, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 351–362 | Cite as

Towards the molecular characterization of the stable producer phenotype of recombinant antibody-producing NS0 myeloma cells

  • Y. PrietoEmail author
  • L. Rojas
  • L. Hinojosa
  • I. González
  • D. Aguiar
  • K. de la Luz
  • A. Castillo
  • R. Pérez
Original Research


The loss of heterologous protein expression is one of the major problems faced by industrial cell line developers and has been reported by several authors. Therefore, the understanding of the mechanisms involved in the generation of stable and high producer cell lines is a critical issue, especially for those processes based on long term continuous cultures. We characterized two recombinant NS0 myeloma cell lines expressing Nimotuzumab, a humanized anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody. The hR3/H7 clone is a stable producer obtained from the unstable hR3/t16 clone. The unstable clone was characterized by a bimodal distribution of intracellular immunoglobulin staining using flow cytometry. Loss of antibody production was due to the emergence of a non-producer cell subpopulation that increased with cell generation number. Immunoglobulin heavy chain (HC) and light chain (LC) ratio (HC/LC) was lower for the unstable phenotype. Proteomic maps using two dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) were obtained for both clones, at initial cell culture time and after 40 generations. Fifteen proteins potentially associated with the phenomenon of production stability were identified. The hR3/H7 stable clone showed an up-regulated expression pattern for most of these proteins. The regulation of recombinant antibody production by the host NS0 myeloma cell line most likely involves simultaneously cellular processes such as DNA transcription, mRNA processing, protein synthesis and folding, vesicular transport, glycolysis and energy production, according to the proteins identified in the present proteomic study.


Recombinant antibody Protein expression stability NS0 myeloma cell line Proteomics 



We thank Dr. Yassel Ramos Gómez from the Center of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB, Havana, Cuba) for his valuable help in the proteomics assays and Dr. Alejandro López-Requena for a careful reading of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10616_2011_9348_MOESM1_ESM.tif (166 kb)
Supplementary figure 1 . Immunoblot analysis of hR3 antibody chains. HC and LC polypeptides from purified hR3 antibody were detected using an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human γ-chain antibody or a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human ĸ chain antibody, respectively. (TIFF 166 kb)


  1. Agshe VR, Hartl F-U (2000) Roles of molecular chaperones in cytoplasmic protein folding. Cell Dev Biol 11:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alete D, Racher AJ, Birch JR, Stansfield SH, James D, Smales CM (2005) Proteomic analysis of enriched microsomal fractions from GS-NS0 murine myeloma cells with varying secreted recombinant monoclonal antibody productivities. Proteomics 5:4689–4704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes L, Dickson A (2006) Mammalian cell factories for efficient and stable protein expression. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes L, Bentley C, Dickson A (2000) Advances in animal cell recombinant protein production: GS-NS0 expression system. Cytotechnology 32:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes L, Bentley CM, Dickson A (2003) Stability of protein production from recombinant mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes L, Bentley C, Dickson A (2004) Molecular definition of predictive indicators of stable protein expression in recombinant NS0 myeloma cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 85:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes L, Bentley CM, Moy N, Dickson AJ (2007) Molecular analysis of successful cell line selection in transfected GS-NS0 myeloma cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 96:337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castillo A, Victores S, Faife E, Rabasa Y, de la Luz KR (2005) Development of an integrated strategy for recombinant cell line selection. In: Gódia F, Fussenegger M (ed) Animal cell technology meets genomics. Springer, Berlin, pp 505–507Google Scholar
  9. Chevalier S, MacDonald N, Tonge R, Rayner S, Rowlinson R, Shaw J, Young J, Davison M, Roberts R (2000) Proteomic analysis of differential protein expression in primary hepatocytes induced by EGF, tumour necrosis factor alpha or the peroxisome proliferators nafenopin. Eur J Biochem 267:4624–4634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de la Luz KR, Rojas L, Victores S, Lage A, Eyers C, Hart S, Castellanos L, Castillo A, Gaskell S (2008) Proteomic analysis of the adaptation of the host NS0 myeloma cell line to a protein-free medium. Biotecnología Aplicada 24:215–223Google Scholar
  11. Dinnis D, James D (2005) Engineering mammalian cell factories for improved recombinant monoclonal antibody production: lessons from nature? Biotechnol Bioeng 91:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorai H, Csirke B, Scallon B, Ganguly S (2006) Correlation of heavy and light chain mRNA copy numbers to antibody productivity in mouse myeloma production cell lines. Hybridoma 25:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faife E, Rodríguez T, Rabaza Y, Badía T, Victores S, Castillo A (2008) Effects of selection and adaptation of NS0 cells to protein-free medium on the properties, affinity and biological activity of a monoclonal antibody. Biotecnología Aplicada 25:247–253Google Scholar
  14. Gharahdaghi F, Weinberg CR, Meagher DA, Imai BS, Mische SM (1999) Mass spectrometric identification of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels: a method for the removal of silver ions to enhance sensitivity. Electrophoresis 20:601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutchison S, LeBel C, Blanchette M, Chabot B (2002) Distinct sets of adjacent heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A1/A2 binding sites control 5′ splice site selection in the hnRNP A1 mRNA precursor. J Biol Chem 277:29745–29752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Köhler G, Milstein C (1976) Derivation of specific antibody-producing tissue culture and tumour lines by cell fusion. Eur J Inmunol 6:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacIver NJ, Jacobs SR, Wieman HL, Wofford JA, Coloff JL, Rathmell JC (2008) Glucose metabolism in lymphocytes is a regulated process with significant effects on immune cell function and survival. J Leukoc Biol 84:949–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martínez A, Mulshine JL (2002) Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 (hnRNP A2/B1) as a marker of preinvasive lung cancer. J Clin Ligand Assay 25:100–103Google Scholar
  20. Mateo C, Moreno E, Amour K, Lombardero J, Harris W, Pérez R (1997) Humanization of mouse monoclonal antibody that block the EGF-R: recovery of antagonistic activity. Immunotechnology 3:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nasim FU, Hutchison S, Cordeau M, Chabot B (2002) High-affinity hnRNP A1-binding sites and duplex–forming inverted repeats have similar effects on 5′ splice site selection in support of a common looping out and repression model. RNA 8:1078–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nogales E, Wolf SG, Downing KH (1998) Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. Nature 391:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ou XM, Chen K, Shih JC (2006) Monoamine oxidase A and repressor R1 are involved in apoptotic signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10923–10928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Piskunova TS, Yurova MN, Ovsyannikov AI, Semenchenko AV, Zabezhinski MA, Popovich IG, Wang ZQ, Anisimov VN (2008) Deficiency in poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) accelerates aging and spontaneous carcinogenesis in mice. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 754190. Epub Apr 14. PMID: 19415146Google Scholar
  25. Rojas LE, de la Luz KR, Victores S, Castellanos L, Gaskell S, Castillo A, Pérez R (2005) Comparative proteomic study of mechanisms involved in the expression of recombinant monoclonal antibody in non amplified NS0 myeloma cell line. In: Smith R (ed) Cell technology for cell products. Springer Publisher, Berlin, pp 715–721Google Scholar
  26. Schlatter S, Stansfield S, Dinnis DM, Racher A, Birch J, James D (2005) On the optimal ratio of heavy to light chain genes for efficient recombinant antibody production by CHO cells. Biotechnol Prog 21:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seth G, Philp RJ, Lau A, Jiun KY, Yap M, Hu WS (2007) Molecular portrait of high productivity in recombinant NS0 cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(4):933–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M (1996) Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 68:850–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smales CM, Dinnis DM, Stansfield SH, Alete D, Sage EA, Birch JR, Racher AJ, Marshall CT, James DC (2004) Comparative proteomic analysis of GS-NS0 murine myeloma cell lines with varying recombinant monoclonal antibody production rate. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:474–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Voet D, Voet JG (1995) Translation. In: Rose N (ed) Biochemistry, second edition. Wiley, New York, pp 997–1003Google Scholar
  32. Wallrath LL (1998) Unfolding the mysteries of heterochromatin. Curr Opin Genet Dev 8:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitford W (2003) NS0 serum-free culture and applications. BioProcess Int 12:36–47Google Scholar
  34. Wilson C, Bellen HJ, Gehring WJ (1990) Position effects on eukaryotic gene expression. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6:679–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wurm FM (2004) Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cell. Nat Biotechnol 22:1393–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Prieto
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. Rojas
    • 1
  • L. Hinojosa
    • 1
  • I. González
    • 1
  • D. Aguiar
    • 1
  • K. de la Luz
    • 1
  • A. Castillo
    • 1
  • R. Pérez
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and Development DirectionCenter of Molecular ImmunologyPlaya HavanaCuba

Personalised recommendations