Abstract
Research is facing declining funding rates everywhere, affecting the cultural and economic growth of some of major world powers. We looked at the choices on funding allocation made by the USA and by Europe, to compare priorities and analyze consequences. Also, within Europe, we focused on Italy and on its consistent brain-drain phenomenon, as an example of short-sighted research policies that appear to require not only the urgent infusion of monetary resources and the creation of new job opportunities, but also and especially a general change of cultural approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Source: Eurostat 2011.
Source: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT), Italian National Institute of Statistics.
Marino IR. Acceptance of peer review will free Italy’s research slaves, Nature, 453, 449, 22 May 2008.
Abbreviations
- APRE:
-
Agency for the Promotion of Research in Europe
- CNR:
-
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
- CNRS:
-
Comitè National de la Recherche Scientifique
- ENEA:
-
Energia Nucleare ed Energie Alternative
- EU:
-
European Union
- EUR:
-
Euro
- FDA:
-
Food and Drug Administration
- 7FP:
-
7th Framework Program of the European Commission
- GDP:
-
Gross Domestic Product
- H2020:
-
Horizon 2020
- NIH:
-
National Institutes of Health
- OECD:
-
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
- R&D:
-
Research and Development
- US:
-
United States
- USD:
-
US Dollar
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marino, I.R., Cirillo, C. The State of Research in Europe and in Italy: The Risks of Short-Sighted Decisions. Dig Dis Sci 59, 2036–2039 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3303-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3303-3