Skip to main content
Log in

Are the Echogenicities on Intraductal Ultrasonography Really Biliary Microlithiasis?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) is a useful procedure for diagnosing microlithiasis in the bile duct but it is not easy to differentiate between tiny echogenicity and real microlithiasis. We compared the echogenicity seen on IDUS and the findings of bile microscopy (BM) of bile that was collected in the common bile duct (CBD) to determine whether the echogenicity seen on IDUS is real microlithiasis. Methods This prospective study involved a total of 30 patients who experienced biliary pain (n = 11), acute cholecystitis (n = 11) or indeterminate pancreatitis (n = 8) without a filling defect or obstruction in the bile duct. IDUS was performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), followed by bile aspiration for BM. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) was performed if definite echogenic materials were observed on IDUS. Results Of the 30 patients, 23 (77%) had echogenic materials visible in the CBD on IDUS. Of these 23 patients, 13 (57%) were found to have biliary crystals by BM. The size of the echogenic materials was the only significant factor associated with BM positivity. Using the receiver operating curve, the optimal size of the echogenicity to differentiate real microlithiasis was 1.4 mm. Conclusions Optimal concordance between IDUS and BM was observed when the size of the microlithiasis was greater than 1.4 mm; under these conditions the sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 75%, respectively. This information may be useful when deciding whether to perform endoscopic sphincterotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IDUS:

Intraductal ultrasonography

BM:

Bile microscopy

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

EST:

Endoscopic sphincterotomy

CMCs:

Cholesterol monohydrate crystals

CBGs:

Calcium bilirubinate granules

References

  1. Houssin D, Castaing D, Lemoine J, Bismuth H. Microlithiasis of the gallbladder. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;157:20–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sarva RP, Farivar S, Fromm H, Poller W. Study of the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography in the detection of calcified gallstones which appears radiolucent by conventional roentgenography. Gastrointest Radiol. 1981;6:165–167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saraswat VA, Sharma BC, Agarwal DK, Kumar R, Negi TS, Tandon RK. Biliary microlithiasis in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis and unexplained biliary pain: response to therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:1206–1211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ko CW, Sekijima JH, Lee SP. Biliary sludge. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:301–311.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SP, Nicholls JF, Park HZ. Biliary sludge as a cause of acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:589–593.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SP, Maher K, Nicholls JF. Origin and fate of biliary sludge. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:170–176.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohara N, Schaefer J. Clinical significance of biliary sludge. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;12:291–294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takahashi T, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J. Pathogenesis of acute cholecystitis after gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 1990;77:536–539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zinberg J, Chernaik R, Coman E, Rosenblatt R, Brandt LJ. Reversible symptomatic biliary obstruction associated with ceftriaxone pseudolithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1251–1254.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ros E, Navarro S, Bru C, Garcia-Puges A, Valderrama R. Occult microlithiasis in ‘idiopathic’ acute pancreatitis: prevention of relapses by cholecystectomy or ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Gastroenterology. 1991;101:1701–1709.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tseng LJ, Jao YT, Mo LR, Lin RC. Over-the-wire US catheter probe as an adjunct to ERCP in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:720–723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A. Wire-guided intraductal US: an adjunct to ERCP in the management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:31–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM. Prospective evaluation of indeterminate ERCP findings by intraductal ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2086–2092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Verna E, Battezzati P, Stevens P. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abdominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy. 2005;37:715–721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catanzaro A, Pfau P, Isenberg GA, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A. Clinical utility of intraductal US for evaluation of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:648–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:225–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tamada K, Kanai N, Ueno N, et al. Limitations of intraductal ultrasonography in differentiating between bile duct cancer in stage T1 and stage T2: in vitro and in vivo studies. Endoscopy. 1997;29:721–725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tamada K, Ueno N, Tomiyama T, et al. Characterization of biliary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparison with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:341–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delchier JC, Benfredj P, Preaux AM, Metreau JM, Dhumeaux D. The usefulness of microscopic bile examination in patients with suspected microlithiasis: a prospective evaluation. Hepatology. 1986;6:118–122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramond MJ, Dumont M, Belghiti J, Erlinger S. Sensitivity and specificity of microscopic examination of gallbladder bile for gallstone recognition and identification. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:1339–1343.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dahan P, Andant C, Levy P, et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and microscopic examination of duodenal bile in the diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis in 45 patients with normal conventional ultrasonography. Gut. 1996;38:277–281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Kyun Lee.

Additional information

B. J. Kim and P. Kang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, B.J., Kang, P., Lee, J.K. et al. Are the Echogenicities on Intraductal Ultrasonography Really Biliary Microlithiasis?. Dig Dis Sci 55, 836–841 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0770-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0770-z

Keywords

Navigation