Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetic characterization of Amaranthus caudatus L. and Amaranthus hybridus subsp. cruentus (L.) Thell.

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is aimed to identify genetic variability between two species of Amaranthus viz., A. caudatus and A. hybridus subsp. cruentus, two economically important species, cultivated mainly for grain production. Karyomorphological studies in Amaranthus are scarce, probably due to higher number of small sized chromosomes. Karyomorphological studies were conducted using mitotic squash preparation of young healthy root tips. Karyological parameters and karyotypic formula were established using various software programs and tabulated the karyomorphometric and asymmetry indices viz., Disparity index, Variation coefficient, Total forma percentage, Karyotype asymmetry index, Syi index, Rec index, Interchromosomal and Intrachromosomal asymmetry index and Degree of asymmetry of karyotypes. The mitotic chromosome number observed for A. caudatus was 2n = 32 with a gametic number n = 16 and A. hybridus subsp. cruentus was 2n = 34 with a gametic number n = 17. In A. caudatus the chromosome length during somatic metaphase ranged from 0.8698 to 1.7722 μm with a total length of 39.1412 μm. In A. hybridus subsp. cruentus the length of chromosome ranged from 0.7756 to 1.9421 μm with a total length of 44.9922 μm. Various karyomorphometry and asymmetry indices analyzed revealed the extend of interspecific variation and their evolutionary status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham Z, Prasad PN (1983) A system of chromosome classification and nomenclature. Cytologia 48:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anil SR, Suhara Beevy S, Siril EA (2013) Karyosystematic studies in Amorphophallus Blume ex Decne. J Root Crops 39:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Arno H (1963) Cytological studies in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan. IX. The karyotype analysis and phylogenetic considerations on Pertya and Ainsliaea. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 76:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressani R (1989) The proteins of grain amaranths. Food Res Int 5:213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant WF (1959a) Cytogenetic studies in Amaranthus: I. Cytogenetical aspects of sex determination in dioecious species. Can J Bot 37:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant WF (1959b) Cytogenetic studies in Amaranthus: II. Natural interspecific hybridation between Amaranthus dubius and A. spinosus. Can J Bot 37:1063–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant WF (1959c) Cytogenetic studies in Amaranthus: III. Chromosome numbers and phylogenetic aspects. Can J Genet Cytol 1:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber J, Speta F (1976) C-banded karyotypes in the Scilla hohenackeri group, S. persica and Puschkinia (Liliaceae). Plant Syst Evol 126:149–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra M (2008) Chromosome number in plant cytotaxonomy:concepts and implications. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:339–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauptli H, Jain S (1984) Biosystematics and agronomic potential of some weedy and cultivated amaranths. Theor Appl Genet 69:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Huziwara Y (1962) The karyotype analysis in some genera of Compositae X: the chromosome of some European species of Aster. Bot Mag 75:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolano B, Pando LG, Maluszynska J (2001) Molecular cytogenetic studies in Chenopodium quinoa and Amaranthus caudatus. Acta Soc Bot Pol 70:85–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty BD, Ghosh PD, Maity S (1991) Chromosome analysis in cultured cells of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): structural alterations in chromosomes. Cytologia 56:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Pandley RM, Khoshoo TM (1982) Evolution and improvements of cultivated Amaranths IX. Cytogenetic relationships between the two basic chromosome numbers. J Hered 73:353–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Ohri D, Subrahmanyam GV (2000) A new basic chromosome number for Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae). Cytologia 65:13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammour RH, Radwan SA, Mira M (2012) Genetic diversity in genus Amaranthus: from morphology to genomic DNA. Res Rev Biosci 6:351–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer JD (1967) The grain amaranths and their relatives: a revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann Mo Bot Gard 54:102–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava R, Roy BK (2014) A new chromosome number for Amaranthus blitum. JNBR 3:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker JΒ (1986) Amaranth: the once and future crop. Bioscience 36:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venora G, Blangiforti S, Castiglione MR, Pignone D, Losavio F, Cremonini R (2002) Chromatin organization and computer aided karyotyping of Triticum durum Desf. Cv. Timilia. Caryologia 55:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma BN (1980) Karyotype analysis in three species of Rhizoclonium Kütz. Cytologia 45:433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe K, Yahara T, Denda T, Kosuge K (1999) Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae): statistcal tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. J Plant Res 112:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarco CR (1986) New method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon 35:526–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First author kindly acknowledges Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment for providing financial assistance through KSCSTE fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Prajitha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prajitha, V., Thoppil, J.E. Cytogenetic characterization of Amaranthus caudatus L. and Amaranthus hybridus subsp. cruentus (L.) Thell.. Cytotechnology 70, 95–101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-017-0100-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-017-0100-9

Keywords

Navigation