Abstract
Cell culture systems are widely used for the investigation of in vitro immunomodulatory effects of medicines and natural products. Since many pharmacological relevant compounds are water-insoluble, solvents are frequently used in cell based assays. Although many reports describe the cellular effects of solvents at high concentrations, only a few relate the effects of solvents used at low concentrations. In this report we investigate the interference of three commonly used solvents: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethanol and β-cyclodextrin with five different cell culture systems. The effects of the solvents are investigated in relation to the cellular production of interleukin (IL)-6 or reactive oxygen species (ROS) after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. We show that DMSO above 1 % reduces readout parameters in all cell types but more interestingly the 0.25 and 0.5 % solutions induce inhibitory effects in some cell types and stimulatory effects in others. We also found that LPS induced ROS production was more affected than the IL-6 production in the presence of ethanol. Finally we showed that β-cyclodextrin at the investigated concentrations did not have any effect on the LPS induced IL-6 production and only minor effects on the ROS production. We conclude that the effects induced by solvents even at low concentrations are highly relevant for the interpretation of immunomodulatory effects evaluated in cell assays. Furthermore, these results show the importance of keeping solvent concentrations constant in serial dilution of any compound investigated in cell based assays.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Desy O, Carignan D, Caruso M, de Campos-Lima PO (2008) Immunosuppressive effect of isopropanol: down-regulation of cytokine production results from the alteration of discrete transcriptional pathways in activated lymphocytes. J Immunol 181:2348–2355
Desy O, Carignan D, Caruso M, de Campos-Lima PO (2010) Methanol induces a discrete transcriptional dysregulation that leads to cytokine overproduction in activated lymphocytes. Toxicol Sci 117:303–313
Forman S, Kas J, Fini F, Steinberg M, Ruml T (1999) The effect of different solvents on the ATP/ADP content and growth properties of HeLa cells. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 13(11–15):3
Hollebeeck S, Raas T, Piront N, Schneider YJ, Toussaint O, Larondelle Y, During A (2011) Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) attenuates the inflammatory response in the in vitro intestinal Caco-2 cell model. Toxicol Lett 206:268–275
Irie T, Uekama K (1997) Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins.3. Toxicological issues and safety evaluation. J Pharm Sci 86:147–162
Kahler CP (2000) Evaluation of the use of the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide in chemiluminescent studies. Blood Cells Mol Dis 26:626–633
Moesby L, Timm M, Hansen EW (2008) Effect of moist 370 heat sterilisation on the pyrogenicity of cell wall components from Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Pharm Sci 35:442–446
Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63
Nair MP, Kronfol ZA, Schwartz SA (1990) Effects of alcohol and nicotine on cytotoxic functions of human lymphocytes. Clin Immunol Immnopathol 54:395–409
Stella VJ, He Q (2008) Cyclodextrins. Toxicol Pathol 36:30–42
Strober W (2001) Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol Appendix 3, A.3B.1–A.3B.2
Szabo G (1999) Consequences of alcohol consumption on host defence. Alcohol Alcohol 34:830–841
Timm M, Madsen AM, Hansen JV, Moesby L, Hansen EW (2009) Assessment of total inflammatory potential of bioaerosols using a granulocyte assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(24):7655–7662
Wakabayashi I, Negoro M (2002) Mechanism of inhibitory action of ethanol on inducible nitric oxide synthesis in macrophages. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 366:299–306
Xing L, Remick DG (2005) Mechanisms of dimethyl sulfoxide augmentation of IL-1 beta production. J Immunol 174:6195–6202
Zhijun L (2008) Preparation of botanical samples for biomedical research. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 8:112–121
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the excellent technical assistance of Ms. Janne Møgelhøj Colding and Ms. Betina Schøler.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Michael Timm and Lasse Saaby: Contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Timm, M., Saaby, L., Moesby, L. et al. Considerations regarding use of solvents in in vitro cell based assays. Cytotechnology 65, 887–894 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-012-9530-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-012-9530-6