Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 253–265 | Cite as

Implications of intersubjectivity for supervisory practice

Practice/Theory Relationship


Different aspects of a case will be emphasized depending on the theoretical lens used to understand it. Intersubjectivity theory will be used in case discussion to illustrate how our focus in the case shifts with different theoretical orientations. By using intersubjectivity, the multiple subjectivities: patient, therapist and supervisor’s influence on the therapeutic process are highlighted. Case material is discussed in the context of death and loss.


intersubjectivity; second individuation process; supervision; death. 


  1. Altman N., (1995). The analyst in the inner city. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron L., (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in Psychonanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker E., (1973). The denial of death. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin J., (1988). The bonds of love. New York: Pantheon BooksGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin J., (1995). Like subjects, love objects. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin J., (1999). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivty (1990). In S. T. Mitchell, L. Aron, (Eds.), Relational Psychoanalysis the emergence of a tradition, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. pp. 181–210Google Scholar
  7. Berman E., (1997). Psychoanalytic supervision as the crossroads of a relational matrix. In M. H. Rock, (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. pp.161–185Google Scholar
  8. Blos, P., (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child (Vol. 22, pp. 162–186). New York: International Universities Press. Google Scholar
  9. Dunkel, J., & Hatfield, S., (1986). Countertransference issues in working with persons with AIDS. Social Work, March–April, 114–117Google Scholar
  10. Farber E., (1994). Psychotherapy with HIV and AIDS patients: The phenomenon of helplessness in therapists Psychotherapy 31(4, Winter):715–723Google Scholar
  11. Fiscalini J., (1985). On supervisory parataxis and dialogue Contemporary Psychoanalysis 21(4):91–608Google Scholar
  12. Fosshage J., (1997). Toward a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-sychological/intersubjective perspective. In M. H. Rock, (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. pp.189–210Google Scholar
  13. Gediman H., Wokenfield F., (1990). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis: Its reconsideration as a triadic system Psychoanalytic Quarterly 49:234–255Google Scholar
  14. Habermas J., (1970). A theory of communicative competence. In H. P. Dreitzel, (Ed.), Recent sociology 2. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffmann I. Z., (1991). Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1:74–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kron T., Yerushalmi H., (2000). The intersubjective approach in supervision The Clinical Supervisor 19(1):99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lachmann F., Beebe B., (1992). Representational and self-object transferences: A developmental perspective. In A. Goldberg, (Ed.), New therapeutic visions, progress in self-psychology, 8, Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press. pp. 3–15Google Scholar
  18. Mahler M., (1963). Thoughts about development and individuation The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 18:307–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marshall R. J., (1997). The interactional triad in supervision. In M. H. Rock, (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. pp.77–101Google Scholar
  20. Mattei L., (1999). A Latina space: Ethnicity as an intersubjective third Smith Studies in Social Work 69(2):255–267Google Scholar
  21. McLaughlin J. T., (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association 39:595–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan J. D., (1995). A philosopher looks at children and death. In E. A. Grollman, (Ed.), Bereaved children and teens, Boston: Beacon Press. pp.159–168Google Scholar
  23. Oarnge, Atwood, Stolorow, (1997). Working intersubjectively: Contextualism in psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogden T., (1994). Subjects of analysis. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. Google Scholar
  25. Renik O., (1996). The perils of neutrality Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65:495–517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ringel S., (2001). In the shadow of death: Relational paradigms in clinical supervision Clinical Social Work Journal 29(2):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stolorow R., Atwood G. E., (1992). Contexts of being. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolkenfield F., (1990). The parallel process phenomenon revisited: Some additional thoughts about the supervisory process. In R. C. Lane, (Ed.), Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision, New York: Brunner/Mazel pp.95–112Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social WorkWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations