Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Biliary Bacterial Resistance in Patients with Frequent Biliary Instrumentation, One Size Does Not Fit All

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bacteremia due to cholangitis can occur as a complication of biliary instrumentation. Biliary sepsis can result from frequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Methods

We hypothesized that routine use of antibiotics in patients who require frequent ERCPs leads to cholangitis resistant to empiric antibiotics used to treat biliary sepsis. We retrospectively reviewed patients with frequent biliary instrumentation and blood stream infection due to cholangitis. Conventional empiric antibiotics were defined as broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for community-acquired infections and surgical prophylaxis. Broad-spectrum antibacterial agents used for hospital-onset/multidrug-resistant infections were defined as broad-spectrum MDR antibiotics.

Results

Seventy-eight patients had bacteremia secondary to cholangitis from biliary obstruction. Over 50% of bacteria were not sensitive to conventional empiric antibiotics for biliary sepsis. Thirty-seven patients did not receive post-procedural antibiotics and forty-one patients did. Of the ones who did, 58% later had a bloodstream infection with bacteria resistant to the antibiotic used for prophylaxis, and 26 patients (63%) required a broad-spectrum MDR antibiotic for treatment. The number of ERCPs was not associated with resistance to prophylactic antibiotics (p 0.7103) or needing broad-spectrum MDR antibiotics for treatment of cholangitis-associated bacteremia (p 0.1868). Routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis after ERCP was associated with trend toward need for broad-spectrum MDR antibiotics for cholangitis-associated bacteremia, Chi-square 3.7, 0 0.0540.

Conclusion

Bacterial resistance to conventional empiric antibiotics is an emerging problem. Blood cultures are needed to guide therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

CPT:

Current Procedural Terminology

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC)

MDR:

Multidrug resistant

IQR:

Interquartile range

References

  1. Ferreira LEDC, Baron TH. Acute biliary conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27:745–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miura F, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allison MC, Sandoe JA, Tighe R, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 2009;58:869–880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rerknimitr R, Fogel EL, Kalayci C, Esber E, Lehman GA, Sherman S. Microbiology of bile in patients with cholangitis or cholestasis with and without plastic biliary endoprosthesis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:885–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Melzer M, Toner R, Lacey S, Bettany E, Rait G. Biliary tract infection and bacteraemia: presentation, structural abnormalities, causative organisms and clinical outcomes. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:773–776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khashab MA, Chithadi KV, Acosta RD, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zimmer V, Lammert F. Acute bacterial cholangitis. Viszeralmedizin. 2015;31:166–172.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lan Cheong Wah D, Christophi C, Muralidharan V. Acute cholangitis: current concepts. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87:554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Englesbe MJ, Dawes LG. Resistant pathogens in biliary obstruction: importance of cultures to guide antibiotic therapy. HPB (Oxford). 2005;7:144–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yilmaz G, Aydin K, Koksal I, Caylan R, Akcay K, Arslan M. Post-ERCP bacteremia caused by Alcaligenes xylosoxidans in a patient with pancreas cancer. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006;5:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Center of Diseases Control (CDC). Antimicrobial Use and Resistance (AUR) Module. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/11pscAURcurrent.pdf.

  12. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindstrom E, Ansehn S, Ihse I, Anderberg B. Bacteremia following diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:444–449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauter G, Grabein B, Huber G, Mannes GA, Ruckdeschel G, Sauerbruch T. Antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A randomized controlled study. Endoscopy. 1990;22:164–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Niederau C, Pohlmann U, Lubke H, Thomas L. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in therapeutic or complicated diagnostic ERCP: results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:533–537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alveyn CG. Antimicrobial prophylaxis during biliary endoscopic procedures. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Byl B, Deviere J, Struelens MJ, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for infectious complications after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1236–1240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alveyn CG, Robertson DA, Wright R, Lowes JA, Tillotson G. Prevention of sepsis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Hosp Infect. 1991;19:65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamamoto N, Fujita J, Shinzato T, et al. In vitro activity of sitafloxacin compared with several fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus constellatus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;27:171–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaneko A, Sasaki J, Shimadzu M, Kanayama A, Saika T, Kobayashi I. Comparison of gyrA and parC mutations and resistance levels among fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates and laboratory-derived mutants of oral streptococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45:771–775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Silverman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masadeh, M., Chandra, S., Livorsi, D. et al. Evaluation of Biliary Bacterial Resistance in Patients with Frequent Biliary Instrumentation, One Size Does Not Fit All. Dig Dis Sci 63, 3474–3479 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5263-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5263-5

Keywords

Navigation