Skip to main content
Log in

The Strategic Exploitation of Limited Information and Opportunity in Networked Markets

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of constraining interactions within a market. A model is analysed in which boundedly rational agents trade with and gather information from their neighbours within a trade network. It is demonstrated that a trader’s ability to profit and to identify the equilibrium price is positively correlated with its degree of connectivity within the market. Where traders differ in their number of potential trading partners, well-connected traders are found to benefit from aggressive trading behaviour. Where information propagation is constrained by the topology of the trade network, connectedness affects the nature of the strategies employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axtell R. (2005) The complexity of exchange. Economic Journal 115(504): F193–F210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. M. (1998). Bilateral trading on a network: A simulation study. In: Working Notes: Artificial Societies and Computational Markets, Autonomous Agents ’98 Workshop, Minneapolis, St. Paul, pp. 31–36.

  • Brock W.A., Hommes C.H. (1997) A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65: 1059–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff D. (2003) Explorations in evolutionary design of online auction market mechanism. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research and Application 2(2): 162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, D., & Bruten, J. (1997). Minimal-intelligence agents for bargaining behaviors in market-based environments. Technical Report HPL-97-91, HP Labs.

  • Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Evstigneev I.V., Taksar M. (1994) Stochastic equilibria on graphs, I. Journal of Mathematical Economics 23(5): 401–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evstigneev I.V., Taksar M. (1995) Stochastic equilibria on graphs, II. Journal of Mathematical Economics 24(4): 383–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evstigneev I.V., Taksar M. (2002) Equilibrium states of random economies with locally interacting agents and solutions to stochastic variational inequalities in \({\langle {L}_{1}, {L}_{\infty} \rangle}\). Annals of Operations Research 114(1–4): 145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbo P., Grassi R. (2004) Equilibrium prices on a financial graph. Computational Economics 24(2): 117–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gode D.K., Sunder S. (1997) What makes markets allocationally efficient? . he Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 603–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt P., Clower R. (2000) The emergence of economic organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 41(1): 55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman A.P., Vriend N.J. (2001) Evolving market structure: An ACE model of price dispersion and loyalty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25(3–4): 459–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lensberg T., Schenk-Hoppé K.R. (2007) On the evolution of investment strategies and the Kelly rule – a Darwinian approach. Review of Finance 11: 25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaglia M.J., Skvoretz J., Willer D., Markovsky B. (1995) Negociated exchange in social networks. Social Forces 74(1): 123–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky B., Willer D., Patton T. (1988) Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 53(2): 220–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M.E.J. (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2): 167–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble J., Davy S., Franks D.W. (2004) Effects of the topology of social networks on information transmission. In: Schaal S., Ijspeert A.J., Billard A., Vijayakumar S., Hallam J., Meyer J.-A.(eds) Eighth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 395–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou C.H. (1994) On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 48(3): 498–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf H.E. (1973) Computation of economic equilibrium. Yale Universiy Press (with T. Hansen), New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V.L. (1962) An experimental study of competitive market behaviour. Journal of Political Economy 70: 111–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassier, T., Menczer, F. (in press). Social network structure, segregation, and equality in a labour market with referral hiring. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation.

  • Tesfatsion L. (2001) Structure, behavior, and market power in an evolutionary labor market with adaptive search. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25(3–4): 419–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vriend, N. J. (2006). ACE models of endogenous interactions. In: L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Vol. 2, Chap. 21 (pp. 1047–1079). Elsevier.

  • Watts D., Strogatz S. (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393: 440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widrow B., Hoff M.E. (1960) Adaptive switching circuits. IRE WESCON Convention Record 4: 96–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite A. (2001) Bilateral trade and ‘small-world’ networks. Computational Economics 18: 49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, A. (2006). Economic activity on fixed networks. In L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Vol. 2, Chap. 20 (pp. 1013–1045). Elsevier.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Ladley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ladley, D., Bullock, S. The Strategic Exploitation of Limited Information and Opportunity in Networked Markets. Comput Econ 32, 295–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-008-9140-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-008-9140-8

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation