Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 719–722 | Cite as

How Adequate is Digital Rectal Exam for Prostate Cancer Screening at Colonoscopy? Can Adequacy be Improved?

Original Paper


Purpose Screening by digital rectal exam (DRE) has been advocated as a means of detecting early-stage prostate cancer. We sought to determine the adequacy of prostate palpation at DRE at colonoscopy, and to devise a method of improving adequacy when the gland is incompletely felt. Materials and Methods Adequacy of prostate palpation in the left lateral position was prospectively assessed in 200 males 40 years or older undergoing colonoscopy, and correlated with body mass index (BMI) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) weight categories. If the prostate was incompletely felt, the patient was asked to flex his knee(s) up toward his chest, and then the exam was repeated. Results The prostate was incompletely felt on initial DRE in 65 of 200 patients (32.5%). Raising the knee(s) toward the chest permitted complete palpation in 62 of those 65 cases. Incomplete palpation showed a strong correlation with BMI (P < 0.0001) and weight category: 3/36 (8.3%) for patients with normal body weight, 14/89 (15.7%) for overweight, 42/68 (61.8%) for obesity, and 6/7 (85.7%) for extreme obesity (P < 0.0001). There were 13 patients in whom no part of the prostate gland could be felt on the initial DRE, and which also correlated with NIH weight class (P < 0.0001). Conclusions The prostate gland is often incompletely palpated at DRE in the left lateral position at colonoscopy, and shows a strong correlation with obesity. Adequacy can be dramatically improved by having the patient raise his knee(s) up toward his chest, a maneuver that takes just seconds to perform.


Prostate cancer Prostate cancer screening Digital rectal exam Colonoscopy 



The author wishes to thank Bin Ge, M.D., M.A. and Gregory Petroski, Ph.D. for statistical support, Dr. Steve Weinstein of the department of urology for advice regarding study design, and Phyllis Stock for assistance in manuscript preparation.


  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M (2002) Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 52:23–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris R, Lohr KN (2002) Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:917–929PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, Levin B, Cohen C, Runowicz CD, Sener S, Saslow D, Eyre HJ (2002) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 52:8–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waye JD, Rex DK, Williams CB (eds) (2003) Colonoscopy: principles and practice. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (MA)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nadler RB, Bushman W, Wyker AW Jr (2002) Standard diagnostic considerations. In: Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Mitchell ME (eds) Adult and pediatric urology, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 55–64Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brendler CB (1998) Evaluation of the urologic patient: History, physical examination, and urinalysis. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds) Campbell’s urology, 7th edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp. 131–157Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Willms JL, Schneiderman H, Algranati PS 1994 Physical diagnosis: bedside evaluation of diagnosis and function. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 533–563Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence panel (NIH Publication No. 98-4083) (1998). National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (MD), pp xivGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murthy GD, Byron DP, Pasquale D (2004) Underutilization of digital rectal examination when screening for prostate cancer. Arch Internal Med 164:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology, M580University of Missouri School of MedicineColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations