Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 58, Issue 12, pp 3611–3619 | Cite as

The Safety and Efficacy of Therapeutic ERCP in the Pediatric Population Performed by Adult Gastroenterologists

  • Lauren Halvorson
  • Kevin Halsey
  • Peter Darwin
  • Eric Goldberg
Original Article



Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is much less commonly performed in the pediatric population compared to adults. As a result, few pediatric gastroenterologists receive adequate training in ERCP. At many institutions, pediatric ERCP is performed by adult gastroenterologists not formally trained in pediatric gastroenterology.


The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ERCP performed in pediatric patients by adult gastroenterologists in a single tertiary care center.


We performed a retrospective analysis of pooled endoscopic procedures in pediatric patients (age <18 years) at the University of Maryland Medical Center, between 2003 and 2011, by two adult therapeutic endoscopists. Neither endoscopist had formal training in pediatric ERCP prior to 2003. Outcome measures included the procedure indications, cannulation success rates, procedure success rates, type of anesthesia, therapeutic interventions, frequency and type of procedure related complications, and technical complexity.


Forty-five patients were included with a mean age of 12 years (range 6–17). There were a total of 70 ERCP procedures. Choledocholithiasis was the most common indication. Modes of anesthesia included monitored anesthesia care (31, 44.3 %), general anesthesia (22, 31.4 %) and moderate conscious sedation (17, 24.3 %). The papilla cannulation success rate was 98.6 % (69/70). Therapeutic maneuvers included 31 biliary sphincterotomies, ten pancreatic sphincterotomies, 17 pancreatic duct stents, 16 bile duct stents, two cystgastrostomy stents, four biliary stricture dilations, one minor papillotomy site dilation, one mechanical lithotripsy and one ampullectomy. The procedural success rate was 97.1 % (68/70). The overall complication rate was 7.1 % (5/70) with a post-ERCP pancreatitis rate of 4.3 % (3/70). Complications included infection (moderate-1), bleeding (moderate-1), and post-ERCP pancreatitis (mild-1, moderate-2).


ERCP procedures in pediatric patients can be safely and efficaciously performed by adult gastroenterologists trained in advanced endoscopy.


ERCP Safety Treatment efficacy Pediatrics Adult gastroenterologists 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1968;167:752–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hsu RK, Draganov P, Leung JW, et al. Therapeutic ERCP in the management of pancreatitis in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:396–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cotton PB, Laage NJ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57:131–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng CL, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: a large series report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:445–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guitron A, Adalid R, Barinagarrementeria R, et al. Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pediatric patients. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 1998;63:211–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prasil P, Laberge JM, Barkun A, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: a surgeon’s perspective. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:733–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dua K, Miranda A, Santharam R, Ramanujam S, Werlin S. ERCP in the evaluation of abdominal pain in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1081–1085.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durakbasa CU, Balik E, Yamaner S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children and adolescents: experience in a single institution. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18:241–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poddar U, Thapa BR, Bhasin DK, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of pancreaticobiliary disorders in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:927–931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paris C, Bejjani J, Beaunoyer M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is useful and safe in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:938–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Otto AK, Neal MD, Slivka AN, et al. An appraisal of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for pancreaticobiliary disease in children: our institutional experience in 231 cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2536–2540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, et al. Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:165–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cotton LB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M, et al. Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:628–636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut. 2007;56:821–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:80–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guelrud M, Mujica C, Jaen D, et al. The role of ERCP in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic and recurrent pancreatitis in children and adolescents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:428–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iqbal CW, Baron TH, Moir CR, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49:430–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arata S, Takada T, Hirata K, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:70–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Hawes RH, et al. Technical outcomes and complications of ERCP in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:367–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Halvorson
    • 1
  • Kevin Halsey
    • 2
  • Peter Darwin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Eric Goldberg
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, N3W42BaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Ferrell-Duncan ClinicSpringfieldUSA
  3. 3.University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations