Advertisement

Cytotechnology

, Volume 65, Issue 5, pp 773–783 | Cite as

Isolation and fractionation of gill cells from freshwater (Lasmigona costata) and seawater (Mesodesma mactroides) bivalves for use in toxicological studies with copper

  • Lygia S. NogueiraEmail author
  • Chris M. Wood
  • Patricia L. Gillis
  • Adalto Bianchini
Marine Invertebrate Cell Culture

Abstract

Gills cells of the freshwater mussel Lasmigona costata and the seawater clam Mesodesma mactroides were isolated (mussel: chemical dissociation; clam: mechanical dissociation) and fractionated (Percoll gradient) into Fractions I and II. Mitochondrial dyes (DASPEI: mussel; MitoTracker®: clam) and Na+, K+-ATPase activity measurement were used to distinguish between cells of Fractions I and II. For mussel and clam, 80.5 ± 1.5 and 48.3 ± 3.2 % of cells were in Fraction II, respectively. For both species, cells of Fraction II had higher fluorescence emission and higher enzyme activity than those of Fraction I, being characterized as ‘cells rich in mitochondria’. Cells of Fraction II were kept in saline solutions approximating the ionic composition of hemolymph either under control conditions (no Cu addition) or exposed (3 h) to copper (Cu: 5, 9 and 20 μg Cu/L). Cell viability and Cu and Na+ content were measured. For both species, Cu content was higher and Na+ content was lower in cells exposed to 20 μg Cu/L. Furthermore, a strong negative correlation was observed between cell Na+ and Cu content in the two bivalve species, indicating a possible competition between Cu and Na+ for ion-transporting mechanisms or binding sites at gill cells of Fraction II. Considering that Cu is an ionoregulatory toxicant in aquatic invertebrates, these preliminary toxicological data support the idea of using isolated gill cells rich in mitochondria to study the mechanisms underlying the acute toxicity of waterborne Cu in freshwater and marine bivalves.

Keywords

Bioaccumulation Clam Copper Gills Isolated cells Mussel 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Rodney McInnis, Tina Hooey, Jim Bennett, Mark McMaster (Environment Canada) and Robert Boyle and Ana Cristina Kalb (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Brazil), and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. This research was supported by awards from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC, Ottawa, ON, Canada) to A. Bianchini and C.M. Wood, the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília, DF, Brazil), and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brasília, DF, Brazil). A. Bianchini is a research fellow from the Brazilian CNPq (Proc. #304430/2009-9) and is supported by the International Research Chair Program from IDRC. C.M. Wood is supported by the Canada Research Chair Program. PL. Gillis is supported by Environment Canada.

