Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 8, pp 1862–1869 | Cite as

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Squamous Esophageal Neoplasia: A Meta-Analysis

  • Joon Sung Kim
  • Byung-Wook Kim
  • In-Soo Shin
Original Article


Background and Aims

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has grown popular in resecting lesions in the stomach, the application of ESD to the esophagus has been limited by greater technical difficulty. An increasing number of series have recently reported the application of ESD to esophageal lesions. The aim of the present systemic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for esophageal lesions.


Comprehensive literature searches (1999–2012) were performed on studies that reported ESD for the removal of esophageal neoplasia. Primary outcome measures were pooled estimates of complete resection rate and en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcome measures were pooled estimates of complication rates.


A total of 15 studies provided data on 776 ESD-treated lesions. The pooled estimate of complete resection rate was 89.4 % (95 % CI 86.2–91.9 %). The pooled estimate of en bloc resection was 95.1 % (95 % CI 92.6–96.8 %). The pooled estimates of complications of ESD such as bleeding, perforation, and stenosis were 2.1, 5.0, and 11.6 %, respectively.


ESD appeared to be an extremely effective technique to achieve complete resection of esophageal neoplasia. The very low rate of complications also shows the potential safety of this approach.


Endoscopic submucosal dissection Esophageal neoplasia Meta-analysis 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Shimizu Y, Takahashi M, Yoshida T, et al. Endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: current status of various techniques. Dig Endosc.. 2013;25:13–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araki K, Ohno S, Egashira A, et al. Pathologic features of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node and distal metastasis. Cancer. 2002;94:570–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi JY, Park YS, Jung HY, et al. Feasibility of endoscopic resection in superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:881–889.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eguchi T, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, et al. Histopathological criteria for additional treatment after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal cancer: analysis of 464 surgically resected cases. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:475–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim DU, Lee JH, Min BH, et al. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:619–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Natsugoe S, Baba M, Yoshinaka H, et al. Mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases. Oncology.. 1998;55:235–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shimada H, Nabeya Y, Matsubara H, et al. Prediction of lymph node status in patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 160 surgically resected cancers. Am J Surg. 2006;191:250–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tajima Y, Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A, et al. Histopathologic findings predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 240 surgically resected tumors. Cancer. 2000;88:1285–1293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farhat S, Chaussade S, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development. Endoscopy.. 2011;43:664–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.. 2006;4:688–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N, et al. Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1066–1072.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ishii N, Uchida S, Itoh T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife for superficial esophageal neoplasia. Is it safe for elderly patients? Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2110–2119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kikuchi O, Mouri H, Matsueda K, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of patients aged 75 years and over with esophageal cancer. ISRN Gastroenterol.. 2012;2012:671324.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee CT, Chang CY, Tai CM, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal neoplasia: a single center experience in South Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2012;111:132–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mizuta H, Nishimori I, Kuratani Y, et al. Predictive factors for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:626–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nonaka K, Arai S, Ishikawa K, et al. Short term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection in superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. World J Gastrointest Endosc.. 2010;2:69–74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:860–866.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oyama T, Tomori A, Hotta K, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.. 2005;3:S67–S70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Repici A, Hassan C, Carlino A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a prospective Western series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:715–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tamiya Y, Nakahara K, Kominato K, et al. Pneumomediastinum is a frequent but minor complication during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy.. 2010;42:8–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Yu Ngo DK, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection in management of superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms outside Japan. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:e190–e194.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toyonaga T, Man IM, Fujita T, et al. The performance of a novel ball-tipped Flush knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a case-control study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:908–915.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Urabe Y, Hiyama T, Tanaka S, et al. Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy for superficial esophageal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:275–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamashina T, Ishihara R, Uedo N, et al. Safety and curative ability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancers at least 50 mm in diameter. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:220–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:255–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–e34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, et al. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2666–2677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula Pessoa D et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2012;44:137–150.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, et al. Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms. Endoscopy.. 2009;41:661–665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ezoe Y, Muto M, Horimatsu T, et al. Efficacy of preventive endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:222–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kochhar R, Makharia GK. Usefulness of intralesional triamcinolone in treatment of benign esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:829–834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saito Y, Tanaka T, Andoh A, et al. Novel biodegradable stents for benign esophageal strictures following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:330–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Nakayama T, et al. Usefulness of oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1115–1121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ciocirlan M, Lapalus MG, Hervieu V, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for squamous premalignant and early malignant lesions of the esophagus. Endoscopy.. 2007;39:24–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Yamana H, et al. Optimum treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer: endoscopic mucosal resection versus radical esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2001;25:424–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Katada C, Muto M, Momma K, et al. Clinical outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae—a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy.. 2007;39:779–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shimizu Y, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M, et al. Long-term outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae or deeper. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:387–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Esaki M, Matsumoto T, Hirakawa K, et al. Risk factors for local recurrence of superficial esophageal cancer after treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy.. 2007;39:41–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, et al. A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:763–770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hirasawa K, Kokawa A, Oka H, et al. Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: long-term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:960–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yamada M, Oda I, Nonaka S, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic resection of superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Endoscopy.. 2013;45:992–996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Blencowe NS, Strong S, McNair AG, et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255:658–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s HospitalThe Catholic University of KoreaInchonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.College of EducationJeonju UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations