Critical Criminology

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 503–518 | Cite as

Green Activist Criminology and the Epistemologies of the South

  • David Rodríguez Goyes


Since its inception, green criminology has attempted to highlight instances of environmental degradation and destruction, as well as examine and analyse the causes thereof and contemplate the responses thereto. Efforts to reduce environmental crime and curb environmental harm, more generally, have not gone unimpeded, however. Activists around the world are being killed in record numbers trying to defend their land and protect the environment. In this article, I consider the role of socially engaged scholars who reject the idea or ideology of ‘neutral scientists’ in light of the risks faced by environmental defenders. As such, this article replies to the claims that activism and the production of knowledge must be clearly separated. To do so, this article draws upon examples from Latin America to underscore the importance of an ‘activist criminology’ (Belknap in Criminology 53(1):1–22. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12063, 2015) attuned to environmental harms and injustices perpetrated on those seeking to prevent the despoliation of the Earth.


Western Science Environmental Harm Public Sociology Environmental Crime Critical Criminology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author would like to thank Avi Brisman, Kerry Carrington, Rune Ellefsen, Ragnhild Sollund and Nigel South for their valuable comments on earlier drafts.


  1. Aas, K. F. (2012). ‘The Earth is one but the world is not’: Criminological theory and its geopolitical divisions. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 5–20.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ander-Egg, E. (2003). Repensando la investigación-acción-participativa. Buenos Aires: Lumen.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (2006). La sociedad del riesgo, hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  4. Belknap, J. (2015). Activist criminology: Criminologists’ responsability to advocate for social and legal justice. Criminology, 53(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blevins, K. (forthcoming). Positivism. In A. Brisman, E. Carrabine & N. South (Eds.), The Routledge companion to criminological theory and concepts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Boekhout van Solinge, T. (2014). Researching illegal logging and deforestation. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(2), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (2003). El oficio de científico (J. Jordá, Trans.). Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama.Google Scholar
  8. Brisman, A. (2012). The cultural silence of clima change contrariarism. In R. White (Ed.), Clima change from a criminological perspective (pp. 41–70). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brisman, A. (2013). The violence of silence: Some reflections on access to information, public participation in decision-making, and access to justice in matters concerning the environment. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59(3), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brisman, A., & South, N. (2014). Green cultural criminology, constructions of environmental harm, consumerism, and resistance to ecocide.Google Scholar
  11. Brisman, A., South, N., & White, R. (Eds.). (2015). Environmental crime and social conflict. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Carlen, P. (2011). Against evangelism in academic criminology: For criminology as a scientific art. In M. Bosworth & C. Hoyle (Eds.), What is criminology?. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
  13. Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56 (1), 1–20. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azv083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christie, N. (2016). Apartheid in modernity. Justice, Power and Resistance (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1975). The emergence of a scientific specialty: The self-exemplifying case of the sociology of science. In L. A. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure. Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 139–174). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  17. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  18. Del Olmo, R. (1998). The ecological impact of illicit drug cultivation and crop eradication programs in Latin America. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deleuze, G. (1990). ¿Qué es un dispositivo? In G. Canguilhem (Ed.), Michel foucault, filósofo (p. 344). Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  20. Editors. (2015). The crime of disagreement. The herd of independent academics panics over Heather Mac Donald., Opinion. The Wallstreet Journal. Retrieved from
  21. Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2012). Cultural criminology, an invitation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy, discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1991). La verdad y las formas jurídicas (E. Lynch, Trans. 2nd ed.). Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. (2001). Defender la sociedad. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  25. Gadd, D., et al. (2012). Editorial introduction. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt & S. F. Messner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 1–6). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garland, D. (2002). Of crimes and criminals, The development of criminology in Great Britain. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 17–68). Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Global-Witness. (2012). A hidden crisis? [Press release]. Retrieved from
  28. Global-Witness. (2014a). Deadly environment. London: Global Witness.Google Scholar
  29. Global-Witness. (2014b). Peru’s deadly environment [Press release]. Retrieved from
  30. Global-Witness. (2015). How many more? [Press release]. Retrieved from
  31. Goyes, D. R. (2015a). Denying the harms of animal abductions for biomedical research. In R. Sollund (Ed.), Green harms and crimes. Critical criminology in a changing world (pp. 170–188). London: Ashgate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goyes, D. R. (2015b). Land uses and conflict in Colombia. In A. Brisman, N. South, & R. White (Eds.), Environmental crime and social conflict (pp. 75–93). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. Goyes, D. R., & South, N. (2016). Land-grabs, bio-piracy and the inversion of justice in Colombia. British Journal of Criminology, 56(3), 558–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (Tercera ed., pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Hall, M. (2011). Environmental victims: Challenges for criminology and victimology in the 21st century. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 4, 371–391.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, M. (2012). Environmental harm: The missing victims? Criminal Justice Matters, 90(1), 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall, M. (2014). Environmental harm and environmental victims > scoping out a ‘green victimology’. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, M. (2016). Doing ‘green criminology’: methodologies, research strategies and values (or lack thereof?). In M. Hall (Ed.), Greening criminology in the 21st century. Surrey and Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. Hance, J. (2015, 24 June). Amazon tribe creates 500-page traditional medicine encyclopedia. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from
  40. Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Hilborn, R. C. (2004). Sea gulls, butterflies, and grasshoppers: A brief history of the butterfly effect in nonlinear dynamics. American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 425–427.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hillyard, P., & Tombs, S. (2013). ¿Más allá de la criminología? Revista Crítica Penal y Poder, 4, 224–246.Google Scholar
  43. Hoyos Vásquez, G. (2006). Ciencia y ética desde una teoría discursiva. Paper presented at the VI jornadas latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología, Bogotá, Colombia.
  44. Isopp, B. (2015). Scientists who become activists: Are they crossing a line? JCOM, 14(02), C03.Google Scholar
  45. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgement under uncertainity: Heuristics and biases (Vol. IV). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? no, simply amodern! steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in History and Philosphy of Science, 21(1), 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2011). Public criminology?. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A., Barret, K. L., & Stretesky, P. B. (2013). Is it a crime to produce ecological disorganization? British Journal of Criminology, 53, 997–1016. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azt051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lynch, M. J., & Stretesky, P. B. (2014). Exploring green criminology. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  50. Maintenay, A. (2013). Environmentalism as religion: A fruitful concept? a roundtable discussion. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 42, 291–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mol, H. (2016). “De respetar las etnias para que sean productivas”: Agroindustria, Daño Social y Ambiental, y Multiculturalismo Neoliberal. Revista Crítica Penal y Poder, 10, 53–82.Google Scholar
  52. Pavarini, M. (2008). Control y dominación, teorías criminológicas burguesas y proyecto hegemónico (I. Muñagorri, Trans. 9th ed.). México D.F.: Siglo Veintiuno editores.Google Scholar
  53. Potter, G. R. (2010). What is green criminology. Sociology Review, 20(2). Retrieved from
  54. Potter, G. R. (2013). Justifying “green” criminology: Values and “taking sides” in an ecologically informed social science. In M. Cowburn, M. Duggan, A. Robinson, & P. Senior (Eds.), The value(s) of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 125–141). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  55. RCN, L. R. (2015). Asesinado funcionario público de San José del Guaviare. RCN Radio. Retrieved from
  56. Ross, A. (1974). On law and justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ruggiero, V. (2011). Book review: Green criminology as political activism? Crime, Law and Social Change, 56(1), 91–94.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ruggiero, V. (2013). Critical criminology, power and systemic conflicts. European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control Newsletter, pp. 22-24. Retrieved from
  59. Santos, B. D. S. (2002). A crítica da Raçao Indolente: Contra o Desperdício da Experiência. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.Google Scholar
  60. Santos, B. D. S. (2009a). Introduçao. In B. D. S. Santos & M. P. Meneses (Eds.), Epistemologias do Sul (pp. 9–19). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
  61. Santos, B. D. S. (2009b). Para além do pensamento abissal: Das Linhas Globais a uma Ecologia de Saberes. In B. D. S. Santos & M. P. Meneses (Eds.), Epistemologias do Sul (pp. 23–71). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
  62. Santos, B. D. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy, the plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  64. Sollund, R. (2013). Animal abuse, animal rights and species justice. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology 69th Annual Meeting, Atlanta. Animal abuse, animal rights and species justice.Google Scholar
  65. Sollund, R. (2015). Introduction: Critical green criminology—An agenda for change. In R. Sollund (Ed.), Green harms and crimes. Critical criminology in a changing world (pp. 1–26). London: Ashgate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. South, N. (2014). Green criminology: Reflections, connections, horizons. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(2), 5–20. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v3i2.172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. South, N., & Brisman, A. (Eds.). (2013). Routledge international handbook of green criminology. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Tombs, S., & Hillyard, P. (2004). Towards a political economy of harm: States, corporations and the production of inequality. In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond criminology: Taking harm seriously (pp. 30–54). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  69. Vargas Roncancio, I. D. (2011). Sistemas de Conocimiento Ecológico Tradicional y sus Mecannismos de Transformación: El Caso de una Chagra Amazónica. (Maestría en Biodiciencias y Derecho), Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. Retrieved from
  70. Wacquant, L. (2007). Pierre bourdieu. In R. Stones (Ed.), Key contemporary thinkers (pp. 261–277 and 411–414). London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Wallner, F. (1994). Constructive realism, aspects of a new epistemological movement. Viena: Wilhelm Braumüller.Google Scholar
  72. Walters, R. (2004). Criminology and genetically modified food. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walters, R. (2006). Crime, bio-agriculture and the exploitation of hunger. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walters, R. (2011). Eco crime and genetically modified food. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. White, R. (2012). The foundations of eco-global criminology. In R. Ellefsen, R. Sollund, & G. Larsen (Eds.), Eco-global crimes, contemporary problems and future challenges (pp. 15–31). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  76. White, R. (2013a). Environmental activism and resistance to state-corporate crime. In E. Stanley & J. McCulloch (Eds.), State crime and resistance (pp. 129–140). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. White, R. (2013b). Environmental harm: An eco-justice perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wyatt, T. (2013). Wildlife trafficking, a deconstruction of the crime, the victims and the offenders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  79. Wyatt, T. (2015). Invisible pillaging: The hidden harm of corporate biopiracy. In P. Davies, P. Francies, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Invisible crimes and social harms (pp. 161–177). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law, Faculty of LawUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Antonio Nariño UniversityBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations