Computational Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 189–194 | Cite as

Empirical Validation in Agent-based Models: Introduction to the Special Issue

  • G. Fagiolo
  • C. Birchenhall
  • P. Windrum


Stylize Fact Market Design Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Social Simulation Transmission Grid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axtell, R. (2000). Why agents? On the varied motivation for agent computing in the social sciences. Working Paper No. 17, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  2. Barreteau, O. (2003). Our companion modelling approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6. available at
  3. Chattoe E. (2002). Building empirically plausible multi-agent systems: A case study of innovation diffusion. In: Dautenhahn K. (eds) Socially intelligent agents: Creating relationships with computers and robots. Dordrecht, KluwerGoogle Scholar
  4. Colander D. (eds) (2007). Post-walrasian macroeconomics. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowan R., Foray D. (2002). Evolutionary economics and the counterfactual threat: On the nature and role of counterfactual history as an empirical tool in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 539–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawid, H., & Fagiolo, G. (Eds.). (2007). Special issue on “Agent-Based Models for Economic Policy Design”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming. Edmonds, B., & Moss, S. (2005). From KISS to KIDS – an ‘anti-simplistic’ modelling approach. In P. Davidsson, B. Logan, & K. Takadama (Eds.), Multi agent based simulation 2004, Vol. 3415, (pp. 130–144) Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Gallegati M., Delli Gatti D., Di Guilmi C., Gaffeo E., Giulioni G., Palestrini A. (2005). A new approach to business fluctuations: Heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 56: 489–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert N. (2004). Open problems in using agent-based models in industrial and labor dynamics. In: Leombruni R., Richiardi M. (eds) Industry and labor dynamics: The agent-based computational approach. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilli M., Winker P. (2003). A global optimization heuristic for estimating agent-based models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 42: 299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gourieroux C., Monfort A. (1996). Simulation-based econometric methods. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirman A. (1997). The economy as an interactive system. In: Arthur W.B., Durlauf S.N., Lane D. (eds) The economy as an evolving complex system II. Santa Fe, Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Leombruni, R., Richiardi, M., Saam, N. J., & Sonnessa, M. (2006). A common protocol for agent-based social simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 91. available at
  13. Midgley D.F., Marks R.E., Kunchamwar D. (2007). The building and assurance of agent-based models: An example and challenge to the field. Journal of Business Research 60: 884–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moss S. (2002). Policy analysis from first principles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 7267–7274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pyka A., Fagiolo G. (2007). Agent-based modelling: A methodology for neo-schumpeterian economics. In: Hanusch H., Pyka A. (eds) The Elgar companion to neo-schumpeterian economics. Cheltenham, Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosser, J. B. (Ed.). (2004). Complexity in economics. The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 174, Edward Elgar, Aldergate, 3 volumes.Google Scholar
  17. Sargent, R. P. (1998). Verification and validation of simulation models. Proceedings of 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. California: San Diego.Google Scholar
  18. Schelling T.C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1: 143–186Google Scholar
  19. Tesfatsion L. (2006). ACE: A constructive approach to economic theory. In: Tesfatsion L., Judd K. (eds) Handbook of computational economics II: Agent-based computational economics. Amsterdam, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  20. Tesfatsion L., Judd K. (eds) (2006). Handbook of computational economics II: Agent-based computational economics. Amsterdam, North HollandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Economics and ManagementSant’Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly
  2. 2.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Manchester Metropolition University, Business SchoolManchesterUK
  4. 4.MERITUniversity of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations