Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of Nucleoside Analogs for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Treatment: A Meta-Analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aim

The efficacy of nucleoside analogs (NAs) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these agents by conducting a comprehensive meta-analysis of available studies.

Methods

We searched several databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, and Web of Science, according to PRISMA guidelines. We considered all randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0.

Results

Twenty-one studies with 8752 participants were included in the final analysis. The pooled data showed that patients treated with NAs had significantly lower 1- and 3-year HCC recurrence rates (relative risk [RR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65–0.90; P = 0.001 and RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.88; P < 0.001, respectively), but there was no difference in 5-year recurrence rates (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74–1.03; P = 0.10). Regarding overall survival (OS), patients treated with NAs had significantly higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08; P = 0.003; RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16–1.34; P < 0.001; and RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18–1.39; P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

NA therapy has the potential to reduce the risk of early recurrence and improve OS in patients with HBV-related HCC after curative treatment, compared with placebo or no treatment. Further research including more homogeneous studies with large sample sizes is required to improve the reliability of these conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Truty MJ, Vauthey J-N. Surgical resection of high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection, preoperative considerations, and operative technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1219–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radio-frequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology. 1999;210:655–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology. 2003;228:235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC, Hsu CW, Chen YC. Radiofrequency ablation improves prognosis compared with ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma < or =4 cm. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1714–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC, Hsu CW, Chen YC. Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Gut. 2005;54:1151–1156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiina S, Teratani T, Obi S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunello F, Veltri A, Carucci P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giorgio A, Di Sarno A, De Stefano G, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to percutaneous ethanol injection in treatment of cirrhotic patients: an Italian randomized controlled trial. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:2291–2295.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weis S, Franke A, Mossner J, Jakobsen JC, Schoppmeyer K. Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:Cd003046.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology. 1999;30:1434–1440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kianmanesh R, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J. Selective approach to major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2003;12:51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chok KS, Ng KK, Poon RT, Lo CM, Fan ST. Impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcome of curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2009;96:81–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang J, Yan L, Cheng Z, et al. A randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for HCC conforming to the Milan criteria. Ann Surg. 2010;252:903–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:3030–3044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kubo S, Tanaka H, Takemura S, et al. Effects of lamivudine on outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with active replication of hepatitis B virus. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:94–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuzuya T, Katano Y, Kumada T, et al. Efficacy of antiviral therapy with lamivudine after initial treatment for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1929–1935.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida H, Yoshida H, Goto E, et al. Safety and efficacy of lamivudine after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int. 2008;2:89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chuma M, Hige S, Kamiyama T, et al. The influence of hepatitis B DNA level and antiviral therapy on recurrence after initial curative treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:991–999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed July 6, 2014.

  24. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei Q, Xu X, Ling Q, Zheng S. Indefinite antiviral therapy may be required after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic hepatitis. Bos J Res Med Sci. 2013;18:726–730.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yu Y, Ai J, Zhang W. Current clinical evidence for nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;11:925–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang X, Gao JY, Wang J, Cheng J. The impact of anti-HBV treatment on the occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: focus on Asian studies. Discov Med. 2015;19:89–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kubo S, Takemura S, Tanaka S, et al. Management of hepatitis B virus infection during treatment for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:8249–8255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan ZM, Sun BC. Effects of antiviral therapy on preventing liver tumorigenesis and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8895–8901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishikawa T. Anti-viral therapy to reduce recurrence and improve survival in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8861–8866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong GL, Tse YK, Chan HL, Yip TC, Tsoi KK, Wong VW. Oral nucleos(t)ide analogues reduce recurrence and death in chronic hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43:802–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu SL, Zhong JH, Ke Y, et al. Comparative efficacy of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization with or without antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol J Int Soc Oncodev Biol Med. 2015;36:6277–6284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gong WF, Zhong JH, Lu SD, et al. Effects of antiviral therapy on post-hepatectomy HBV reactivation and liver function in HBV DNA-negative patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:15047–15056.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhong JH, Ke Y, Zhu SL, et al. Adefovir dipivoxil is less expensive than lamivudine and associated with similar prognosis in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection. OncoTargets Therapy. 2016;9:6897–6907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang ZY, Zhou ZQ, Zhou GW. Higher efficacy of antiviral therapy after major hepatectomy in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma of less than 3 cm. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26:1116–1124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yeh YC, Liu CJ, Kuo RN, et al. Association of adjuvant antiviral therapy with risk of cancer progression and deaths in patients with hepatitis-B-virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma following curative treatment: a nationwide cohort study. PloS One. 2014;9:e102051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jin YJ, Shim JH, Lee HC, et al. Suppressive effects of entecavir on hepatitis B virus and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1380–1388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Urata Y, Kubo S, Takemura S, et al. Effects of antiviral therapy on long-term outcome after liver resection for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:685–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang T, Lu JH, Zhai J, et al. High viral load is associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:683–691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ke Y, Ma L, You XM, et al. Antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy. Cancer Biol Med. 2013;10:158–164.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yin J, Li N, Han Y, et al. Effect of antiviral treatment with nucleotide/nucleoside analogs on postoperative prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-stage longitudinal clinical study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3647–3655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Koda M, Nagahara T, Matono T, et al. Nucleotide analogs for patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma increase the survival rate through improved liver function. Intern Med. 2009;48:11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li N, Lai EC, Shi J, et al. A comparative study of antiviral therapy after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in the immune-active phase of hepatitis B virus infection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chan AC, Chok KS, Yuen WK, et al. Impact of antiviral therapy on the survival of patients after major hepatectomy for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2011;146:675–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu CY, Chen YJ, Ho HJ, et al. Association between nucleoside analogues and risk of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following liver resection. JAMA. 2012;308:1906–1914.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yan Q, Ni J, Zhang GL, et al. Efficacy of postoperative antiviral combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy in prevention of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126:855–859.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Nishikawa H, Nishijima N, Arimoto A, et al. Effect of nucleoside analog use in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2014;44:608–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chong CC, Wong GL, Wong VW, et al. Antiviral therapy improves post-hepatectomy survival in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective-retrospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sakamoto K, Beppu T, Hayashi H, et al. Antiviral therapy and long-term outcome for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative liver resection in a Japanese cohort. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:1647–1655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen JL, Lin XJ, Zhou Q, Shi M, Li SP, Lao XM. Association of HBV DNA replication with antiviral treatment outcomes in the patients with early-stage HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing curative resection. Chin J Cancer. 2016;35:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lee TY, Lin JT, Zeng YS, Chen YJ, Wu MS, Wu CY. Association between nucleos(t)ide analog and tumor recurrence in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Hepatology. 2016;63:1517–1527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sohn W, Kang TW, Choi SK, et al. Effect of oral antiviral treatment on long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation therapy for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:47794–47807.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Wei Q, Tian H, Luo HX, et al. Better prognosis of hepatic resection combined with antiviral therapy for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma with BCLC Stage B/C. Asian J Surg. 2017;40:453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Huang G, Lau WY, Wang ZG, et al. Antiviral therapy improves postoperative survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261:56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wong JS, Wong GL, Tsoi KK, et al. Meta-analysis: the efficacy of anti-viral therapy in prevention of recurrence after curative treatment of chronic hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:1104–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun P, Dong X, Cheng X, Hu Q, Zheng Q. Nucleot(s)ide analogues for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Wu L, Li B. Antiviral therapy decreases recurrence of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection: a meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014;38:2395–2402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Xia BW, Zhang YC, Wang J, Ding FH, He XD. Efficacy of antiviral therapy with nucleotide/nucleoside analogs after curative treatment for patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39:458–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Liu GM, Huang XY, Shen SL, Hu WJ, Peng BG. Adjuvant antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatol Res. 2016;46:100–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hung IF, Poon RT, Lai CL, Fung J, Fan ST, Yuen MF. Recurrence of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with high viral load at the time of resection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1663–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wu JC, Huang YH, Chau GY, et al. Risk factors for early and late recurrence in hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2009;51:890–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen L, Zhang Q, Chang W, Du Y, Zhang H, Cao G. Viral and host inflammation-related factors that can predict the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1977–1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kubo S, Hirohashi K, Tanaka H, et al. Effect of viral status on recurrence after liver resection for patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1016–1024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81760497).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuemei Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Yu, X., Liu, P. et al. Efficacy of Nucleoside Analogs for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Treatment: A Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 63, 3207–3219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5252-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5252-8

Keywords

Navigation