Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 11, pp 3285–3291 | Cite as

Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis by Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy (ERAT): Combination of Colonoscopy and Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicography

  • Yingchao Li
  • Chen Mi
  • Weizhi Li
  • Junjun She
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency, but the diagnosis of appendicitis remains a challenge. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is a new and minimally invasive procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Aim

To investigate the diagnostic value of ERAT for acute appendicitis by the combination of colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde appendicography (ERA).

Methods

Twenty-one patients with the diagnosis of suspected uncomplicated acute appendicitis who underwent ERAT between November 2014 and January 2015 were included in this study. The main outcomes, imaging findings of acute appendicitis including colonoscopic direct-vision imaging and fluoroscopic ERA imaging, were retrospectively reviewed. Secondary outcomes included mean operative time, mean hospital stay, rate of complication, rate of appendectomy during follow-up period, and other clinical data.

Results

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was established in 20 patients by positive ERA (5 patients) or colonoscopy (1 patient) alone or both (14 patients). The main colonoscopic imaging findings included mucosal inflammation (15/20, 75 %), appendicoliths (14/20, 70 %), and maturation (5/20, 25 %). The key points of ERA for diagnosing acute appendicitis included radiographic changes of appendix (17/20, 85 %), intraluminal appendicoliths (14/20, 70 %), and perforation (1/20, 5 %). Mean operative time of ERAT was 49.7 min, and mean hospital stay was 3.3 days. No patient converted to emergency appendectomy. Perforation occurred in one patient after appendicoliths removal was not severe and did not require invasive procedures. During at least 1-year follow-up period, only one patient underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.

Conclusion

ERAT is a valuable procedure of choice providing a precise yield of diagnostic information for patients with suspected acute appendicitis by combination of colonoscopy and ERA.

Keywords

Acute appendicitis Endoscopic retrograde appendicography Diagnosis Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy Endoscopic therapy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, et al. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA. 2001;286:1748–1753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA, et al. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg. 1997;21:313–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:557–564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, et al. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology. 2006;241:83–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saucier A, Huang EY, Emeremni CA, et al. Prospective evaluation of a clinical pathway for suspected appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e88–e95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bachur RG, Callahan MJ, Monuteaux MC, et al. Integration of ultrasound findings and a clinical score in the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1134–1139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaremko JL, Crockett A, Rucker D, et al. Incidence and significance of inconclusive results in ultrasound for appendicitis in children and teenagers. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2011;62:197–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mittal MK, Dayan PS, Macias CG, et al. Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children in a multicenter cohort. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20:697–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross MJ, Liu H, Netherton SJ, et al. Outcomes of children with suspected appendicitis and incompletely visualized appendix on ultrasound. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:538–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, et al. Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15:859–871.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu BR, Song JT, Han FY, et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a pilot minimally invasive technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:862–866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu BR, Ma X, Feng J, et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT): a multicenter retrospective study in China. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:905–909.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petroianu A. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2012;10:115–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whitley S, Sookur P, McLean A, et al. The appendix on CT. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:190–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations