A Neo-institutionalist Model of the Diffusion of IFRS Accounting Standards
- 505 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to prepare a diffusion model of the new international accounting standards known as the international financial reporting standards (IFRS). This model fits within the neo-institutional conceptual framework; more specifically, we used the DiMaggio/Powell analytical grid. Our desire to prepare this model was born from the observation that the analytical framework that is generally used to study the adoption of these new standards is the neo-institutional framework and that the principal methodologies implemented are qualitative. The question addressed in this study regards the forces leading an agent—in this case, an organisation providing standards for accounting—to adopt, at a given moment, these new standards. Existing studies, as interesting as they might be, are devoted to the question of adoption and leave aside the question of diffusion. In other words, the evolution of the system as a whole in time is ignored. Constructing a model appeared to us to be a way to move beyond these limitations. This model allows us to formalise the forces at work in the DiMaggio/Powell representation and to simulate the diffusion processes of the IFRS. To this end, we implement a multi-agent simulation. The various simulation scenarios are then compared to the observed diffusion of the IFRS.
KeywordsIFRS Diffusion Neo-institutionalism Multi-agent simulation
- Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7–8), 565–596. doi: 10.1016/s0361-3682(00)00038-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collin, S.-O. Y., Tagesson, T., Andersson, A., Cato, J., & Hansson, K. (2009). Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 141–174. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.003.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.Google Scholar
- Fournier, S., Ferrarini, A., & Tranvouez, E. (2010) A multiagent decision support system for scheduling repair - application to socio-technical organizations. In P. Loucopoulos & J.L Cavarero (Eds.), proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (pp. 365–374), RCIS 2010, Nice, France.Google Scholar
- Garcia, R. (2005) Uses of agent-based modeling in innovation/new product. Development Research Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5), 380–398.Google Scholar
- Hawley, A. (1968). Human ecology. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 328–337). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Lasmin, D. (2011). An institutional perspective on international financial reporting standards adoption in developing countries. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 15(2), 61–71.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599–620.Google Scholar