Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 357–364 | Cite as

Feasibility and Acceptance of a Home Telemanagement System in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A 6-Month Pilot Study

Original Article


Our purpose was to assess the acceptance and feasibility of a home telemanagement system (HAT) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The HAT consists of a laptop and a scale. Subjects were required to complete weekly self-testing for 6 months. Disease activity, quality of life, and knowledge were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Attitudinal surveys were completed at 6 months. Twenty-five subjects completed the study. Ninety-one percent of patients thought that self-testing was not complicated. Eighty-six percent said that self-testing did not interfere with their usual activities. Ninety-one percent of patients would consider using a HAT in the future. Adherence with self-testing was 91%. Improvements in disease activity and quality of life, and significant improvements in knowledge, were observed after implementation of the HAT. The HAT is feasible and accepted in IBD. We predict that the HAT will positively affect adherence, monitoring, and patient education, resulting in improved disease activity and quality of life.


Inflammatory bowel disease Adherence Guideline Compliance Patient Ambulatory monitoring Telemedicine 



A University of Maryland School of Medicine grant supported this project. The authors would like to thank Mohit Arora, Heather Castro, Ashish Joshi, Ella Rozmarin, and Kiran Sharma for their technical assistance with the telemanagement system. The authors would also like to thank Carla Hackshaw and Nadia Cheevers for their assistance throughout the study.


  1. 1.
    Loftus Jr EV (2004) Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: Incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology 126(6):1504–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faubion Jr WA, Loftus Jr EV, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Sandborn WJ (2001) The natural history of corticosteroid therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 121(2):255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guthrie E, Jackson J, Shaffer J, Thompson D, Tomenson B, Creed F (2002) Psychological disorder and severity of inflammatory bowel disease predict health-related quality of life in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 97(8):1994–1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kane SV, Cohen RD, Aikens JE, Hanauer SB (2001) Prevalence of nonadherence with maintenance mesalamine in quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 96(10):2929–2933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kane S, Huo D, Aikens J, Hanauer S (2003) Medication nonadherence and the outcomes of patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Med 114(1):39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sewitch MJ, Abrahamowicz M, Barkun A, Bitton A, Wild GE, Cohen A, Dobkin PL (2003) Patient nonadherence to medication in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 98(7):1535–1544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin A, Leone L, Castagliuolo I, Di Mario F, Naccarato R (1992) What do patients want to know about their inflammatory bowel disease? Ital J Gastroenterol 24(9):477–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robinson A, Thompson DG, Wilkin D, Roberts C (2001) Guided self-management and patient-directed follow-up of ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial. Lancet 358(9286):976–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finkelstein J, Cabrera MR, Hripcsak G (2000) Internet-based home asthma telemonitoring: can patients handle the technology? Chest 117(1):148–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finkelstein J, Hripcsak G, Cabrera MR (1998) Patients’ acceptance of Internet-based home asthma telemonitoring. Proc AMIA Symp, pp 336–340Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Lusignan S, Wells S, Johnson P, Meredith K, Leatham E (2001) Compliance and effectiveness of 1 year’s home telemonitoring. The report of a pilot study of patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 3(6):723–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Finkelstein J, Cabrera M, Hripcsak G (2003) Home Automated Telemanagement system to facilitate self-care of patients with chronic health conditions. J Syst Cybernet Informatics 2(6):e1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cross RK, Arora M, Finkelstein J (2006) Acceptance of telemanagement is high in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 40(3):200–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lennard-Jones JE (1989) Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 170:2–6, 16–19 discussionPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harvey RF, Bradshaw JM (1980) A simple index of Crohn’s-disease activity. Lancet 1(8167):514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Irvine EJ, Zhou Q, Thompson AK (1996) The Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire: a quality of life instrument for community physicians managing inflammatory bowel disease. CCRPT Investigators. Canadian Crohn’s Relapse Prevention Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 91(8):1571–1578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jowett SL, Seal CJ, Barton JR, Welfare MR (2001) The short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire is reliable and responsive to clinically important change in ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 96(10):2921–2928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eaden JA, Abrams K, Mayberry JF (1999) The Crohn’s and Colitis Knowledge Score: a test for measuring patient knowledge in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 94(12):3560–3566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Finkelstein J, O’Connor G, Friedman RH (2001) Development and implementation of the home asthma telemonitoring (HAT) system to facilitate asthma self-care. Medinfo 10(Pt 1):810–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finkelstein J, Joshi A, Arora M, Amelung P (2005) Impact of home telemanagement in adult asthma. In: Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 2005 International Conference, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maiolo C, Mohamed EI, Fiorani CM, De Lorenzo A (2003) Home telemonitoring for patients with severe respiratory illness: the Italian experience. J Telemed Telecare 9(2):67–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vontetsianos T, Giovas P, Katsaras T, Rigopoulou A, Mpirmpa G, Giaboudakis P, Koyrelea S, Kontopyrgias G, Tsoulkas B (2005) Telemedicine-assisted home support for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: preliminary results after nine-month follow-up. J Telemed Telecare 11(Suppl 1):86–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gomez EJ, Hernando ME, Garcia A, Del Pozo F, Cermeno J, Corcoy R, Brugues E, De Leiva A (2002) Telemedicine as a tool for intensive management of diabetes: the DIABTel experience. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 69(2):163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cordisco ME, Benjaminovitz A, Hammond K, Mancini D (1999) Use of telemonitoring to decrease the rate of hospitalization in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 84(7):860–862, A8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benatar D, Bondmass M, Ghitelman J, Avitall B (2003) Outcomes of chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med 163(3):347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roth A, Kajiloti I, Elkayam I, Sander J, Kehati M, Golovner M (2004) Telecardiology for patients with chronic heart failure: the ‘SHL’ experience in Israel. Int J Cardiol 97(1):49–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnston B, Wheeler L, Deuser J, Sousa KH (2000) Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente Tele-Home Health Research Project. Arch Fam Med 9(1):40–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walmsley RS, Ayres RC, Pounder RE, Allan RN (1998) A simple clinical colitis activity index. Gut 43(1):29–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Finkelstein J, Khare R, Vora D, Arora M (2003) Design and implementation of home automated telemanagement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, New York, pp 207–212Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Finkelstein J, Khare R, Ansell J (2003) Feasibility and patient’s acceptance of home automated telemanagement of oral anticoagulation therapy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, pp 230–234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Veterans Affairs, Maryland Heath Care SystemBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations