Abstract
Objective
The relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), histopathology, and islet yield was examined for chronic pancreatitis patients undergoing total pancreatectomy and autologous islet cell transplant (TP-AIT) to determine if the yield can be predicted by pre-operative MRI.
Methods
MRI sequences and histopathology were scored and compared for patients from whom ≤2,500 islet equivalents/kg were obtained with those from whom >2,500 islet equivalents/kg were obtained.
Results
Twenty patients, 14 female, mean age 40.20 ± 12.5 years, (range 19–63) underwent MRI before TP-AIT; mean 3,724 ± 891 islet equivalents/kg body weight, median 2,970, (range 76–17,770) were procured. There was no correlation between islet cell numbers and pancreas weight, HgbA1c, or c-peptide. The most common MRI sequence abnormality was the delayed interstitial phase, 14/18 (78 %). The other common MRI sequence abnormalities were, precontrast T1W 3D GRE sequence, 13/19 (68 %), and the arterial perfusion phase, 11/18 (61 %). The pancreatic duct was dilated in 10/20 (50 %). Parenchymal atrophy was noted in 10/20 (50 %). Median scores for individual MRI sequences were greater in patients with an islet cell yield of ≤2,500 islet equivalents/kg; for the delayed interstitial phase the difference was significant (median 2.5, range 1–3 versus median 0.5, range 0–3, P = 0.034). Histologically the most common feature was fibrosis, (17/17, 100 %); the score for fibrosis was greater for patients with an islet cell yield of ≤2,500 islet equivalents/kg (median 6.0, range 5–7 versus median 4.0, range 3–7, P = 0.024).
Conclusion
A diminished islet yield may be predicted on the basis of the delayed interstitial phase MRI sequence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AIT:
-
Autologous islet transplant
- CP:
-
Chronic pancreatitis
- H &E:
-
Hematoxylin and eosin
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PV:
-
Portal vein
- TP:
-
Total pancreatectomy
References
Grigsby B, Rodriguez-Rilo H, Khan K. Antioxidants and chronic pancreatitis: theory of oxidative stress and trials of antioxidant therapy. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:835–841.
Rodriguez Rilo HL, Ahmad SA, D’Alessio D, et al. Total pancreatectomy and autologous islet cell transplantation as a means to treat severe chronic pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:978–989.
Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Pitt HA, et al. Quality of life and long-term survival after surgery for chronic pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:355–364.
Banks PA. Epidemiology, natural history, and predictors of disease outcomes in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;56:226–230.
Morrison CP, Wemyss-Holden SA, Partensky C, Maddern GJ. Surgical management of intractable pain in chronic pancreatitis: past and present. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:675–682.
Berney T, Rudisuhli T, Oberholzer J, Caulfield A, Morel P. Long-term metabolic results after pancreatic resection for severe chronic pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1106–1111.
Malka D, Hammel P, Sauvanet A, et al. Risk factors for diabetes mellitus in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1324–1332.
Sutherland DE, Radosevich DM, Bellin MD, et al. Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:409–424.
Sutherland DE, Gruessner RW, Dunn DL, et al. Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2001;233:463–501.
Ahmad SA, Lowy AM, Wray CJ, et al. Factors associated with insulin and narcotic independence after islet autotransplantation in patients with severe chronic pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:680–687.
Kobayashi T, Manivel JC, Carlson AM, et al. Correlation of histopathology, islet yield, and islet graft function after islet autotransplantation in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2011;40:193–199.
Tessier G, Bories E, Arvanitakis M, et al. EUS-guided pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatobulbostomy for the treatment of pain in patients with pancreatic ductal dilatation inaccessible for transpapillary endoscopic therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:233–241.
Kalmin B, Hoffman B, Hawes R, Romagnuolo J. Conventional versus Rosemont endoscopic ultrasound criteria for chronic pancreatitis: comparing interobserver reliability and intertest agreement. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25:261–264.
Manfredi R, Frulloni L, Mantovani W, et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis: pancreatic and extrapancreatic MR imaging-MR cholangiopancreatography findings at diagnosis, after steroid therapy, and at recurrence. Radiology. 2011;260:428–436.
Desai CS, Stephenson DA, Khan KM, et al. Novel technique of total pancreatectomy before autologous islet transplants in chronic pancreatitis patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:29–34.
Balamurugan AN, Loganathan G, Bellin MD, et al. A new enzyme mixture to increase the yield and transplant rate of autologous and allogeneic human islet products. Transplantation. 2012;93:693–702.
Scheringa M, Van der Burg MPM, Basir I, Bouwman E. Assessment of isolated islet equivalents. Transpl Proc. 1997;29:1971–1973.
Zhang XM, Shi H, Parker L, Dohke M, Holland GA, Mitchell DG. Suspected early or mild chronic pancreatitis: enhancement patterns on gadolinium chelate dynamic MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:86–94.
Klöppel G, Detlefsen S, Feyerabend B. Fibrosis of the pancreas: the initial tissue damage and the resulting pattern. Virchows Arch. 2004;445:1–8.
Shimizu M, Hirokawa M, Manabe T. Histological assessment of chronic pancreatitis at necropsy. J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:913–925.
Klöppel G, Maillet B. Pathology of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1993;8:659–670.
Robertson GS, Dennison AR, Johnson PR, London NJ. A review of pancreatic islet autotransplantation. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:226–235.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, K.M., Desai, C.S., Kalb, B. et al. MRI Prediction of Islet Yield for Autologous Transplantation After Total Pancreatectomy for Chronic Pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 58, 1116–1124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2448-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2448-1