Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparison Between Community and Academic Practices in the USA in the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Entecavir: Results of the ENUMERATE Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

The management of chronic hepatitis B patients is not well characterized in real-world practice. We compared baseline characteristics of CHB patients on entecavir, the frequency of on-treatment monitoring, and the effectiveness of ETV treatment between academic and community practices.

Methods

Treatment-naïve CHB patients ≥18 years old, treated with ETV for ≥12 months from 2005 to 2013, in 26 community and academic practices throughout the USA were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Of 841 patients enrolled, 658 (65% male, 83% Asian, median age 47, 9% with cirrhosis) met inclusion criteria. Half of the patients (52%) were from community practices. A lower percentage of patients in community practices had cirrhosis or liver cancer (5 vs. 14%). Community practices more often treated patients with baseline ALT < 2 × ULN. Over a median follow-up of 4 years, community practices were more likely to discontinue ETV with less frequent laboratory monitoring compared to academic practices. The 5-year cumulative probability of ALT normalization was greater among patients treated in community practices (70 vs. 50%, p < 0.001), but the 5-year cumulative probability of undetectable HBV DNA was lower (45 vs. 70%, p < 0.001) than those treated in academic practices.

Conclusion

Academic practices saw CHB patients with more advanced liver disease, more often followed AASLD guidelines, and monitored patients on ETV treatment more frequently than community practices. While patients in community practices were less likely to achieve undetectable HBV DNA and more likely to achieve ALT normalization, the rates of HBeAg loss and seroconversion as well as HBsAg loss were similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

CHB:

Chronic hepatitis

ETV:

Entecavir

TDF:

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

HBeAg:

Hepatitis B e antigen

anti-HBe:

Hepatitis B e antibody

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

IRB:

Institutional review board

KM:

Kaplan–Meier

US:

USA

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

References

  1. Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, et al. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:1546–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kowdley KV, Wang CC, Welch S, et al. Prevalence of chronic hepatitis B among foreign-born persons living in the United States by country of origin. Hepatology. 2012;56:422–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinbaum M, Williams I, Mast E, et al. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008;57 (RR-8):1–20.

  4. Terrault NA, Lok AS, McMahon BJ, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 Hepatitis B Guidance. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29800.

  5. Sarkar M, Scvachko VA, Ready JB, et al. Characteristics and management of patients with chronic hepatitis B in an integrated care setting. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:2100–2108.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3142-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Giannini EG, Marenco S, Boni S, et al. Therapeutic management of chronic hepatitis B in clinical practice: a region-wide survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:228–234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arama V, Leblebicioglu H, Simon K, et al. Chronic Hepatitis B monitoring and treatment patterns in five European countries with different access and reimbursement policies. Antivir Ther. 2014;19:245–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang S, Ristau J, Trinh H, et al. Undertreatment of Asian chronic hepatitis B patients on the basis of standard guidelines: a community–based study. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2137-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn J, Lee HM, Lim JK, et al. Entecavir safety and effectiveness in a national cohort of treatment- naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in the US- the ENUMERATE study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;43:134–144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic Hepatitis B: Update 2009. Hepatology. 2009;50:1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keefe EB, Dietrich DT, Han SH, et al. A treatment of algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B infection in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keefe EB, Dietrich DT, Han SH, et al. A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B infection in the United States: 2008 update. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1315–1341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong MJ, Pan CQ, Hann HW, et al. The management of chronic hepatitis B in Asian Americans. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:3143–3162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tong MJ, Hsu L, Chang PW, et al. Evaluation of current treatment recommendations for chronic hepatitis B: a 2011 update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:829–835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009;50:227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai M, Hyatt BJ, Nasser I, et al. The clinical significance of persistently normal ALT in chronic hepatitis B infection. J Hepatol. 2007;47:760–767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang JW, Choi JY, Kim YS, et al. Long- term effect of antiviral therapy on disease course after decompensation in patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2015;61:1809–1820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sinn DH, Lee J, Goo J, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B virus-infected compensated cirrhosis patients with low viral load. Hepatology. 2015;62:694–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ha NB, Trinh HN, Nguyen HA, et al. Response to higher dose of entecavir 1.0 mg daily in patients with partial response to entecavir 0.5 mg daily. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:461–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang TT, Lai CL, Kew Yoon S, et al. Entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen- positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2010;51:422–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pol S, Lampertico P. First-line treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir or tenofovir in ‘real-life’ settings: from clinical trials to clinical practice. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19:377–386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ku K, Li J, Ha NB, et al. Chronic hepatitis B management based on standard guidelines in community primary care and specialty clinics. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:3626–3633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2889-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim LH, Nguyen VG, Trinh HN, et al. Gender disparity and real-life practice setting differences in actual treatment rates of patients with chronic hepatitis B. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:2091–2099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following ENUMERATE investigators and AHF members for their contributions: Daryl Lau: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Truong-Sinh Leduc: Leduc Medical Group; Albert Min: Mount Sinai Beth Israel, NYC, NY; Loc Trong Le: Woodholme Gastroenterology Associates; Ho Bae: Asian Pacific Liver Center; San Van Tran: Sang Van Tran PC; Son Do: Digestive Health Associates of Texas, Plano, TX; Hie-Won L. Hann: Jefferson University Hospitals; Clifford Wong: San Francisco, CA; Steve-Huy Han: UCLA; K. Rajender Reddy: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; James Park: New York University; Anjana Pillai: Emory University; Myron Tong: UCLA.

Author’s contribution

Hannah Lee, Joseph Ahn, Joseph Lim, W. Ray Kim, Calvin Pan, Mindie Nguyen, and Anna Lok helped in study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, obtained funding, and study supervision. Donghee Kim and Ajitha Mannalithara contributed to statistical analysis. Huy Trinh, Danny Chu, Tram Tran, Helen Te, and Jocelyn Woog helped in acquisition of data, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Funding

This study is supported by an investigator-initiated grant to the Asian Health Foundation by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah M. Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Hannah Lee and Joseph Ahn have no disclosures. Anna S. Lok has research grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences and NIH Grant U01 DK082863. Mindie Nguyen has research support from BMS, Gilead, Janssen, National Cancer Institute, Pfizer. She is on the Advisory board/consultant for Janssen, Novartis, Gilead, Alnylam, Dynavax, Spring Bank, Intercept. Calvin Pan is a speaker, consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb. Helen Te has research grant support from Abbvie, Conatus, Bristol-Myers Squibb. She is on the Advisory board for Bristol-Myers Squibb. Danny Chu is on the Advisory board and speaker’s bureau for Gilead Sciences. Tram Tran has Research grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. She is on the Advisory board for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. There is no other disclosures for all other authors.

Ethical statement

Hannah Lee confirms that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. Hannah Lee is acting as the submission’s guarantor and takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to published article. All authors approved the final version of the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H.M., Ahn, J., Kim, W.R. et al. A Comparison Between Community and Academic Practices in the USA in the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Entecavir: Results of the ENUMERATE Study. Dig Dis Sci 64, 358–366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5281-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5281-3

Keywords

Navigation