Skip to main content
Log in

Association Between Swallow Perception and Esophageal Bolus Clearance in Patients with Globus Sensation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Globus sensation is common, but its pathogenesis is not yet clear.

Aims

Our purpose was to investigate subjective perception of swallowing and esophageal motility by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry (MII-EM) for patients with globus sensation.

Methods

Combined MII-EM was performed for 25 globus patients and 15 healthy controls. Swallows were abnormal if hypocontractivity or simultaneous contractions occurred. Esophageal bolus transit was incomplete if bolus exit was not found at one or more of all measurement sites. Perception of each swallow was assessed by use of a standardized scoring system, and was enhanced if the score was >1.

Results

Few globus patients reported enhanced perception during viscous or solid swallows. Incomplete bolus transit and enhanced perception occurred similarly between viscous and solid boluses. Agreement between enhanced perception and proximal bolus clearance was greater during solid swallows (κ = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.32–0.58) than during viscous swallows (κ = 0.13, 95 % CI: 0–0.25) (P < 0.05). Similarly, agreement between enhanced perception and total bolus clearance was greater during solid swallows (κ = 0.46, 95 % CI: 0.34–0.58) than during viscous swallows (κ = 0.11, 95 % CI: 0–0.22) (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Enhanced swallow perception is uncommon in patients with globus sensation, although there is a significant association between enhanced esophageal perception and solid bolus clearance. Application of a solid bolus may help better delineation of the interrelationship between the subjective perception of bolus passage and the objective measurement of bolus clearance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moloy PJ, Charter R. The globus symptom. Incidence, therapeutic response, and age and sex relationships. Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108:740–744.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Watson WC, Sullivan SN. Hypertonicity of the cricopharyngeal sphincter: a cause of globus sensation. Lancet. 1974;2:1417–1419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson JA, Pryde A, Piris J, et al. Pharyngoesophageal dysmotility in globus sensation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115:1086–1090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Batch AJ. Globus pharyngeus (Part I). J Laryngol Otol. 1988;102:152–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris MB, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. Life events and difficulties in relation to the onset of globus pharyngis. J Psychosom Res. 1996;40:603–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson JA, Deary IJ, Maran AG. The persistence of symptoms in patients with globus pharyngis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1991;16:202–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Silny J. Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for measurement of gastrointestinal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1991;3:151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simren M, Silny J, Holloway R, Tack J, Janssens J, Sifrim D. Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance. Gut. 2003;52:784–790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CL, Yi CH. Clinical correlates of dysphagia to oesophageal dysmotility: studies using combined manometry and impedance. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:611–617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, et al. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:174–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001;49:145–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen CL, Yi CH. Assessment of esophageal motor function using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry in healthy volunteers: a single-center study in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1039–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:423–429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin HM, Williamson JM, Lipsitz SR. Calculating power for the comparison of dependent κ-coefficients. Appl Stat. 2003;52:391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farkkila MA, Ertama L, Katila H, Kuusi K, Paavolainen M, Varis K. Globus pharyngis, commonly associated with esophageal motility disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:503–508.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson JA, Hawkins RA, Sangster K, et al. Estimation of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in chronic rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1986;11:213–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adachi J, Ohmae Y, Karaho T, et al. Relationship between globus sensation and esophageal clearance. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130:138–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen CL, Szczesniak MM, Cook IJ. Evidence for oesophageal visceral hypersensitivity and aberrant symptom referral in patients with globus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:e1142–e1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Allen ML, Orr WC, Mellow MH, Robinson MG. Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:831–833.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anand P, Aziz Q, Willert R, van Oudenhove L. Peripheral and central mechanisms of visceral sensitization in man. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007;19:29–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cook IJ, Dent J, Collins SM. Upper esophageal sphincter tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:672–676.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Galmiche JP, Clouse RE, Balint A, et al. Functional esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1459–1465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bradley LA, Richter JE, Scarinci IC, Halle JM, Schan CA. Mechanisms of altered pain perception in non-cardiac chest pain patients. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:A482.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whitehead WE, Croweil MD, Davidoff A, Cheskin L, Schuster MM. Is sexual abuse associated with lower thresholds for pain due to balloon distension of the rectum? Gastroenterology. 1994;106:A588.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant, NSC 99-2314-B-303-005, from the National Science Council, Taiwan. Part of this study was presented as a poster presentation at DDW 2012 in San Diego and was published in abstract form in Gastroenterology (2012) 142 (5 Suppl. 1):S282.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Lin Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, CL., Yi, CH. & Liu, TT. Association Between Swallow Perception and Esophageal Bolus Clearance in Patients with Globus Sensation. Dig Dis Sci 58, 1042–1048 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2463-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2463-2

Keywords

Navigation