Advertisement

The Impact of Credit Rating on Innovation in a Two-Sector Evolutionary Model

Article

Abstract

Empirical evidence shows that innovative firms are often more constrained in obtaining external funds than less innovative firms. Explanations are based on the uncertain outcome and high costs of R&D effort. When providing credit, the lender assesses the creditworthiness of the borrower. She relies on financial data and market analysis. The financial data analysis reveals costs and the market outlook is linked to the uncertainty of future profitability. In this paper we examine whether the credit assessment behaviour of banks hurts firms of a more innovative sector more and how this affects long term innovative success and economic development. We use an evolutionary approach à la Nelson and Winter but with two sectors. A bank provides credit and supplies it to single firms based on a rating. We illuminate the impact of rating process characteristics on the long term outcome. When the bank does not distinguish for sector-specific features, such as risk and market outlook, the high-tech sector benefits over-proportionally because the surviving firms have a high profitability and further innovations are more likely. The way that the bank forms expectations about the market outlook influences the allocation of credit between sectors. The innovative sector is supplied more credit if the market outlook is assessed in a rather conservative fashion. The impact on aggregates however, is limited because the bank uses other pieces of information as well.

Keywords

Innovation Financial constraints Industrial evolution 

JEL Classification

G32 O16 O33 

References

  1. Aghion, P., Angeletos, G.-M., Banerjee, A., & Kalina, M. (2005). Volatility and growth: Credit constraints and productivity-enhancing investment. NBER working paper No. 11349.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Askenazi, P., Berman, N., Cette, G., & Eymard, L. (2012). Credit constraints and the cyclicality of R&D investment: Evidence from France. Paris School of Economics working paper.Google Scholar
  3. Altman, E. I., & Saunders, A. (1998). Credit risk measurement: Developments over the last 20 years. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21, 1721–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beinert, C., Reichling, P., & Vogt, B. (2007). The discriminative power of rating functions. In A. Yepifanov & F. Shpyh (Eds.), Banks and bank systems (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 32–39).Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Zion, U. (1984). The R&D and investment decision and its relationship to the firm’s market value: Some preliminary results. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents, and productivity (pp. 299–314). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Jacoby, N., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2010). Corporate performances and market selection: Some comparative evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1953–1996.Google Scholar
  7. Bottazzi, G., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2006). Financial fragility and growth dynamics of Italian business firms. LEM WP, No. 2006/07.Google Scholar
  8. Bottazzi, G., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2014). Financial constraints and firm dynamics. Small Business Economics, 42, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, J. R., Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (2009). Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990 R&D boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, J. R., Martinson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2012). Do financing constraints matter for R&D? European Economic Review, 56, 1512–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canepa, A., & Stoneman, P. (2008). Financial constraints to Innovation in the UK: Evidence from CIS2 and CIS3. Oxford Economic Papers, 60, 711–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services. (2014). Evaluation of market practices and policies on SME rating, final report. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/finance/index_en.htm. Accessed November 18, 2014.
  13. Cincera, M., & Ravet, J. (2010). Financing constraints and R&D investments of large corporations in Europe and the US. Science and Public Policy (SPP). 37(6), 455–466.Google Scholar
  14. Coad, A. (2010). Neoclassical vs evolutionary theories of financial constraints: Critique and prospectus. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21(3), 206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colombo, L., Dawid, H., & Kabus, K. (2012). When do thick venture capital markets foster innovation? An evolutionary analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22, 79–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2006). Funding gaps? Access to bank loans by high-tech start-ups. Small Business Economics, 29, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., & Verga, C. (2007). High-tech start-up access to public funds and venture capital: Evidence from Italy. International Review of Applied Economics, 21(3), 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowling, M., Liu, W., & Ledger, A. (2012). Small buisiness financing in the UK before and during the current financial crisis. International Small Business Journal, 30(7), 778–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crouhy, M., Galai, D., & Mark, R. (2000). A comparative analysis of current credit risk models. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 59–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2010). Financing constraints for industrial innovation: What do we know? Review of Business and Economic Literature, 55(3), 346–363.Google Scholar
  21. Dawid, H. (2006). Agent-based models of innovation and technological change. In L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  22. Demirel, P., & Parris, S. (2015). Access to finance for innovators in the UK’s environmental sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(7), 782–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. (2009). Wirtschaftsstrukturen und Produktivität im internationalen Vergleich [Economic structures and productivity in an international comparison]. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, No. 2-2009.Google Scholar
  24. Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., & Treibich, T. (2011). Economic policies with endogenous innovation and Keynesian demand management. http://www.nccert.biz/badania/konferencje/2011/dsge/files/Economic.pdf. Accessed January 29, 2014.
  25. European Parliament. (2006). Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions. Official Journal of the European Union, No. L177/96.Google Scholar
  26. Everling, O., Holschuh, K., & Leker, J. (Eds.). (2009). Credit analyst. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  27. Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology-gaps, innovation–diffusion and transformation: An evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, 31, 1291–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freel, M. S. (2007). Are small investors credit rationed? Small Business Economics, 28, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giudici, G., & Pateari, S. (2000). The provision of finance to innovation: A survey conducted among Italian technology-based small firms. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guiso, L. (1998). High-tech firms and credit rationing. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2009). The financing of R&D and innovation. NBER working paper.Google Scholar
  32. Hao, K. Y., & Jaffe, A. B. (1993). Effect of liquidity on firms’ R&D spending. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2(4), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. (2003). Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy. ETLA discussion papers, No. 820.Google Scholar
  34. Kremer, E., & ten Hoevel, W. (1989). Kredite an Unternehmen: Kreditentscheidung unter dynamischen Aspekten [Corporate credit: Credit decision under dynamic aspects] (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Deutscher Sparkassenverlag.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, J., & Harrison, R. J. (2001). Innovation and industry bifurcation: The evolution of R&D strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 117–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mancusi, M. L., & Vezzuli, A. (2010). R&D, innovation and liquidity constraints. In CONCORD 2010 Conference, Sevilla, March 3–4, 2010.Google Scholar
  37. Marsili, O., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: An empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and corporate change, 11(4), 791–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mina, A., Lahr, H., & Hughes, A. (2013). The demand and supply of external finance for innovative firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 869–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Minola, T., Cassia, L., & Criaco, G. (2013). Financing patterns in new technology-based firms: An extension of the pecking order theory. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19(2), 212–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mohnen, P. A., Palm, F., van der Loeff, S., & Tiwari, A. (2008). Financial constraints and other obstacles: Are they a threat to innovation activity? CESifo working paper, No. 2204.Google Scholar
  41. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambrigde, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
  42. Piga, C. A., & Atzeni, G. (2007). R&D investment, credit rationing and sample selection. Bulletin of Economic Research, 59(2), 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reichling, P., Bietke, D., & Henne, A. (2003). Praxishandbuch Risikomanagement und Rating [Practical handbook risk management and rating] (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  44. Savignac, F. (2008). Impact of financial constraints on innovation: What can be learned from a direct measure? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(6), 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  46. Standard and Poor’s. (2011). Principles of credit ratings. Global credit portal, published February 16, 2011. http://www.standardandpoors.com/spf/upload/Ratings_EMEA/PrinciplesOfCreditRatings.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2014.
  47. Takalo, T., & Tanayama, T. (2010). Is there need for R&D subsidies? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 16–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winter, S. G. (1984). Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 5, 287–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yildizoglu, M. (2002). Competing R&D strategies in an evolutionary industry model. Computational Economics, 19, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations