The Role of Systematic Reviews and the Campbell Collaboration in the Realization of Evidence-Informed Practice
- 487 Downloads
Evidence-informed practice asks practitioners and policy-makers to integrate current best evidence with client context in order to provide meaningful and potentially effective services across a range of presenting problems. Done correctly, systematic reviews are a crucial part of this process, providing social workers and other helping professionals with transparent, rigorous, and informative syntheses of research in a given area. This paper makes clear the need for systematic reviews in social work, briefly explains what systematic reviews are and how they are made, and describes the role of the Campbell Collaboration in creating a world library of systematic reviews.
KeywordsSystematic review Evidence-based practice Evidence-informed practice Meta-analysis Campbell Collaboration
- Becker, B. J. (1990). Item characteristics and gender differences on the SAT-M for mathematically able youths. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 65–87.Google Scholar
- CEBC. (2010). The California evidence-based clearinghouse for child welfare, from http://www.cebc4cw.org/.
- Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. (2010). Blueprints for violence prevention, 2010, from http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints/criteria.html.
- Chalmers, I. (2005). If evidence-informed policy works in practice, does it matter if it doesn’t work in theory? Evidence and policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 1(2), 227–242.Google Scholar
- Coalition for Evidence. (2010). Government-wide evaluation initiative FY11: budget summary, from http://coalition4evidence.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Govt-wide-evaln-initiative-FY11-budget-summary.pdf.
- Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society, 80, 341–350.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, L. E. (2003). Evidence-based practice for the helping professions: A practical guide with integrated multimedia. Pacific Grove, Calif: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
- Guyatt, G. H. (1991). Editorial: Evidence-based medicine. ACP Journal Club, 14(2), A-16.Google Scholar
- Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Littell, J. H., Popa, M., & Forsythe, B. (2005). Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10–17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3).Google Scholar
- Littell, J. H., & Shlonsky, A. (2010). Making sense of meta-analysis: A critique of “effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy”. Clinical Social Work Journal. doi: 10.1007/s10615-010-0308-z.
- Noyes, J., Popay, J., Pearson, A., Hannes, K., & Booth, A. (2009). Cochrane qualitative research methods group. Qualitative research and cochrane reviews. In J. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Rosen, A., & Proctor, E. K. (2002). Standards for evidence-based social work practice. In A. R. Roberts & J. G. Greene (Eds.), The social worker’s desk reference (pp. 743–747). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
- SAMHSA. (2010). National registry of evidence-based programs and practices, from http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/review-quality.asp.
- Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2005). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Scher, L., Maynard, R., & Stagner, M. (2006). Interventions intended to reduce pregnancy- related outcomes among adolescents. Campbell Systematic Reviews(12).Google Scholar
- Shlonsky, A., Saini, M., & Wu, M. (2007). The recurrence of child maltreatment: Predictive validity of risk assessment instruments. Campbell Library of Systematic Reviews.Google Scholar
- Smedslund, G., Hagen, K., Steiro, A., Johme, T., Dalsbø, T., & Rud, M. (2006). Work programmes for welfare recipients. Campbell Systematic Reviews(9).Google Scholar
- Smedslund, G., Dalsbo, T. K., Steiro, A. K., Winsvold, A., & Clench-Aas, J. (2007). Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3).Google Scholar
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- van der Windt, D., Simons, E., Riphagen, I. I., Ammendolia, C., Verhagen, A., Laslett, M., et al. (2010). Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(2).Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
- Winokur, M., Holtan, A., & Valentine, D. (2009). Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(1).Google Scholar