal MedicineTampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  8. 8.Lapland Central HospitalRovaniemiFinland

Personalised recommendations