Abstract
Different aspects of a case will be emphasized depending on the theoretical lens used to understand it. Intersubjectivity theory will be used in case discussion to illustrate how our focus in the case shifts with different theoretical orientations. By using intersubjectivity, the multiple subjectivities: patient, therapist and supervisor’s influence on the therapeutic process are highlighted. Case material is discussed in the context of death and loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman N., (1995). The analyst in the inner city. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press
Aron L., (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in Psychonanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press
Becker E., (1973). The denial of death. New York: The Free Press
Benjamin J., (1988). The bonds of love. New York: Pantheon Books
Benjamin J., (1995). Like subjects, love objects. New Haven: Yale University Press
Benjamin J., (1999). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivty (1990). In S. T. Mitchell, L. Aron, (Eds.), Relational Psychoanalysis the emergence of a tradition, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. pp. 181–210
Berman E., (1997). Psychoanalytic supervision as the crossroads of a relational matrix. In M. H. Rock, (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. pp.161–185
Blos, P., (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child (Vol. 22, pp. 162–186). New York: International Universities Press.
Dunkel, J., & Hatfield, S., (1986). Countertransference issues in working with persons with AIDS. Social Work, March–April, 114–117
Farber E., (1994). Psychotherapy with HIV and AIDS patients: The phenomenon of helplessness in therapists Psychotherapy 31(4, Winter):715–723
Fiscalini J., (1985). On supervisory parataxis and dialogue Contemporary Psychoanalysis 21(4):91–608
Fosshage J., (1997). Toward a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-sychological/intersubjective perspective. In M. H. Rock, (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. pp.189–210
Gediman H., Wokenfield F., (1990). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis: Its reconsideration as a triadic system Psychoanalytic Quarterly 49:234–255
Habermas J., (1970). A theory of communicative competence. In H. P. Dreitzel, (Ed.), Recent sociology 2. New York: Macmillan
Hoffmann I. Z., (1991). Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1:74–105
Kron T., Yerushalmi H., (2000). The intersubjective approach in supervision The Clinical Supervisor 19(1):99–120
Lachmann F., Beebe B., (1992). Representational and self-object transferences: A developmental perspective. In A. Goldberg, (Ed.), New therapeutic visions, progress in self-psychology, 8, Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press. pp. 3–15
Mahler M., (1963). Thoughts about development and individuation The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 18:307–324
Marshall R. J., (1997). The interactional triad in supervision. In M. H. Rock, (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. pp.77–101
Mattei L., (1999). A Latina space: Ethnicity as an intersubjective third Smith Studies in Social Work 69(2):255–267
McLaughlin J. T., (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association 39:595–614
Morgan J. D., (1995). A philosopher looks at children and death. In E. A. Grollman, (Ed.), Bereaved children and teens, Boston: Beacon Press. pp.159–168
Oarnge, Atwood, Stolorow, (1997). Working intersubjectively: Contextualism in psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press
Ogden T., (1994). Subjects of analysis. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Renik O., (1996). The perils of neutrality Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65:495–517
Ringel S., (2001). In the shadow of death: Relational paradigms in clinical supervision Clinical Social Work Journal 29(2):171–179
Stolorow R., Atwood G. E., (1992). Contexts of being. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press
Wolkenfield F., (1990). The parallel process phenomenon revisited: Some additional thoughts about the supervisory process. In R. C. Lane, (Ed.), Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision, New York: Brunner/Mazel pp.95–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cait, CA. Implications of intersubjectivity for supervisory practice. Clin Soc Work J 34, 253–265 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-005-0014-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-005-0014-4