References

  1. ASTM (2006) Standard Guide for Conducting Laboratory Toxicity Tests with Freshwater Mussels (E2455-05). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianchini A, Castilho PC (1999) Effects of zinc exposure on oxygen consumption and gill Na+, K+-ATPase of the estuarine crab Chasmagnathus granulata Dana, 1851 (Decapoda, Grapsidae). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 62:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigas M, Durfort M, Poquet M (2001) Cytological effects of experimental exposure to Hg on the gill epithelium of the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis: ultrastructural and quantitative changes related to bioaccumulation. Tissue Cell 33:178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard J, Grosell M (2006) Copper toxicity across salinities from freshwater to seawater in the euryhaline fish Fundulus heteroclitus: is copper an ionoregulatory toxicant in high salinities? Aquat Toxicol 80:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buhariwalla HEC, Osmond EM, Barnes KR, Cozzi RRF, Robertson GN, Marshall WS (2012) Control of ion transport by mitochondrion-rich chloride cells of eurythermic teleost fish: cold shock vs. cold acclimation. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 162:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castaño A, Bols N, Braunbeck T, Dierickx P, Halder M, Isomaa B, Kawahara K, Lee LEJ, Mothersill C, Pärt P, Repetto G, Sintes JR, Rufli H, Smith R, Wood C, Segner H (2003) The use of fish cells in ecotoxicology: the report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 47. ATLA 31:317–351Google Scholar
  8. CCME (2005) Canadian water quality guidelines. Canadian council of ministers of the environment, Environment CanadaGoogle Scholar
  9. Chelomin VP, Zakhartsev MV, Kurilenko AV, Belcheva NN (2005) An in vitro study of the effect of reactive oxygen species on subcellular distribution of deposited cadmium in digestive gland of mussel Crenomytilus grayanus. Aquat Toxicol 73:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CONAMA, 2005. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução no 357, de 17 de março de 2005Google Scholar
  11. Dietz TH (1979) Uptake of sodium and chloride by freshwater mussels. Can J Zool 57:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher SW, Stromberg P, Bruner KA, Boulet LD (1991) Molluscicidal activity of potassium to the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha: toxicity and mode of action. Aquat Toxicol 20:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiske CH, Subbarow Y (1925) The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 66:375–400Google Scholar
  14. Fletcher M, Kelly SP, Part P, O’Donnell MJ, Wood CM (2000) Transport properties of cultured branchial epithelia from freshwater rainbow trout: a novel preparation with mitochondria-rich cells. J Exp Biol 203:1523–1537Google Scholar
  15. Galvez F, Reid SD, Hawkings G, Goss GG (2002) Isolation and characterization of mitochondria-rich cell types from the gill of freshwater rainbow trout. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282:R658–R668Google Scholar
  16. Galvez F, Tsui T, Wood CM (2008) Cultured trout gill epithelia enriched in pavement cells or in mitochondria-rich cells provides insights into Na+ and Ca2+ transport. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 44:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gómez-Mendikute A, Elizondo M, Venier P, Cajaraville MP (2005) Characterization of mussel gill cells in vivo and in vitro. Cell Tissue Res 321:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goss GG, Adamia S, Galvez F (2001) Peanut lectin binds to a subpopulation of mitochondria-rich cells in the rainbow trout gill epithelium. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281:R1718–R1725Google Scholar
  19. Goss G, Gilmour K, Hawkings G, Brumbach JH, Huynh M, Galvez F (2011) Mechanism of sodium uptake in PNA negative MR cells from rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss as revealed by silver and copper inhibition. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 159:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grosell M, Nielsen C, Bianchini A (2002) Sodium turnover rate determines sensitivity to acute copper and silver exposure in freshwater animals. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 133:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kays WT, Silverman H, Dietz TH (1990) Water channels and water canals in the gill of the freshwater mussel, Ligumia subrostrata: ultrastructure and histochemistry. J Exp Zool 254:256–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelly SP, Fletcher M, Part P, Wood CM (2000) Procedures for the preparation and culture of ‘reconstructed’ rainbow trout branchial epithelia. Methods Cell Sci 22:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kültz D (2001) Cellular osmoregulation: beyond ion transport and cell volume. Zoology 104:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Le Pennec G, Le Pennec M (2001) Acinar primary cell culture from the digestive gland of Pecten maximus (L): an original model for ecotoxicological purposes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 259:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lilius H, Sandbacka M, Isomaa B (1995) The use of freshly isolated gill epithelial cells in toxicity testing. Toxicol In Vitro 9:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin LY, Hwang PP (2004) Mitochondria-rich cell activity in the yolk-sac membrane of tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) larvae acclimatized to different ambient chloride levels. J Exp Biol 207:1335–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin LY, Horng JL, Kunkel JG, Hwang PP (2006) Proton pump-rich cell secretes acid in skin of zebrafish larvae. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol C371-C378Google Scholar
  28. Lopes TM, Barcarolli IF, Oliveira CB, Souza MM, Bianchini A (2011a) Effect of copper on ion content in isolated mantle cells of the marine clam Mesodesma mactroides. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:1582–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopes TM, Barcarolli IF, Oliveira CB, Souza MM, Bianchini A (2011b) Mechanism of copper accumulation in isolated mantle cells of the marine clam Mesodesma mactroides. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:1586–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCormick SD (1993) Method for non-lethal gill biopsy and measurement of Na+, K+-ATPase activity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:656–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinho GLL, Pedroso MS, Rodrigues SC, Souza SS, Bianchini A (2007) Physiological effects of copper in the euryhaline copepod Acartia tonsa: waterborne versus waterborne plus dietborne exposure. Aquat Toxicol 84:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quinn B, Costello MJ, Dorange G, Wilson JG, Mothersill C (2009) Development of an in vitro culture method for cells and tissues from the zebra-mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Cytotechnology 59:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid SP, Hawkings GS, Galvez F, Goss GG (2003) Localization and characterization of phenamil-sensitive Na+ influx in isolated rainbow trout gill epithelial cells. J Exp Biol 206:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Renault T, Flaujac G, Le Deuff R-M (1995) Isolation and culture of heart cells from the European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis. Methods Cell Sci 17:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz ML, Dimock RV Jr (2001) Ultrastructural evidence for nutritional exchange between brooding unionid mussels and their glochidia larvae. Invertebr Biol 120:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tse WKF, Au DWT, Wong CKC (2006) Characterization of ion channel and transporter mRNA expressions in isolated gill chloride and pavement cells of seawater acclimating eels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 346:1181–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wong CKC, Chan DKO (1999) Isolation of viable cell types from the gill epithelium of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Am J Physiol 276:R363–R372Google Scholar
  38. Wong CKC, Chan DKO (2001) Effects of cortisol on chloride cells in the gill epithelium of Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. J Endocrinol 168:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lygia S. Nogueira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chris M. Wood
    • 2
  • Patricia L. Gillis
    • 3
  • Adalto Bianchini
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande-FURGRio GrandeBrazil
  2. 2.Department of BiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, National Water Research InstituteEnvironment CanadaBurlingtonCanada

Personalised recommendations