Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 8, pp 2242–2251 | Cite as

Co-lyophilized Aspirin with Trehalose Causes Less Injury to Human Gastric Cells and Gastric Mucosa of Rats

  • Lee-Shuan Lin
  • Yuko Kayasuga-Kariya
  • Shugo Nakamura
  • Nobuyuki Shimohata
  • Takamasa Sakai
  • Ayano Fujisawa
  • Yuki Akagi
  • Shigeki Suzuki
  • Ung-il Chung
  • Nobuo Sasaki
  • Manabu Mochizuki
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Aspirin is one of the most popular NSAIDs worldwide because of its anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant effects, and however, gastrointestinal injury remains a major complication. We previously reported co-lyophilized aspirin/trehalose (Lyo A/T) decreased the aspirin-induced gastric lesions in dogs.

Aim

This study investigated the mechanism of gastroprotective effects of trehalose in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

The apoptotic assays were performed in a human gastric carcinoma cell line, which was treated with aspirin, mixed aspirin/trehalose (Mix A/T) or Lyo A/T. Gastric ulcer severity was examined after oral administration of drugs in rats. In addition, the mucosal tissue apoptotic status in drug-treated rats was evaluated. Molecular dynamics simulations and laser Raman spectroscopy were performed in order to examine the molecular properties of Lyo A/T.

Results

DNA fragmentation was detected in AGS cells that were treated with aspirin and Mix A/T, but not in the Lyo A/T-treated cells. There were fewer apoptotic cells in the Lyo A/T-treated cells than in the other cells. Gastric injury was reduced in rats that received oral Lyo A/T compared with the others, while PGE2 synthesis was equally decreased in all groups. TUNEL assay and immunohistochemistry of cleaved caspase-3 in the mucosal tissues also revealed that Lyo A/T treatment induced less apoptosis than the others. The Lyo A/T spectrum showed clear differences in several Raman bands compared with that of Mix A/T.

Conclusions

Our data showed that co-lyophilization of aspirin with trehalose reduced gastric injury, potentially through suppression of aspirin-induced mucosal cell apoptosis while retaining its anti-inflammatory effects.

Keywords

Aspirin Trehalose Lyophilization Gastroprotection Apoptosis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Tohru Kanke for his technical assistance. The present work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 21650105 and 25750156 and by the Platform Project for Supporting in Drug Discovery and Life Science Research from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    John DJ. Gastric mucosal damage by aspirin. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol. 1975;3:317–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin-like drugs. Nat New Biol. 1971;231:232–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wallace JL, Keenan CM, Granger DN. Gastric ulceration induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is a neutrophil-dependent process. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:G462–G467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoshida N, Yoshikawa T, Nakamura Y, et al. Role of neutrophil-mediated inflammation in aspirin-induced gastric mucosal injury. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:2300–2304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitahora T, Guth PH. Effect of aspirin plus hydrochloric acid on the gastric mucosal microcirculation. Gastroenterology. 1987;93:810–817.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tanaka K, Tomisato W, Hoshino T, et al. Involvement of intracellular Ca2+ levels in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:31059–31067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomisato W, Tsutsumi S, Hoshino T, et al. Role of direct cytotoxic effects of NSAIDs in the induction of gastric lesions. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;67:575–585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiorucci S, Antonelli E, Santucci L, et al. Gastrointestinal safety of nitric oxide-derived aspirin is related to inhibition of ICE-like cysteine proteases in rats. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1089–1106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiorucci S, Santucci L, Antonelli E, et al. NO-aspirin protects from T cell-mediated liver injury by inhibiting caspase-dependent processing of Th1-like cytokines. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:404–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fiorucci S. NO-releasing NSAIDs are caspase inhibitors. Trends Immunol. 2001;22:232–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lane ME, Kim MJ. Assessment and prevention of gastrointestinal toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2006;58:1295–1304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lim YJ, Lee JS, Ku YS, Hahm KB. Rescue strategies against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal damage. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1169–1178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birch GG. Trehaloses. Adv Carbohydr Chem. 1963;18:201–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wyatt GR, Kale GF. The chemistry of insect hemolymph. II. Trehalose and other carbohydrates. J Gen Physiol. 1957;40:833–847.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elbein AD. The metabolism of alpha, alpha-trehalose. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1974;30:227–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benaroudj N, Lee DH, Goldberg AL. Trehalose accumulation during cellular stress protects cells and cellular proteins from damage by oxygen radicals. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:24261–24267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen Q, Haddad GG. Role of trehalose phosphate synthase and trehalose during hypoxia: from flies to mammals. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:3125–3129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Echigo R, Shimohata N, Karatsu K, et al. Trehalose treatment suppresses inflammation, oxidative stress, and vasospasm induced by experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Transl Med. 2012;10:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taya K, Hirose K, Hamada S. Trehalose inhibits inflammatory cytokine production by protecting IkappaB-alpha reduction in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54:749–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minutoli L, Altavilla D, Bitto A, et al. The disaccharide trehalose inhibits proinflammatory phenotype activation in macrophages and prevents mortality in experimental septic shock. Shock. 2007;27:91–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sasnoor LM, Kale VP, Limaye LS. Prevention of apoptosis as a possible mechanism behind improved cryoprotection of hematopoietic cells by catalase and trehalose. Transplantation. 2005;80:1251–1260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen W, Zhang X, Liu M, et al. Trehalose protects against ocular surface disorders in experimental murine dry eye through suppression of apoptosis. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89:311–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mori Y, Yano F, Shimohata N, Suzuki S, Chung UI, Takato T. Trehalose inhibits oral dryness by protecting the cell membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:916–921.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fujino H, Lee S, Suzuki S, et al. Trehalose may prevent postsurgical adhesions in a rabbit model of hysterotomy. J Vet Med Sci. 2011;73:931–935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin LS, Kayasuga Y, Shimohata N, et al. Lyophilized aspirin with trehalose may decrease the incidence of gastric injuries in healthy dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74:1511–1516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kayasuga-Kariya Y, Iwanaga S, Fujisawa A, et al. Dermal cell damage induced by topical application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is suppressed by trehalose co-lyophilization in ex vivo analysis. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:1619–1622.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2008;4:435–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirschner KN, Yongye AB, Tschampel SM, et al. GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. Carbohydrates. J Comput Chem. 2008;29:622–655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang J, Wang W, Kollman PA, Case DA. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J Mol Graph Model. 2006;25:247–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lerbret A, Bordat P, Affouard F, Descamps M, Migliardo F. How homogeneous are the trehalose, maltose, and sucrose water solutions? An insight from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:11046–11057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sapir L, Harries D. Linking trehalose self-association with binary aqueous solution equation of state. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:624–634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall AJ, Tripp M, Howell T, Darland G, Bland JS, Babish JG. Gastric mucosal cell model for estimating relative gastrointestinal toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2006;75:9–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Burgoyne LA, Hewish DR, Mobbs J. Mammalian chromatin substructure studies with the calcium-magnesium endonuclease and two-dimensional polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis. Biochem J. 1974;143:67–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oberhammer F, Wilson JW, Dive C, et al. Apoptotic death in epithelial cells: cleavage of DNA to 300 and/or 50 kb fragments prior to or in the absence of internucleosomal fragmentation. EMBO J. 1993;12:3679–3684.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Power JJ, Dennis MS, Redlak MJ, Miller TA. Aspirin-induced mucosal cell death in human gastric cells: evidence supporting an apoptotic mechanism. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:1518–1525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Archana M, Bastian YT, et al. Various methods available for detection of apoptotic cells—a review. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50:274–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hernández C, Barrachina MD, Vallecillo-Hernández J, et al. Aspirin-induced gastrointestinal damage is associated with an inhibition of epithelial cell autophagy. J Gastroenterol. 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00535-015-1137-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sarkar S, Davies JE, Huang A, et al. Trehalose, a novel mTOR-independent autophagy enhancer, accelerates the clearance of mutant huntingtin and & α-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5641–5652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taylor LS, Zografi G. Sugar-polymer hydrogen bond interactions in lyophilized amorphous mixtures. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87:1615–1621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Davenport HW. Salicylate damage to the gastric mucosal barrier. N Engl J Med. 1967;276:1307–1312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Matsui H, Shimokawa O, Kaneko T, et al. The pathophysiology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced mucosal injuries in stomach and small intestine. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2011;48:107–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee-Shuan Lin
    • 1
  • Yuko Kayasuga-Kariya
    • 2
  • Shugo Nakamura
    • 3
  • Nobuyuki Shimohata
    • 4
  • Takamasa Sakai
    • 2
  • Ayano Fujisawa
    • 2
  • Yuki Akagi
    • 2
  • Shigeki Suzuki
    • 5
  • Ung-il Chung
    • 2
  • Nobuo Sasaki
    • 6
  • Manabu Mochizuki
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary MedicineNational Pingtung University of Science and TechnologyNeipuTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of EngineeringThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life SciencesRitsumeikan UniversityKusatsuJapan
  5. 5.NEXT21 K.K.TokyoJapan
  6. 6.Department of Veterinary Medical Science, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations