Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 11, pp 2623–2634 | Cite as

Black Bile of Melancholy or Gallstones of Biliary Colics: Historical Perspectives on Cholelithiasis

  • Klaus Bielefeldt
Review

Abstract

Barely 130 years after its first description, cholecystectomies are among the most commonly performed surgeries in the USA. The success of this operation with subsequent technical improvements, such as laparoscopic approaches, caused a paradigm shift in the management of gallstone disease. However, symptoms persist in 10–40 % of successfully operated patients. Reviewing monographs, textbooks, and articles published during the last 300 years, several important factors emerge as likely contributors to limited or poor treatment responses. Early on, clinicians recognized that cholelithiasis is quite common and thus often an incidental finding, especially if patients present with vague or atypical symptoms. Consistent with these observations, patients with such atypical symptoms are less likely to benefit from cholecystectomy. Similarly, lasting improvements are more reliably seen in patients with symptoms of presumed biliary origin and documented gallstones compared to individuals without stones, an important point in view of increasing rates of surgery for biliary dyskinesia. While cholelithiasis can cause serious complications, the overall incidence of clinically relevant problems is so low that prophylactic cholecystectomy cannot be justified. This conclusion corresponds to epidemiologic data showing that the rise in elective cholecystectomies decreased hospitalizations due to gallstone disease, but was associated with a higher volume of postoperative complications, ultimately resulting in stable combined mortality due to gallstone disease and its treatment. These trends highlight the tremendous gains in managing gallstone disease, while at the same time reminding us that the tightening rather than expanding indications for cholecystectomy may improve outcomes.

Keywords

Cholecystectomy History of medicine Gallstone prevalence Outcomes 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Hippocrates. The Corpus. New York: Kaplan Publishing; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson I. Galen: on diseases and symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alpinus P. The presages of life and death in diseases. London: G. Strahan and J Clarke; 1746.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frerichs F. A clinical treatise on diseases of the liver. London: The New Sydenham Society; 1861.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langenbuch C. Ein Fall von Extirpation der Gallenblase wegen chronischer Cholelithiasis Heilung. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift. 1882;19:725–727.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thistle JL, Longstreth GF, Romero Y, et al. Factors that predict relief from upper abdominal pain after cholecystectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:891–896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srinath A, Youk A, Bielefeldt K. Biliary dyskinesia and symptomatic gallstone disease in children: Two sides of the same coin? Dig Dis Sci. 2014:1–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bielefeldt K. The rising tide of cholecystectomies for biliary dyskinesia. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37:98–106.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coe T. A treatise of biliary concretions: or, stones in the gall-bladder and ducts. London: D. Wilson and T. Durham; 1757.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ophüls W. Cholelithiasis with a short review of one hundred necropsies. Cal State J Med. 1913;11:310–313.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charcot J. Leçon sur les maladies due Foie, des voies biliaires et des Reins. Paris: Bourneville et Sevestre; 1877.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moynihan B. Gall-stones and their surgical treatment. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders and Company; 1904.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naunyn B. A treatise on cholelithiasis. London: The New Sydenham Society; 1896.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Case J. The value of the X-ray examination in cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1917;66:69–71.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boardman W, McKenzie R. Cholecystography—its value as a diagnostic procedure. Cal West Med. 1926;24:60–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mather J, Williams W. Cholecystography. The results of 125 consecutive cases examined by the oral administration of the salt. Br Med J. 1927;3456:614–615.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cholecystography Hardman T. An analysis of 137 cases showing the reliability of the oral method. Br Med J. 1929;3557:437–438.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Pancorbo CMn, Carballo F, Horcajo P, et al. Prevalence and associated factors for gallstone disease: results of a population survey in Spain. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1347–1355.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reshetnikov OV, Ryabikov AN, Shakhmatov SG, Malyutina SK. Gallstone disease prevalence in Western Siberia: cross-sectional ultrasound study versus autopsy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:702–707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walcher T, Haenle M, Kron M, et al. Pregnancy is not a risk factor for gallstone disease: results of a randomly selected population sample. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:6800–6806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brasca A, Pezzotto S, Berli D, et al. Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Argentina. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:2392–2398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Caroli-Bosc F-X, Deveau C, Harris A, et al. Prevalence of cholelithiasis (Results of an Epidemiologic Investigation in Vidauban, Southeast France). Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:1322–1329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heaton K, Braddon F, Mountford R, Hughes A, Emmett P. Symptomatic and silent gall stones in the community. Gut. 1991;32:316–320.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jørgensen T. Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:912–921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loria P, Dilengite M, Bozzoli M, et al. Prevalence rates of gallstone disease in Italy. The Chianciano population study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10:143–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Festi D, Dormi A, Capodicasa S, et al. Incidence of gallstone disease in Italy: results from a multicenter, population-based Italian study (the MICOL project). World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:5282–5289.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Statement NCDC, editor. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (http://consensus.nih.gov/1992/1992gallstoneslaparoscopy090html.htm). 1992.
  28. 28.
    Osler W. The principles and practice of medicine. New York: D. Appleton and Company; 1892.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aaron C. Diseases of the digestive organs. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febinger; 1921.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tweedie A. Practical medicine, vol. IV. London: Whittaker and Company; 1840.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Christian H. The oxford medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1920.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bishop E. An Address ON CHOLELITHIASIS: delivered before the Stockport Medical Society, January 10th, 1907. Br Med J. 1907;2412:676–680.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ryerson E. The aetiology of cholelithiasis, with a special reference to the age-incidence. Can Med Assoc J. 1911;1:832–841.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bain W. An experimental contribution to the treatment of cholelithiasis. Br Med J. 1905;2327:269–272.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Panpimanmas S, Manmee C. Risk factors for gallstone disease in a Thai population. J Epidemiol. 2009;19:116–121.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Attili A, Scafato E, Marchioli R, Marfisi R, Festi D. Diet and gallstones in Italy: the cross-sectional MICOL results. Hepatology. 1998;27:1492–1498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Misciagna G, Leoci C, Guerra V, et al. Epidemiology of cholelithiasis in southern Italy. Part II: risk factors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;8:585–593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Misciagna G, Centonze S, Leoci C, et al. Diet, physical activity, and gallstones—a population-based, case-control study in southern Italy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:120–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leitzmann M, Giovannucci E, Rimm E, et al. The relation of physical activity to risk for symptomatic gallstone disease in men. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:417–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Rimm EB, et al. A prospective study of coffee consumption and the risk of symptomatic gallstone disease in men. JAMA. 1999;281:2106–2112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Angelico F, Del Ben M, Barbato A, Conti R, Urbinati G. Ten-year incidence and natural history of gallstone disease in a rural population of women in central Italy. The Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;29:249–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Maringhini A, Ciambra M, Baccelliere P, et al. Biliary sludge and gallstones in pregnancy: incidence, risk factors, and natural history. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:116–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Braverman DZ, Johnson ML, Kern F. Effects of pregnancy and contraceptive steroids on gallbladder function. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:362–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Scragg R, McMichael A, Seamark R. Oral contraceptives, pregnancy, and endogenous oestrogen in gall stone disease–a case-control study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;288:1795–1799.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ryan J, Pellecchia D. Effect of progesterone pretreatment on guinea pig gallbladder motility in vitro. Gastroenterology. 1982;83:81–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Glenn F, McSherry C. Pregnancy, cholesterol metabolism and gallstones. Ann Surg. 1969;169:712–723.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ko CW, Beresford SAA, Schulte SJ, Lee SP. Insulin resistance and incident gallbladder disease in pregnancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:76–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muhrbeck O. Symptoms of gallstone disease in a Swedish population. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;7:1209–1214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mertens MC, Roukema JA, Scholtes VP, De Vries J. Risk assessment in cholelithiasis: is cholecystectomy always to be preferred? J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1271–1279.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kelly A, Pepper W. Diseases of the liver, gall-bladder and biliary ducts. In Osler W, McCrae T (eds). Philadelphia, New York Lea & Febiger; 1914.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ko CW, Beresford SAA, Schulte SJ, Matsumoto AM, Lee SP. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors for biliary sludge and stones during pregnancy. Hepatology. 2005;41:359–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Friedman GD, Raviola CA, Fireman B. Prognosis of gallstones with mild or no symptoms: 25 years of follow-up in a health maintenance organization. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:127–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Attili A, De Santis A, Capri R, Repice A, Maselli S. The natural history of gallstones: the GREPCO experience. The GREPCO Group. Hepatology. 1995;21:655–660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cucchiaro G, Rossitch J, Bowie J, et al. Clinical significance of ultrasonographically detected coincidental gallstones. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:417–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Festi D, Reggiani M, Attili A, et al. Natural history of gallstone disease: expectant management or active treatment? Results from a population-based cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:719–724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    McClure R. The post-operative complications of cholecystectomy. A study of 700 cholecystectomies. Ann Surg. 1929;90:253–260.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wilkie D, Illingworth C. Cholecystography: a report of fifty-three cases controlled by operation. Br Med J. 1925;3388:1046–1048.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bryan W. Correlation of Symptoms, Pathology and Results in Cholecystectomy. A Study of Two Hundred Thirty-Three Cholecystectomies Done in Vanderbilt School of Medicine from to the Middle of May, 1932. Ann Surg. 1925;1933:342–347.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sanders R. The end results in five hundred cases of cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1930;92:376–387.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Araki T. Cholecystitis: a comparison of real-time ultrasonography and technetium-99 m hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Clin Radiol. 1980;31:675–679.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cooperberg P, Burhenne H. Real-time ultrasonography. Diagnostic technique of choice in calculous gallbladder disease. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:1277–1279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Prian G, Norton L, Eule JJ, Eiseman B. Clinical indications and accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography in the patient with suspected biliary tract disease. Am J Surg. 1977;134:705–711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cooper A, Young H. Pathophysiology and treatment of gallstones. Med Clin North Am. 1989;73:753–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pemberton C. A practical treatise on various diseases of the abdominal viscera. Worcester: A Trumbull; 1815.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bouchier I. Gall stone dissolving agents. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;286:778–780.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Soehendra N, Schulz H, Nam V, et al. ESWL and gallstone dissolution with MTBE via a naso-vesicular catheter. Endoscopy. 1990;22:176–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Uchida N, Nakatsu T, Hirabayashi S, et al. Direct dissolution of gallstones with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) via endoscopic transpapillary catheterization in the gallbladder (ETCG). J Gastroenterol. 1994;29:486–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Peine C, Petersen B, Williams H, et al. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and methyl tert-butyl ether for partially calcified gallstones. Gastroenterology. 1989;97:1229–1235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vergunst H, Terpstra O, Brakel K, Laméris J, van Blankenstein M, Schröder F. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones. Possibilities and limitations. Ann Surg. 1989;210:565–575.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Edison S, Maier M, Kohler B, et al. Direct dissolution of gallstones with methyl tert-butyl ether by endoscopic cannulation of the gallbladder. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1242–1248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Holl J, Sauerbruch T, Sackmann M, Pauletzki J, Paumgartner G. Combined treatment of symptomatic gallbladder stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and instillation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE). Dig Dis Sci. 1991;36:1097–1101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rambow A, Staritz M, Grosse A, Meyer zum Büschenfelde K. Electromagnetically generated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and adjuvant combined oral litholysis for therapy of symptomatic gallbladder stones. Digestion. 1991;48:220–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Vellar I, Desmond P, Pritchard C, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy combined with litholytic therapy in the treatment of patients with symptomatic gallstones–the Melbourne experience. Med J Aust. 1993;158:94–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Meiser G, Heinerman M, Lexer G, Boeckl O. Aggressive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gall bladder stones within wider treatment criteria: fragmentation rate and early results. Gut. 1992;33:277–281.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    den Toom R, Vergunst H, Nijs H, Brakel K, Laméris J, Terpstra O. Electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones: a wide range of inclusion criteria. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:498–503.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Soehendra N, Nam V, Binmoeller K, Koch H, Bohnacker S, Schreiber H. Pulverisation of calcified and non-calcified gall bladder stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy used alone. Gut. 1994;35:417–422.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pauletzki J, Holl J, Sackmann M, et al. Gallstone recurrence after direct contact dissolution with methyl tert-butyl ether. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:1775–1781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Elewaut A, Crape A, Afschrift M. Results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones in 693 patients: a plea for restriction to solitary radiolucent stones. Gut. 1993;34:274–278.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Traverso LW. Carl Langenbuch and the first cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1976;132:81–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Brayton A. Dr. John S. Bobbs of Indianapolis 1809–1970: The father of cholecystotomy. Indianapolis Indiana Med J; 1905.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kocher T. Text-book of operative surgery. 2nd ed. London: Adam and Charles Black; 1903.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Whipple A. Surgical criteria for cholecystectomy. Bull NY Acad Med. 1926;2:302–306.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cave H. Dangers incident to cholecystectomy. An analysis of 575 cases of cholecystectomy and cholecystostomy. Ann Surg. 1926;84:371–378.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Heyd C. Cholelithiasis; cholecystectomy; appendectomy. Surg Clin N Am. 1921;1:533–545.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    O’Conor J. The surgical treatment of cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy and choledochotomy: continuous out-door treatment. Ann Surg. 1922;76:201–204.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Krukenberg H. Über Gallenkoliken ohne Gallensteine”. Berliner Klin Wochenschrift. 1903;XI:660.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Berg A. Surgical treatment of cholelithiasis: a report of the operations for cholelithiasis, in the Service of Dr. A. G. Gerster, at Mount Sinai Hospital, during the five years, 1898–1902. Ann Surg. 1903;38:343–358.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Urbach D, Stukel T. Rate of elective cholecystectomy and the incidence of severe gallstone disease. CMAJ. 2005;172:1015–1019.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Persson G, Ros A, Thulin A. Surgical treatment of gallstones: changes in a defined population during a 20-year period. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:13–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Steiner C, Bass E, Talamini M, Pitt H, Steinberg E. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:403–408.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Strasberg S, Clavien P. Overview of therapeutic modalities for the treatment of gallstone diseases. Am J Surg. 1993;165:420–426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Legorreta A, Silber J, Costantino G, Kobylinski R, Zatz S. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993;270:1429–1432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cohen MM, Young W, Theriault ME, Hernandez R. Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario? Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154:491–500.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Steinle E, VanderMolen R, Silbergleit A, Cohen M. Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on indications for surgical treatment of gallstones. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:933–935.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Brescia A, Gasparrini M, Nigri G, Cosenza UM, Dall’Oglio A, Pancaldi A, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day surgery: Feasibility and outcomes of the first 400 patients. The Surgeon. 2013;11, Supplement 1(0):S14–S8.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Kullman E, Dahlin L, Hallhagen S, Segersvärdh R, Borch K. Trends in incidence, clinical findings and outcome of acute and elective cholecystectomy, 1970–1986. Eur J Surg. 1994;160:605–611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Brunt L, Quasebarth M, Dunnegan D, Soper N. Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:700–705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Massarweh N, Legner V, Symons R, McCormick W, Flum D. Impact of advancing age on abdominal surgical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2009;144:1108–1114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Tucker J, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg. 2011;77:1014–1020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V. Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg. 2013;79:553–560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Dua A, Aziz A, Desai S, McMaster J, Kuy S. National trends in the adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 7 years in the United States and impact of laparoscopic approaches stratified by age. Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:635461.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Plecka Östlund M, Wenger U, Mattsson F, Ebrahim F, Botha A, Lagergren J. Population-based study of the need for cholecystectomy after obesity surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:864–869.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Khan ZS, Livingston EH, Huerta S. Reassessing the need for prophylactic surgery in patients with porcelain gallbladder: case series and systematic review of the literature. Arch Surg. 2011;146:1143–1147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Del Favero G, Caroli A, Meggiato T, et al. Natural history of gallstones in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A prospective 5-year follow-up. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39:1704–1707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Le M, Henson D, Young H, Albores-Saavedra J. Is gallbladder cancer decreasing in view of increasing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Ann Hepatol. 2011;10:306–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Godrey P, Bates T, Harrison M, King M, Padley N. Gall stones and mortality: a study of all gall stone related deaths in a single health district. Gut. 1984;25:1029–1033.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Eliason EN, North JP. Morbidity following cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1939;109:580–587.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Desautels S, Slivka A, Hutson W, et al. Postcholecystectomy pain syndrome: pathophysiology of abdominal pain in sphincter of Oddi type III. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:900–905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Jagannath SB, Singh VK, Cruz-Correa M, Canto MIF, Kalloo AN. A long-term cohort study of outcome after cholecystectomy for chronic acalculous cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 2003;185:91–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Macaron C, Qadeer M, Vargo JJ. Recurrent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78:171–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Taube H. Unsuccessful cholecystectomies—the “post-cholecystectomy’ syndrome. Can Med Assoc J. 1964;91:564–565.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Mertens MC, Vries J, Scholtes VPW, Jansen P, Roukema JA. Prospective 6 weeks follow-up post-cholecystectomy: the predictive value of pre-operative symptoms. J Gastroint Surg. 2009;13:304–311.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Corazziari E, Attili AF, Angeletti C, De Santis A. Gallstones, cholecystectomy and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): MICOL population-based study. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:944–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Parkman H, Yates K, Hasler W, et al. Cholecystectomy and clinical presentations of gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1062–1073.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Mertens MC, Roukema JA, Scholtes VPW, De Vries J. Trait anxiety predicts unsuccessful surgery in gallstone disease. Psychosom Med. 2010;72:198–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Brawman-Mintzer O, Durkalski V, Wu Q, et al. Psychosocial characteristics and pain burden of patients with suspected sphincter of oddi dysfunction in the EPISOD multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:436–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Parsons W. The immediate and end-results of cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1940;111:831–837.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Colp R. The postcholecystectomy syndrome and its treatment. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1944;20:203–219.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Ponsky T, DeSagun R, Brody F. Surgical therapy for biliary dyskinesia: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005;15:439–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Berger MY, olde Hartman TC, van der Velden JJIM, Bohnen AM. Is biliary pain exclusively related to gallbladder stones? A controlled prospective study. Br J General Pract. 2004;54:574–579.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Aggarwal N, Bielefeldt K. Diagnostic stringency and healthcare needs in patients with biliary dyskinesia. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2799–2808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Bortolotti M, Caletti G, Brocchi E, et al. Endoscopic manometry in the diagnosis of the postcholecystectomy pain syndrome. Digestion. 1983;28:153–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Tanaka M, Ikeda S, Nakayama F. Change in bile duct pressure responses after cholecystectomy: loss of gallbladder as a pressure reservoir. Gastroenterology. 1984;87:1154–1159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Durkalski V, et al. Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:765–772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Jaunoo SS, Mohandas S, Almond LM. Postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). Int J Surg. 2010;8:15–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Alvarez FA, de Santibañes M, Palavecino M, et al. Impact of routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy on bile duct injury. Br J Surg. 2014;101:677–684.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Sheffield KM, Riall TS, Han Y, Kuo Y, Townsend CM Jr, et al. ASsociation between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury. JAMA. 2013;310:812–820.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Smith E. Biliary drainage in operations on the gallbladder and biliary ducts. Am Med. 1905;9:688–691.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Robson A. On cholecystectomy: the indications and contraindications for its performance. Br Med J. 1907;2:1117–1118.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Malcolm J. Cases of cholecystectomy. Proc R Soc Med. 1908;1:93–106.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Briggs J. Surgery of the biliary tract. Boston Med Surg J. 1918;178:116–120.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Judd E. The recurrence of symptoms following operations on the biliary tract. Collected Papers of the Mayo Clinics. 1918;10:115–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations