Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Early Precut with Needle-Knife in Difficult Biliary Cannulation During ERCP

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is scarce information on whether performing the precut procedure early rather than after several cannulation attempts is associated with different success and complication rates.

Objective

The aim of this retrospective study was is to compare the early precut technique with the standard one in terms of the results and complications.

Methods

The contemporary success rate and postoperative complications in 792 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases were frequently observed during the period from June 2007 to May 2011, and 56 of these cases were carried out with precut biliary sphincterotomy after the standard sphincterotomy had failed.

Results

The success rate for standard sphincterotomy was 89.8 %: 51 out of 56 cases were carried out with precut biliary sphincterotomy and succeeded. The total success rate was 96.3 %. The difference was significant (χ 2 = 25.62, p < 0.01) compared to the success rate of first cannulation, while the difference in complication rates between precut and standard sphincterotomy was minor (9.9 vs. 12.5 %, p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Early precut with a needle-knife in a difficult biliary cannulation was safe and effective if performed by experienced endoscopists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Abraham NS, Barkun AN. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(6):775–779.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Larkin CJ, Kees H. Precut sphincterotomy: indications, pitfalls, and complications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001;3(2):147–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maydeo A, Borkar D. Techniques of selective cannulation and sphincterotomy. Endoscopy. 2003;35(8):S19–S23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahaleh M, Tokar J, Mullick T, Bickston SJ, Yeaton P. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic sphincterotomy as a precut technique for biliary cannulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(11):971–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cotton P, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(3):383–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotton PB. Outcomes of endoscopy procedures: struggling towards definitions. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40(4):514–518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rollhauser C, Johnson M, Al-Kawas F. Needle-knife papillotomy: a helpful and safe adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a selected population. Endoscopy. 1998;30(8):691.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(13):909–919.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(5):652–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper ST, Slivka A. Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36(2):259–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruins SW, Schoeman M, Disario J, Wolters F, Tytgat G, Huibregtse K. Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications. Endoscopy. 1996;28(4):334–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasmin FE, Cohen D, Batra S, Cohen SA, Siegel JH. Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: efficacy and complications. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44(1):48–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolzan H, Spatola J, Gonzalez J, Luna R, Garcia G. Precut Vater’s papilla. Prospective evaluation of frequency of use, effectiveness, complication and mortality. Cooperative study in the northwest of the province of Buenos Aires. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2001;31(4):323–327.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burdick JS, London A, Thompson DR. Intramural incision technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(3):425–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Intramural incision technique: a useful and safe procedure for obtaining ductal access during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(4):629–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaffes AJ, Sriram PV, Rao GV, Santosh D, Reddy DN. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(5):669–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laohavichitra K, Akaraviputh T, Methasate A, Leelakusolvong S, Kachintorn U. Comparison of early pre-cutting vs. standard technique for biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a personal experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(27):3734.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-chang Chen.

Additional information

Jian-hong Zhu, Qiang Liu, De-qing Zhang and Huang Feng have contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, Jh., Liu, Q., Zhang, Dq. et al. Evaluation of Early Precut with Needle-Knife in Difficult Biliary Cannulation During ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 58, 3606–3610 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2834-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2834-3

Keywords

Navigation