Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 355–361 | Cite as

There are Some Things I Don’t Want to Know: Leichsenring and Rabung’s Long Road to the 2008 JAMA Report

  • David Roseborough
Original paper

Abstract

Psychodynamic practitioners have been slow to evaluate their outcomes empirically and to disseminate these findings publicly. This historic stance is changing, with psychoanalytic leaders now calling for more empirical research and with important, recent contributions. This response lauds the JAMA paper as a developmental achievement among dynamic theorists, and as an example of the kind of interdisciplinary scholarship which is needed. The author offers a critique and raises questions about what constitutes the treatment in these quite disparate treatments, spanning 25 years. It compares their findings to those of a current, clinic-based longitudinal study (N = 1,050), and asks if this latter study’s findings might challenge or at least complicate some of the strong assertions Leichsenring and Rabung make.

Keywords

Psychodynamic psychotherapy Leichsenring and Rabung Effectiveness Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy Meta-analysis Psychoanalytic 

References

  1. Abbass, A., Kisely, S., & Kroenke, K. (2009). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for somatic disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 265–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (2006). Treatment of borderline personality disorder with psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitalization: An 18 month follow-up. Focus, 4, 244–252.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A., & Bahr, S. (2009). Letters: Analyzing the effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(9), 931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, W., Roseborough, D., Pahwa, R., & Jordan, J. (2009). Client improvement over the course of psychodynamic psychotherapy in a community mental health clinic. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 37(4), 665–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doidge, N. (1999). How to preserve psychoanalysis: An introduction to Gunderson & Gabbard. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 673–676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Driessen, E., Cuijpers, P., de Maat, S., Abbass, A., de Jonghe, F., & Dekker, J. (2010). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analaysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(1), 25–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freedman, N., Hoffenberg, J., Vorus, N., & Frosch, A. (1999). The effectiveness of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: The role of treatment duration, frequency of sessions, and the therapeutic relationship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 741–771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabbard, G. O., Gunderson, J. G., & Fonagy, P. (2002). The place of psychoanalytic treatments within psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 505–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kernberg, O. F. (1993). The current state of psychoanalysis. The Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 41, 45–62.Google Scholar
  11. Kirsch, I., Deacon, B. J., Huedo-Medina, T. B., Scoboria, A., Moore, T. J., & Johnson, B. T. (2008). Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: A meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 260–268.Google Scholar
  12. Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and Cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(7), 1223–1232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). The effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(13), 1551–1565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leichsenring, F., Rabung, S., & Leibing, E. (2004). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(12), 1208–1216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nathan, P. E., Stuart, S. P., & Dorn, S. L. (2000). Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: Between Scylla & Charybdis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 964–981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rose, C. (Producer). (2007). The legacy of Sigmund Freud. Charlie Rose. NY: Public Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
  17. Roseborough, D. (2006). Psychodynamic psychotherapy: An effectiveness study. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rossouw, J. E., Anderson, G. L., Prentice, R. L., LaCroix, A. Z., Kooperberg, C., Stefanick, M. L., et al. (2002). Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy post-menopausal women: Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(3), 321–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandell, R., Lazar, A., Grant, J., Carlsson, J., Schubert, J., & Falkenstrom, F. (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy: A review of findings in the Stockholm outcome of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy project (STOPP). International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 921–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vaughan, S. C., Marshall, R. D., Mackinnon, R. A., Vaughan, R., Mellman, L., & Roose, S. P. (2000). Can we do psychoanalytic outcome research? A feasibility study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 513–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Work – SCB 201University of St. ThomasSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations