Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 1287–1292 | Cite as

Image-Enhanced Endoscopy with I-scan Technology for the Evaluation of Duodenal Villous Patterns

  • Giovanni Cammarota
  • Gianluca Ianiro
  • Lucia Sparano
  • Rossella La Mura
  • Riccardo Ricci
  • Luigi M. Larocca
  • Raffaele Landolfi
  • Antonio Gasbarrini
Original Article

Abstract

Background

I-scan technology is the newly developed endoscopic tool that works in real time and utilizes a digital contrast method to enhance endoscopic image.

Aims

We performed a feasibility study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of i-scan technology for the evaluation of duodenal villous patterns, having histology as the reference standard.

Methods

In this prospective, single center, open study, patients undergoing upper endoscopy for an histological evaluation of duodenal mucosa were enrolled. All patients underwent upper endoscopy using high resolution view in association with i-scan technology. During endoscopy, duodenal villous patterns were evaluated and classified as normal, partial villous atrophy, or marked villous atrophy. Results were then compared with histology.

Results

One hundred fifteen subjects were recruited in this study. The endoscopist was able to find marked villous atrophy of the duodenum in 12 subjects, partial villous atrophy in 25, and normal villi in the remaining 78 individuals. The i-scan system was demonstrated to have great accuracy (100 %) in the detection of marked villous atrophy patterns. I-scan technology showed quite lower accuracy in determining partial villous atrophy or normal villous patterns (respectively, 90 % for both items).

Conclusions

Image-enhancing endoscopic technology allows a clear visualization of villous patterns in the duodenum. By switching from the standard to the i-scan view, it is possible to optimize the accuracy of endoscopy in recognizing villous alteration in subjects undergoing endoscopic evaluation.

Keywords

Celiac disease Duodenal villi Endoscopy Enhanced imaging I-scan technology 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Oxentenko AS, Grisolano SW, Murray JA, Burgart LJ, Dierkhising RA, Alexander JA. The insensitivity of endoscopic markers in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:933–938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brocchi E, Tomassetti P, Misitano B, et al. Endoscopic markers in adult coeliac disease. Digest Liver Dis. 2002;34:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hopper AD, Cross SS, Sanders DS. Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate? Endoscopy. 2008;40:219–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stevens FM, McCarthy CF. The endoscopic demonstration of celiac disease. Endoscopy. 1976;8:177–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corazza GR, Brocchi E, Caletti G, Gasbarrini G. Loss of duodenal folds allows diagnosis of unsuspected coeliac disease. Gut. 1990;31:1080–1081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McIntyre AS, Ng DP, Smith JA, Amoah J, Long RG. The endoscopic appearance of duodenal folds is predictive of untreated adult celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:148–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith AD, Graham I, Rose JD. A prospective endoscopic study of scalloped folds and grooves in the mucosa of the duodenum as signs of villous atrophy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:461–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maurino E, Capizzano H, Niveloni S, et al. Value of endoscopic markers in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:2028–2033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magazzu G, Bottari M, Tuccari G, et al. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy can be a reliable screening tool for celiac sprue in adults. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;19:255–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dickey W, Hughes D. Prevalence of celiac disease and its endoscopic markers among patients having routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2182–2186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maurino E, Bai JC. Endoscopic markers of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:760–761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravelli AM, Tobanelli P, Minelli L, Villanacci V, Cestari R. Endoscopic features of celiac disease in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:736–742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corazza GR, Caletti GC, Lazzari R, et al. Scalloped duodenal folds in childhood celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;29:543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lecleire S, Di Fiore F, Antonietti M, et al. Endoscopic markers of villous atrophy are not useful for the detection of celiac disease in patients with dyspeptic symptoms. Endoscopy. 2006;38:696–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bardella MT, Minoli G, Radaelli F, Quatrini M, Bianchi PA, Conte D. Reevaluation of duodenal endoscopic markers in the diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:714–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM, Gigliobianco A. Endoscopic features of celiac disease in adults and their correlation with age, histological damage, and clinical form of the disease. Endoscopy. 2002;34:787–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cammarota G, Fedeli P, Gasbarrini A. Emerging technologies in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and celiac disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:47–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh R, Nind G, Tucker G, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the evaluation of villous morphology: a feasibility study assessing a simplified classification and observer agreement. Endoscopy. 2010;42:889–894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kodashima S, Fujishiro M. Novel image-enhanced endoscopy with i-scan technology. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:1043–1049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cammarota G, Martino A, Pirozzi GA, et al. Direct visualization of intestinal villi by high-resolution magnifying upper endoscopy: a validation study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:732–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fedeli P, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G. Spectral endoscopic imaging: the multiband system for enhancing the endoscopic surface visualization. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:6–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of celiac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:1185–1194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1981–2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Siegel LM, Stevens PD, Lightdale CJ, et al. Combined magnification endoscopy with chromoendoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected malabsorption. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:226–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoffman A, Kagel C, Goetz M, et al. Recognition and characterization of small colonic neoplasia with high-definition colonoscopy using i-scan is as precise as chromoendoscopy. Dig Liv Dis. 2010;42:45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffman A, Basting N, Goetz M, et al. High-definition endoscopy with i-scan and Lugol’s solution for more precise detection of mucosal breaks in patients with reflux symptoms. Endoscopy. 2009;41:107–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:40–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ciaccio EJ, Bhagat G, Tennyson CA, Lewis SK, Hernandez L, Green PH. Quantitative assessment of endoscopic images for degree of villous atrophy in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:805–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ciaccio EJ, Tennyson CA, Bhagat G, Lewis SK, Green PH. Quantitative estimates of motility from videocapsule endoscopy are useful to discern celiac patients from controls. Dig Dis Sci. 57:2936–2943.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cammarota G, Cesaro P, Cazzato A, et al. The water immersion technique is easy to learn for routine use during EGD for duodenal villous evaluation: a single-center 2-year experience. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:244–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Cammarota
    • 1
    • 4
  • Gianluca Ianiro
    • 1
  • Lucia Sparano
    • 1
  • Rossella La Mura
    • 1
  • Riccardo Ricci
    • 2
  • Luigi M. Larocca
    • 2
  • Raffaele Landolfi
    • 3
  • Antonio Gasbarrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy UnitCatholic University of Medicine and SurgeryRomeItaly
  2. 2.Institute of HistopathologyCatholic University of Medicine and SurgeryRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineCatholic University of Medicine and SurgeryRomeItaly
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineA. Gemelli University HospitalRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations