Abstract
Background Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) is a useful procedure for diagnosing microlithiasis in the bile duct but it is not easy to differentiate between tiny echogenicity and real microlithiasis. We compared the echogenicity seen on IDUS and the findings of bile microscopy (BM) of bile that was collected in the common bile duct (CBD) to determine whether the echogenicity seen on IDUS is real microlithiasis. Methods This prospective study involved a total of 30 patients who experienced biliary pain (n = 11), acute cholecystitis (n = 11) or indeterminate pancreatitis (n = 8) without a filling defect or obstruction in the bile duct. IDUS was performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), followed by bile aspiration for BM. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) was performed if definite echogenic materials were observed on IDUS. Results Of the 30 patients, 23 (77%) had echogenic materials visible in the CBD on IDUS. Of these 23 patients, 13 (57%) were found to have biliary crystals by BM. The size of the echogenic materials was the only significant factor associated with BM positivity. Using the receiver operating curve, the optimal size of the echogenicity to differentiate real microlithiasis was 1.4 mm. Conclusions Optimal concordance between IDUS and BM was observed when the size of the microlithiasis was greater than 1.4 mm; under these conditions the sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 75%, respectively. This information may be useful when deciding whether to perform endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- IDUS:
-
Intraductal ultrasonography
- BM:
-
Bile microscopy
- ERCP:
-
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
- EST:
-
Endoscopic sphincterotomy
- CMCs:
-
Cholesterol monohydrate crystals
- CBGs:
-
Calcium bilirubinate granules
References
Houssin D, Castaing D, Lemoine J, Bismuth H. Microlithiasis of the gallbladder. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;157:20–24.
Sarva RP, Farivar S, Fromm H, Poller W. Study of the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography in the detection of calcified gallstones which appears radiolucent by conventional roentgenography. Gastrointest Radiol. 1981;6:165–167.
Saraswat VA, Sharma BC, Agarwal DK, Kumar R, Negi TS, Tandon RK. Biliary microlithiasis in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis and unexplained biliary pain: response to therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:1206–1211.
Ko CW, Sekijima JH, Lee SP. Biliary sludge. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:301–311.
Lee SP, Nicholls JF, Park HZ. Biliary sludge as a cause of acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:589–593.
Lee SP, Maher K, Nicholls JF. Origin and fate of biliary sludge. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:170–176.
Ohara N, Schaefer J. Clinical significance of biliary sludge. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;12:291–294.
Takahashi T, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J. Pathogenesis of acute cholecystitis after gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 1990;77:536–539.
Zinberg J, Chernaik R, Coman E, Rosenblatt R, Brandt LJ. Reversible symptomatic biliary obstruction associated with ceftriaxone pseudolithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1251–1254.
Ros E, Navarro S, Bru C, Garcia-Puges A, Valderrama R. Occult microlithiasis in ‘idiopathic’ acute pancreatitis: prevention of relapses by cholecystectomy or ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Gastroenterology. 1991;101:1701–1709.
Tseng LJ, Jao YT, Mo LR, Lin RC. Over-the-wire US catheter probe as an adjunct to ERCP in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:720–723.
Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A. Wire-guided intraductal US: an adjunct to ERCP in the management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:31–36.
Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM. Prospective evaluation of indeterminate ERCP findings by intraductal ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2086–2092.
Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Verna E, Battezzati P, Stevens P. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abdominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy. 2005;37:715–721.
Catanzaro A, Pfau P, Isenberg GA, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A. Clinical utility of intraductal US for evaluation of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:648–652.
Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:225–231.
Tamada K, Kanai N, Ueno N, et al. Limitations of intraductal ultrasonography in differentiating between bile duct cancer in stage T1 and stage T2: in vitro and in vivo studies. Endoscopy. 1997;29:721–725.
Tamada K, Ueno N, Tomiyama T, et al. Characterization of biliary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparison with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:341–349.
Delchier JC, Benfredj P, Preaux AM, Metreau JM, Dhumeaux D. The usefulness of microscopic bile examination in patients with suspected microlithiasis: a prospective evaluation. Hepatology. 1986;6:118–122.
Ramond MJ, Dumont M, Belghiti J, Erlinger S. Sensitivity and specificity of microscopic examination of gallbladder bile for gallstone recognition and identification. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:1339–1343.
Dahan P, Andant C, Levy P, et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and microscopic examination of duodenal bile in the diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis in 45 patients with normal conventional ultrasonography. Gut. 1996;38:277–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
B. J. Kim and P. Kang contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, B.J., Kang, P., Lee, J.K. et al. Are the Echogenicities on Intraductal Ultrasonography Really Biliary Microlithiasis?. Dig Dis Sci 55, 836–841 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0770-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0770-z