Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of cross-contaminated animal cells by PCR and isoenzyme analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animal cell lines have become very popular substrates for the production of vaccines and biopharmaceuticals. Characterization of candidate production cell lines is central to ensure product safety and maintenance of consistency in the manufacture of biologicals. Nested PCR and isoenzyme analysis have been used widely to prove the identity and purity of various cell lines and primary cells individually and also after deliberate cross-contamination. The nested PCR based on the Cytochrome b (Cyt b) gene of mitochondrial DNA (Mt DNA) was found to be more sensitive than isoenzyme analysis in detecting low levels of contaminants (as low as 1%). Interestingly, competition between different co-cultured cell lines has shown in one case that cross-contamination need not always results in a mixed cell population. The nested PCR technique for the Cyt b gene described in this study appears to be a potential replacement for isoenzyme analysis and here we demonstrate the PCR method used is sensitive and reliable for cell line authentication in a simple, rapid and reliable format to help assure the authenticity of cell substrates for the production of safe vaccines and biopharmaceuticals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coecke S, Balls M, Bowe G, Davis J, Gstraunthaler G, Hartung T, Hay R, Merten OW, Price A, Schechtman L, Stacey G, Stokes W (2005) Guidance on good cell culture practice. A report of the second ECVAM task force on good cell culture practice. Altern Lab Anim 33:261–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks WG, MacLeod RAF, Jaeger K, Milch H, Drexler HG (1999) First searchable data base for DNA profile of human cell lines; sequential use of fingerprint techniques for authentication. Cell Mol Biol 45:841–853

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsell MNE, Li Y, Sundback M, Svehla K, Liljestorm P, Masera JR, Wyatt R, Hedestam GBK (2005) Biochemical and immunogenic characterization of soluble human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein trimers expressed by Semliki Forest virus. J Virol 79:10902–10914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freshney RI (2002) Cell line provenance. Cytotechnology 39:55–67. doi:10.1023/A;1022949730029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freshney RI (2006) Culture of cells for tissue engineering. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartler SM (1967) Genetic markers as tracers in cell culture. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 26:167–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halton DM, Peterson WD Jr, Hukku B (1983) Cell culture quality control by rapid isoenzymatic characterization. In Vitro 19:16–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hay RJ (2000) Animal cell culture, a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay RJ (2002) Methods of tissue engineering. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature 316:76–79. doi:10.1038/316076a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keith WN (2000) Animal cell culture, a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu MY, Lin SC, Liu H, Candal F, Vafai A (2003) Identification and authentication of animal cell culture by polymerase chain reaction amplification and DNA sequencing. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 39:424–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Andreo M, Lugo L, Garrido–Pertierra A, Prieto MI, Puyet A (2005) Identification and quantitation of species in complex DNA mixtures by real time polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 339:73–82. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2004.11.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Losi GC, Ferrari S, Sossi E, Villa R, Ferrari M (2008) An alternative method to isoenzyme profile for cell line identification and interspecies cross-contaminations: cytochrome b PCR-RFLP analysis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Animal 44:321–329. doi:10.1007/S11626-008-9125-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic O, Markovic N (1998) Cell cross-contamination in cell cultures: the silent and neglected danger. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34:1–8. doi:10.1007/S11626-998-0040-Y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JR (2000) Human cancer cell lines: facts and fantasy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1:233–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller OJ, Miller DA, Allderdice PW, Dev VG, Grewal MS (1971) Quinacrine fluorescent karyotypes of human diploid and heteroploid cell lines. Cytogenetics 10:338–346. doi:10.1007/BF02633971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees W, Flandermeyer RR (1977) Inter-and intraspecies contamination of human breast tumor cell lines HBC and BrCa5 and other cell cultures. Science 195:1343–1344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA, Flandermeyer RR, Hawthorne PK (1974) Banded marker chromosome as indicators of intraspecies cellular contamination. Science 184:1093–1096. doi:10.1126/Science.184.4141.1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA, Daniels DW, Flandermeyer RR (1989) Contamination of cells in culture. Science 212:446–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nims RW, Herbstritt CJ (2005) Cell line authentication using isoenzyme analysis. BioPharm Int 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Nims RW, Shoemaker AP, Bauernschub MA, Rec LJ, Harbell JW (1998) Sensitivity of isoenzyme analysis for the detection of interspecies cell line cross-contamination. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34:35–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien SJ, Shannon JE, Gail MH (1980) A molecular approach to the identification and individualization of human and animal cells in culture: isozyme and allozyme genetic signatures. In Vitro 16:119–135. doi:10.1007/BF02831503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole CM, Pavey S, Hepburn P, Frank LM (1983) Identity of some human bladder cancer lines. Nature 201:429–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono K, Satoh M, Yoshida T, Ozawa Y, Kohara A, Takeuchi M (2007) Species identification of animal cells by nested PCR targeted to mitochondrial DNA. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. doi:10.1007/S11626-007-9033-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Parodi B, Aresu O, Bini D, Lorenzini R, Schena F, Visconti P et al (2002) Species identification and confirmation of human and animal cell lines: a PCR-based method. Biotechniques 32:432–440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey GN, Bolton BJ, Doyle A (1992) DNA fingerprinting transforms the art of cell authentication. Nature 357:261–262. doi:10.1038/35726/a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey GN, Hoelzl H, Stephenson JR, Doyle A (1997) Authentication of animal cell cultures by direct visualization of repetitive DNA, aldolase gene PCR and isoenzyme analysis. Biologicals 25:75–85. doi:10.1006/biol.1996.0062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey GN, Masters JR, Hay RJ, Drexler HG, MacLeod RAF, Freshney RI (2000) Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now. Nature 403:356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steube KG, Grunicke D, Drexler HG (1995) Isoenzyme analysis as a rapid method for the examination of the species identity of cell cultures. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 31:115–119. doi:10.1007/BF02633971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stulberg CS, Peterson WR Jr, Simpson WF (1976) Identification of cells in culture. Am J Hematol 1:237–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks are due to Dr. Glyn N. Stacey for his valuable suggestions, constant support and critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Rajan Sriraman and Dr. Mohanasubramanian of Plant Biotechnology and Dr. S. B. Nagendrakumar and Dr. M. Madhanmohan of Foot- and- mouth disease virus laboratory at R and D center, Indian Immunologicals Limited, Hyderabad for their excellent technical support and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Srinivasan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramya, R., Nagarajan, T., Sivakumar, V. et al. Identification of cross-contaminated animal cells by PCR and isoenzyme analysis. Cytotechnology 61, 81–92 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-009-9245-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-009-9245-5

Keywords

Navigation