Advertisement

Cytotechnology

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 879–890 | Cite as

On reprogramming of tumor cells metabolism: detection of glycogen in the cell lines of hepatocellular origin with various degrees of dedifferentiation

  • Natalya P. Teryukova
  • Victoria V. Malkova
  • Elena I. Sakhenberg
  • Vadim A. Ivanov
  • Natalia N. Bezborodkina
  • Sergei A. Snopov
Article
  • 135 Downloads

Abstract

The reprogramming of cancer cells includes shifts in glucose and glycogen metabolism. The aim of our work was to check the ability of forming glycogen grains in hepatocellular tumor cell lines of various dedifferentiation levels. We studied the monolayer culture established in vitro after explanting cells from rat ascites Zajdela hepatoma strain C (ZH-C) as a “parental” line and its five daughter clonal sublines: the holoclonal sublines 3H, 5F, 6H and the meroclonal ones 1E, 9C, which possess, respectively, the properties of cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) and cancer progenitor-like cells (CPLCs). Besides, we studied four permanent cell lines of a rat hepatoma HTC, two murine hepatomas BWTG3 and MH-22a, and human hepatoblastoma HepG2. We used normal rat hepatocytes as positive control cells that form glycogen. We estimated relative cell dedifferentiation levels of the studied lines via analysis of cell morphology, morphometry and motility character on stained cell preparations and lifetime video files. Glycogen in the cells was detected using a Schiff type Au-SO2 reagent. All studied hepatocellular tumor lines were not of equal dedifferentiation level as manifested by different nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio, by epithelium-like or fibroblast-like morphology, by tight or loosen intercellular contacts, by cell migration of collective or individual types. Glycogen fluorescence of uneven intensity was observed in all normal rat hepatocytes, but only in some cell groups or in single cells of hepatocellular tumor lines. The large or small fluorescent grains were found not only in relatively less dedifferentiated parental ZH-C line, BWTG3 and HepG2 lines, but also in moderately dedifferentiated 1E and HTC lines and even in severely dedifferentiated 3H, 5F and 6H sublines, as well as in the islets of the rat ascites hepatoma induced in vivo by the injection of 3H cells (the tumor-initiating cells). On the other hand, MH-22 and 9C lines, being relatively less and moderately dedifferentiated, showed no glycogen fluorescence. Thus, in 10 tumor cell lines of hepatocellular origin, an ability to reserve glycogen manifested no obvious dependency on their dedifferentiation level. Glycogen grains were detected in some cells even of the severely dedifferentiated lines: in single CSLCs of holoclonal ZH sublines grown in vitro and in a majority of tumor-initiating cells derived from ascites hepatoma in vivo. We suggest that dynamic changes in glycogen formation in CSLCs and tumor-initiating cells might be of importance for their dedifferentiation, self-renewal in vitro, survival and metastasis in vivo. The role of glycogen in maintaining viability and metastasis of tumor cells is to be further studied.

Keywords

Cancer stem-like cells Glycogen Hepatocellular tumor cell lines Hepatoma Zajdela Tumor reprogramming Types of cell migration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Yurii A. Neguliaev for his selfless help in video recording. The research was supported by a grant of Russian Science Foundation to E.I.S. (14-50-00068).

Compliance with ethical standards

The animal experiments were conducted in conformity with international and Russian laws and policies

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bettum IJ, Gorad SS, Barkovskaya A, Pettersen S, Moestue SA, Vasiliauskaite K, Tenstad E, Øyjord T, Risa Ø, Nygaard V, Mælandsmo GM, Prasmickaite L (2015) Metabolic reprogramming supports the invasive phenotype in malignant melanoma. Cancer Lett 366:71–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezborodkina NN, Kirshina EI, Mushinskaya EV, Kudryavtsev BN (2009) Application of Schiff”s reagents with various spectral characteristics to determine the content of labile and stabile glycogen fractions in isolated hepatocytes. Tsitologiia 51:1025–1035 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  3. Bgatova NP, Gavrilova YS, Yuy RI, Ergazina MZh (2015) Comparative ultrastructural analysis of hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma. Vestnik Kazan Med University 2:492–496 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  4. Bismut H, Caron M, Coudray-Lucas C, Capeau J (1995) Glucose contribution to nucleic acid base synthesis in proliferating hepatoma cells: a glycine-biosynthesis-mediated pathway. Biochem J 308:761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen J, Lee HJ, Wu X, Huo L, Kim SJ, Xu L, Wang Y, He J, Bollu LR, Gao G, Su F, Briggs J, Liu X, Melman T, Asara JM, Fidler IJ, Cantley LC, Locasale JW, Weihua Z (2015a) Gain of glucose-independent growth upon metastasis of breast cancer cells to the brain. Cancer Res 75:554–565.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen RJ, Zhang G, Garfield SH, Shi YJ, Chen KG, Leapman RD, Robey PG (2015b) Variations in glycogen synthesis in human pluripotent stem cells with altered pluripotent states. PLoS ONE 10:e0142554.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson SM, Papagiannakopoulos T, Olenchock BA, Heyman JE, Keibler MA, Luengo A, Bauer MR, Jha AK, O’Brien JP, Pierce KA, Gui DY, Sullivan LB, Wasylenko TM, Subbaraj L, Chin CR, Stephanopolous G, Mott BT, Jacks T, Clish CB, Vander Heiden MG (2016) Environment impacts the metabolic dependencies of Ras-driven non-small cell lung cancer. Cell Metab 23:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeBerardinis RJ, Chandel NS (2016) Fundamentals of cancer metabolism. Sci Adv 2:e1600200.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Favaro E, Harris AL (2013) Targeting glycogen metabolism: a novel strategy to inhibit cancer cell growth? Oncotarget 4:3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Favaro E, Bensaad K, Chong MG, Tennant DA, Ferguson DJ, Snell C, Steers G, Turley H, Li JL, Günther UL, Buffa FM, McIntyre A, Harris AL (2012) Glucose utilization via glycogen phosphorylase sustains proliferation and prevents premature senescence in cancer cells. Cell Metab 16:751–764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gandalovičová A, Vomastek T, Rosel D, Brábek J (2016) Cell polarity signaling in the plasticity of cancer cell invasiveness. Oncotarget 7:22025–22049.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7214 Google Scholar
  12. Hammond KD, Balinsky D (1978) Activities of key gluconeogenic enzymes and glycogen synthase in rat and human livers, hepatomas, and hepatoma cell cultures. Cancer Res 38:1317–1322Google Scholar
  13. Hay N (2016) Reprogramming glucose metabolism in cancer: can it be exploited for cancer therapy? Nat Rev Cancer 16:635–649.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin Y, White FH, Yang L (1993) A histological morphometric study of nuclear size in benign and malignant neoplasms of the human cheek. Histopathology 23:271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jögi A, Vaapil A, Johansson M, Påhlman S (2012) Cancer cell differentiation heterogeneity and aggressive behavior in solid tumors. Ups J Med Sci 117:217–224.  https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.659294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiseleva NS, Pavlotskii AI, Morozov YuE, Fuks BB (1972) Comparative cytospectrophotometric research of the content of DNA in cellular nucleus of an ascites Zajdela hepatoma and metastases of this tumor in paratracheal lymph nodes. Tsitologiia 14:896–900 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  17. Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV (2011) Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 11:325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kudryavtseva MV, Zavadskaya EE, Skorina AD, Smirnova SA, Kudryavtsev BN (1983) The method for obtaining isolated liver cells from material of intravital puncture biopsies. Lab Delo 9:21–22 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  19. Layfield LJ, Esebua M, Frazier SR, Hammer RD, Bivin WW, Nguyen V, Ersoy I, Schmidt RL (2017) Accuracy and reproducibility of nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio assessments in urinary cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 45:107–112.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lea MA, Murphy P, Morris HP (1972) Glycogen metabolism in regenerating liver and liver neoplasms. Cancer Res 32:61–66Google Scholar
  21. Lee WN, Guo P, Lim S, Bassilian S, Lee ST, Boren J, Cascante M, Go VL, Boros LG (2004) Metabolic sensitivity of pancreatic tumour cell apoptosis to glycogen phosphorylase inhibitor treatment. Br J Cancer 91:2094–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lunt SY, Vander Heiden MG (2011) Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27:441–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magnusson KP, Satalino R, Qian W, Klein G, Wiman KG (1998) Is conversion of solid into more anoxic ascites tumors associated with p53 inactivation? Oncogene 17:2333–2337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McBride A, Ghilagaber S, Nikolaev A, Hardie DG (2009) The glycogen-binding domain on the AMPK β subunit allows the kinase to act as a glycogen sensor. Cell Metab 9:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Obel LF, Muller MS, Walls AB, Sickmann HM, Bak LK, Waagepetersen HS, Schousboe A (2012) Brain glycogen—new perspectives on its metabolic function and regulation at the subcellular level. Front Neuroenerg 4:3.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2012.00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pavlova NN, Thompson CB (2016) The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab 23:27–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pelletier J, Bellot G, Gounon P, Lacas-Gervais S, Pouysségur J, Mazure NM (2012) Glycogen synthesis is induced in hypoxia by the hypoxia-inducible factor and promotes cancer cell survival. Front Oncol 2:18.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2012.00018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pescador N, Villar D, Cifuentes D, Garcia-Rocha M, Ortiz-Barahona A, Vazquez S, Ordoñez A, Cuevas Y, Saez-Morales D, Garcia-Bermejo ML, Landazuri MO, Guinovart J, del Peso L (2010) Hypoxia promotes glycogen accumulation through hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-mediated induction of glycogen synthase. PLoS ONE 1:e9644.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petrov YuP, Teryukova NP, Sakhenberg EL, Ivanov VA, Snopov SA (2017) Comparison of cell cycle duration in the monolayer cell line of hepatoma Zajdela and its sublines 3H and 9C cultivated in vitro. Tsitologiia 59:23–29 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  30. Ros S, Schulze A (2012) Linking glycogen and senescence in cancer cells. Cell Metab 16:687–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schamhart DHJ, Van de Poll KW, Van Wijk RV (1979) Comparative studies of glucose metabolism in HTC, RLC, MH1C, and Reuber H35 rat hepatoma cells. Cancer Res 39:1051–1055Google Scholar
  32. Soga T (2013) Cancer metabolism: key players in metabolic reprogramming. Cancer Sci 104:275–281.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Song K, Kwon H, Han C, Zhang J, Dash S, Lim K, Wu T (2015) Active glycolytic metabolism in CD133 (+) hepatocellular cancer stem cells: regulation by MIR-122. Oncotarget 6:40822–40835.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5812 Google Scholar
  34. Staedel C, Beck JP (1978) Resurgence of glycogen synthesis and storage capacity in cultured hepatoma cells. Cell Differ 7:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teryukova NP, Blinova GI, Ivanov VA (2013) Zajdela hepatoma cells cultured in vitro. Cell Tissue Biol 7:245–252.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X13030127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teryukova NP, Sakhenberg EI, Ivanov VA, Snopov SA (2017) Establishment and characterization of monolayer hepatoma Zajdela clonal lines with signs of cancer stem cells and progenitor cells. Cell Tissue Biol 11:161–171.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X17020079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Jeught M, Taelman J, Duggal G, Ghimire S, Lierman S, de Sousa Chuva, Lopes SM, Deforce D, Deroo T, De Sutter P, Heindryckx B (2015) Application of small molecules favoring Naïve pluripotency during human embryonic stem cell derivation. Cell Reprogr 17:170–180.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2014.0085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vander Heiden MG (2011) Targeting cancer metabolism: a therapeutic window opens. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:671–684.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3504 Google Scholar
  39. Ward PS, Thompson CB (2012) Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even Warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell 21:297–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White FH, Gohari K (1981) Variations in the nuclear-cytoplasmic ration during epithelial differentiation in experimental oral carcinogenesis. J Oral Pathol 10:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zajdela F (1963) Application of an ascites hepatoma for study on cytology of cancer. Vopr Onkol 9:25–33 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  42. Ždralević M, Marchiq I, Cunha de Padua MM, Parks SK, Pouysségur J (2017) Metabolic plasiticy in cancers—distinct role of glycolytic enzymes GPi, LDHs or membrane transporters MCTs. Front Oncol 7:313.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang J, Khvorostov I, Hong JS, Oktay Y, Vergnes L, Nuebel E, Wahjudi PN, Setoguchi K, Wang G, Do A, Jung H-L, McCaffery JM, Kurland IJ, Reue K, Lee W-NP, Koehler CM, Teitell MA (2011) UCP2 regulates energy metabolism and differentiation potential of human pluripotent stem cells. EMBO J 30:4860–4873.  https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou W, Choi M, Margineantu D, Margaretha L, Hesson J, Cavanaugh C, Blau CA, Horwitz MS, Hockenbery D, Ware C, Ruohola-Baker H (2012) HIF1alpha induced switch from bivalent to exclusively glycolytic metabolism during ESC-to-EpiSC/hESC transition. EMBO J 31:2103–2116.  https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zois CE, Harris AL (2016) Glycogen metabolism has a key role in the cancer microenvironment and provides new targets for cancer therapy. J Mol Med 94:137–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-015-1377-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of CytologyRussian Academy of SciencesSaint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Herzen State Pedagogical University of RussiaSaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations