Jean Knox: Self-Agency in Psychotherapy
How does one develop a sense of “me-ness” (self) and “I-ness” (self-agency)? What are the neurobiologic and relational foundations of these processes? What might a focus on attachment security, mentalization, and self-agency mean for therapists? What is it about traditional Freudian, Jungian, and Kleinian narratives that could lead therapists to employ (to borrow from Cronenberg and Kerr) “a most dangerous method?” (Kerr 1993). Drawing on “relational, emergent, constructivist, and sometimes constructionist perspectives on the self,” these are questions which psychiatrist and analytic psychologist Jean Knox tackles in Self-Agency in Psychotherapy (p. 7).
Before exploring the details of Knox’s excellent integration, a few definitions for the uninitiated or reminders for those in-the-know seem in order. First, recall that analytical psychology is another name for the branch of psychology/analysis practiced in the Jungian tradition. It should be noted that even for those whose familiarity...
- Holmes, J. (2001). The search for the secure base. London: Brunner-Rutledge.Google Scholar
- Kerr, J. (1993). A most dangerous method. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobiological and social-emotional development of children. New York: Norton.Google Scholar