Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 1749–1756 | Cite as

Early Signet Ring Cell Gastric Cancer

  • Cheng-Tang Chiu
  • Chia-Jung Kuo
  • Ta-Sen Yeh
  • Jun-Te Hsu
  • Keng-Hao Liu
  • Chun-Nan Yeh
  • Tsann-Long Hwang
  • Yi-Yin Jan
  • Chun-Jung Lin
Original Article



Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) is defined as a histological entity. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of gastric SRC remain controversial.


From 1994 to 2006, 2,439 patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled. Of these, 505 patients (20.7%) had SRC and were compared to 1,934 patients with other histological types.


Twenty-nine percent of patients in the SRC group (n = 149) had early gastric cancer, with tumor invasion limited to the mucosa or submucosa, compared to 22.2% of patients in the non-SRC group (n = 430). The proportion of regional LN metastases was 10.7 and 16.0% in early SRC and early non-SRC, respectively, (p = 0.115). The 5-year survival rates for patients with early SRC were better than those for patients with early non-SRC (96.1 vs. 89.6%, p = 0.01).


Early gastric SRC has favorable prognosis. There is no significant difference in terms of LN metastasis between SRC histologic type and other histological types. Less-invasive strategies may be acceptable in selected patients with early gastric SRC.


Gastric cancer Signet ring cell carcinoma Histology Prognosis 



The authors thank Shu-Fang Hwang at the Departments of Surgery of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for helpful data analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Watanabe H, Jass JR, Sobin LH. Histological typing of esophageal and gastric tumors: WHO international histological classification of tumors. 2nd ed. Springer: Berlin; 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sugano H, Nakamura K, Kato Y. Pathological studies of human gastric cancer. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1982;32:329–347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lauren P. The two main histological types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ming SC. Gastric carcinoma: a pathological classification. Cancer. 1977;39:2475–2485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antonioli DA, Goldman H. Changes in the location and type of gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1982;50:775–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ribeiro MM, Sarmento JA, Simoes SMA, Bastos J. Prognostic significance of Lauren and Ming classifications and other pathologic parameters in gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1981;47:780–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henson DE, Dittus C, Younes M, et al. Differential trends in the intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in the United States, 1973–2000: increase in the signet ring cell type. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:765–770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Theuer CP, Nastanski F, Brewster WR, et al. Signet ring cell histology is associated with unique clinical features but does not affect gastric cancer survival. Am Surg. 1999;65:915–921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Otsuji E, Yamaguchi Y, Sawai K, Takahashi T. Characterization of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. J Surg Oncol. 1998;67:216–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kunisaki C, Shimada H, Nomura M, et al. Therapeutic strategy for signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1319–1324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JP, Kim SC, Yang HK. Prognostic significance of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Surg Oncol. 1994;3:221–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maehara Y, Sakaguchi Y, Moriguchi S, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Cancer. 1992;69:1645–1650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li C, Kim S, Lai JF, et al. Advanced gastric carcinoma with signet ring cell histology. Oncology. 2007;72:64–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park JM, Jang YJ, Kim JH, et al. Gastric cancer histology: clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic value. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:520–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsui M, Kojima O, Kawakami S, et al. The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer possessing sex hormone receptors. Surg Today. 1992;22:421–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Furukawa H, Iwanaga T, Hiratsuka M, et al. Gastric cancer in young adults: growth accelerating effect of pregnancy and delivery. J Surg Oncol. 1994;55:3–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindblad M, Ye W, Rubio C, Lagergren J. Estrogen and risk of gastric cancer: a protective effect in a nationwide cohort study of patients with prostate cancer in Sweden. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:2203–2207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang XF, Yang L, Mao XY, et al. Pathobiological behavior and molecular mechanism of signet ring cell carcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a comparative study. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:750–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hyung WJ, Noh SH, Lee JH, et al. Early gastric carcinoma with signet ring cell histology. Cancer. 2002;94:78–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim TH, Han SU, Cho YK, et al. Perigastric lymph node status can be a simple prognostic parameter in patients with gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1475–1478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Suematsu T, et al. Most important lymph node information in gastric cancer: multivariate prognostic study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:503–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yokota T, Ishiyama S, Saito T, et al. Treatment strategy of limited surgery in the treatment guidelines for gastric cancer in Japan. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:423–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee JH, Yom CK, Han HS. Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1759–1763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cimerman M, Repse S, Jelenc F, et al. Comparison of Lauren’s, Ming’s, and WHO histological classifications of gastric cancer as a prognostic factor for operated patients. Int Surg. 1994;79:27–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tian MM, Zhao AL, Li ZW, Li JY. Phenotypic classification of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and its relationship with clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3189–3198.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng-Tang Chiu
    • 1
  • Chia-Jung Kuo
    • 1
  • Ta-Sen Yeh
    • 2
  • Jun-Te Hsu
    • 2
  • Keng-Hao Liu
    • 2
  • Chun-Nan Yeh
    • 2
  • Tsann-Long Hwang
    • 2
  • Yi-Yin Jan
    • 2
  • Chun-Jung Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenetrology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations